search for: d20337

Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "d20337".

Did you mean: 20337
2016 May 19
4
Phabricator not getting all comments sent by email?
...have never made it onto the website. Not having not seen that response (because I was looking on the website), I ended up writing effectively the same thing a second time. Oops. From: Rafael EspĂ­ndola <llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org> Date: Thu, May 19, 2016 at 7:13 AM Subject: Re: [PATCH] D20337: [MC] Support symbolic expressions in assembly directives To: reviews+D20337+public+c956a2297e76c848 at reviews.llvm.org Cc: llvm-commits <llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-d...
2016 May 25
3
Phabricator not getting all comments sent by email?
Just ran into another thread where phabricator is seemingly ignoring replies. This one seems to be a different issue. In the thread "[PATCH] D20337: [MC] Support symbolic expressions in assembly directives", Phabricator seems to have completely ignored all of the replies starting with my (emailed) reply earlier today: "The .s does have a way to carry the location.". Except for the latest "test" email, where I moved th...
2016 May 25
0
Phabricator not getting all comments sent by email?
...uire that all comments are done through phabricator itself? -Krzysztof On 5/25/2016 10:20 AM, James Y Knight via llvm-dev wrote: > Just ran into another thread where phabricator is seemingly ignoring > replies. This one seems to be a different issue. > > In the thread "[PATCH] D20337: [MC] Support symbolic expressions in > assembly directives", Phabricator seems to have completely ignored all > of the replies starting with my (emailed) reply earlier today: "The .s > does have a way to carry the location.". > > Except for the latest "test"...
2016 Apr 19
3
Backward references in assembly absolute expressions
While trying to compile an existing codebase which uses handwritten assembly with LLVM, I ran into an issue around using backward references in assembly absolute expressions. A simple example can be the following snippet: _foo: .fill 0x100 _bar: .fill _bar - _foo _baz: .fill 0x100 While gas compiles this snippet without any errors, the integrated assembler throws an error: expected
2016 May 20
0
Phabricator not getting all comments sent by email?
On 19 May 2016 at 19:59, James Y Knight via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Does anyone know why phab sometimes misses replies sent by email? Usually > they make it through, but sometimes not. Doesn't seem to be a trivial thing to do: https://secure.phabricator.com/T7358 https://secure.phabricator.com/T5181 cheers, --renato