Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "d1927".
Did you mean:
1927
2013 Nov 03
3
[LLVMdev] Improving OCaml bindings
...dlerc.com/D1926
I'd like to add garbage collection support to the API
wherever safe, that's at least DataLayout.t and llmemorybuffer.
This removes the need for .dispose. I could remove it and break
the API or print a warning at runtime.
3) http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1927
In order to allow code generation from OCaml, I need to build
a stub library per configured target. I'm not sure how to
integrate it with LLVM's build system; my current solution seems
very ad-hoc.
I will update the patch to use Dynlink interface (this is the
textb...
2013 Nov 03
0
[LLVMdev] Improving OCaml bindings
...upport to the API
>>> wherever safe, that's at least DataLayout.t and llmemorybuffer.
>>> This removes the need for .dispose. I could remove it and break
>>> the API or print a warning at runtime.
>>>
>>> 3) http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1927 [3]
>>>
>>>
>>> In order to allow code generation from OCaml, I need to build
>>> a stub library per configured target. I'm not sure how to
>>> integrate it with LLVM's build system; my current solution seems
>>> very ad-hoc....