Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "d18576".
Did you mean:
18576
2018 Oct 01
2
OptBisect implementation for new pass manager
.../2018 01:17 AM, Kaylor, Andrew wrote:
> Some of the issues we're talking about were also considered when I did the initial implementation of OptBisect. If anyone wants to look at the relevant reviews they can be found here:
Thanks for sharing these, very useful!
> https://reviews.llvm.org/D18576 (Abandoned first attempt)
> https://reviews.llvm.org/D19172 (Committed second version)
>
> Then there were a dozen or so revisions to implement the opt-in process.
>
> The highlights were:
>
> - My initial implementation had a hard-coded list of passes that couldn't be skip...
2018 Oct 01
4
OptBisect implementation for new pass manager
On 10/01/2018 11:13 PM, David Greene wrote:
> Philip Pfaffe <philip.pfaffe at gmail.com> writes:
>> Sorry, but I strongly oppose to the road you're suggesting here. As I
>> said before the Pass*Manager* is entirely the wrong place to handle
>> OptNone, the absolutely the wrong design. It makes sense for function
>> *only*, and immediately breaks down everywhere
2018 May 01
4
Need guidance to work on NEW PASS managers bugs
On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 10:52 PM, Kaylor, Andrew <andrew.kaylor at intel.com>
wrote:
> Hi Vivek,
>
>
>
> Have you read the mailing list threads on this topic? I don’t believe
> we’re quite ready to make the switch yet. There was a discussion last
> October about what was left to be done. I’m sure it has been discussed
> since then too. Here’s a link to the start of