search for: d19975

...is can make tools like Memory Sanitizer less > useful, > > because now the value is initialized even in some path where that value > is > > never intended to be used > > * I guess this case could be related to http://reviews.llvm.org/D19971 > and http://reviews.llvm.org/D19975 for instance. > I wasn't happy with the fixes in the first place but I > ended-up trusting the tool because it proposed a codepath where the > variables were used without being initialized. I don't know about > msan (yet :) but if the warnings are false positives is ther...

Hi Apelete, Thanks for trying to help cleanup the LLVM codebase of Clang Static Analyzer warnings. But it seems a lot of the fixes that are being proposed are somewhat mechanical and may be doing the wrong thing in a few ways. * Initializing variables that are only used when initialized through some existing codepath - this can make tools like Memory Sanitizer less useful, because now the value