search for: d1925

Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "d1925".

Did you mean: 1925
2013 Nov 03
3
[LLVMdev] Improving OCaml bindings
...y interested in improving LLVM's OCaml bindings. I have several nontrivial patches sitting on llvm-commits for several weeks, and so far there's been little interest in them. Could someone with a good understanding of OCaml please take a look at these? 1) http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1925 Every other function in OCaml bindings accepts context explicitly, would it be a legitimate change to make existing functions accept it as well? This would break the API. 2) http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1926 I'd like to add garbage collection support to the API wher...
2013 Nov 03
0
[LLVMdev] Improving OCaml bindings
...al patches sitting on llvm-commits for several >>> weeks, and so far there's been little interest in them. >>> >>> Could someone with a good understanding of OCaml please take >>> a look at these? >>> >>> 1) http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1925 [1] >>> >>> >>> Every other function in OCaml bindings accepts context >>> explicitly, would it be a legitimate change to make existing >>> functions accept it as well? This would break the API. >>> >> >> I don't really...