Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "d21724".
Did you mean:
d21723
2016 Jun 25
2
Memory scope proposal
...ase it seems that the atomicity, memory ordering and memory scope are all equally primary information that characterize the semantics of memory instructions.
We have posted reviews that implement the proposal and invite everyone to discuss it:
http://reviews.llvm.org/D21723
http://reviews.llvm.org/D21724
Thank you,
Konstantin
-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Stellard [mailto:tom at stellard.net]
Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2016 4:51 PM
To: Pekka Jääskeläinen <pekka.jaaskelainen at tut.fi>
Cc: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com>; Liu, Yaxun (Sam) <Yaxun.Liu at amd.com>; K...
2016 May 18
2
Memory scope proposal
Hi all,
On 02.05.2016 17:46, Tom Stellard via llvm-dev wrote:
>> Why not going with a metadata attachment directly and kill the "singlethread" keyword? Something like:
>> >Something like:
>> >
>> > cmpxchg i32* %addr, i32 42, i32 0 monotonic monotonic, 3, !memory.scope{!42}
>> > cmpxchg i32* %addr, i32 42, i32 0 monotonic monotonic, 3,
2016 Jul 03
2
Memory scope proposal
...ory ordering and memory scope are all equally primary information that characterize the semantics of memory instructions.
>>
>> We have posted reviews that implement the proposal and invite everyone to discuss it:
>> http://reviews.llvm.org/D21723
>> http://reviews.llvm.org/D21724
>
> It seems you’re going back to integer, which I don’t really like for reasons mentioned earlier in this thread, and that I don’t feel you addressed here.
>
> —
> Mehdi
>
>
>
>
>>
>> Thank you,
>> Konstantin
>>
>>
>>
>&g...