Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "d1925".
Did you mean:
1925
2013 Nov 03
3
[LLVMdev] Improving OCaml bindings
...y interested in improving LLVM's OCaml bindings. I have
several nontrivial patches sitting on llvm-commits for several
weeks, and so far there's been little interest in them.
Could someone with a good understanding of OCaml please take
a look at these?
1) http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1925
Every other function in OCaml bindings accepts context
explicitly, would it be a legitimate change to make existing
functions accept it as well? This would break the API.
2) http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1926
I'd like to add garbage collection support to the API
wher...
2013 Nov 03
0
[LLVMdev] Improving OCaml bindings
...al patches sitting on llvm-commits for several
>>> weeks, and so far there's been little interest in them.
>>>
>>> Could someone with a good understanding of OCaml please take
>>> a look at these?
>>>
>>> 1) http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1925 [1]
>>>
>>>
>>> Every other function in OCaml bindings accepts context
>>> explicitly, would it be a legitimate change to make existing
>>> functions accept it as well? This would break the API.
>>>
>>
>> I don't really...