search for: d18

...consideration. for(d1 in 0:n){ for(d2 in 0:n){ for(d3 in 0:n){ for(d4 in 0:n){ for(d5 in 0:n){ for(d6 in 0:n){ for(d7 in 0:n){ for(d8 in 0:n){ for(d9 in 0:n){ for(d10 in 0:n){ for(d11 in 0:n){ for(d12 in 0:n){ for(d13 in 0:n){ for(d14 in 0:n){ for(d15 in 0:n){ for(d16 in 0:n){ for(d17 in 0:n){ for(d18 in 0:n){ for(d19 in 0:n){ for(d20 in 0:n){ list=c(d1,d2,d3,d4,d5,d6,d7,d8,d9,d10,d11,d12,d13,d14,d15,d16,d17,d18,d19,d20) }}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}} [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

...@ @bar @ BB#0: @ %L.entry push {r11, lr} add r0, r1, #2 vldr s0, [r1] vldr s2, [r0] # <= here load is misaligned vmovl.u8 q8, d0 vmovl.u8 q9, d1 vmovl.u16 q8, d16 vmovl.u16 q9, d18 vmov r0, r1, d16 vmov r2, r3, d18 bl zzz(PLT) pop {r11, pc} with LLVM trunk, assembly looks like: bar: @ @bar @ BB#0: @ %L.entry push {r11, lr} add r0, r1, #2 vld1.32 {d16[0]}, [r1, :16] v...

...+ " vld1.16 {d16}, [%[b]]!\n" + " vld1.16 {d20}, [%[a]]!\n" + " subs %[remainder], %[remainder], #4\n" + " vmull.s16 q0, d16, d20\n" + " beq 5f\n" + " b 4f\n" + "1:" + " vld1.16 {d16, d17, d18, d19}, [%[b]]!\n" + " vld1.16 {d20, d21, d22, d23}, [%[a]]!\n" + " subs %[len], %[len], #16\n" + " vmull.s16 q0, d16, d20\n" + " vmlal.s16 q0, d17, d21\n" + " vmlal.s16 q0, d18, d22\n" + " vmlal.s16 q0, d19, d23\n&q...

...@ %L.entry > push {r11, lr} > add r0, r1, #2 > vldr s0, [r1] > vldr s2, [r0] # <= here load is misaligned > vmovl.u8 q8, d0 > vmovl.u8 q9, d1 > vmovl.u16 q8, d16 > vmovl.u16 q9, d18 > vmov r0, r1, d16 > vmov r2, r3, d18 > bl zzz(PLT) > pop {r11, pc} > > with LLVM trunk, assembly looks like: > > bar: @ @bar > @ BB#0: @ %L.entry > push {r11, lr} &gt...

In hvm enviroment, acpi failed. why? centos5.1 =================================================== [root@hvm001 ~]# xm dmesg __ __ _____ _ ____ ___ ____ _ ____ \ \/ /___ _ __ |___ / / | |___ \ / _ \___ \ ___| | ___| \ // _ \ \047_ \ |_ \ | | __) |_| (_) |__) | / _ \ |___ \ / \ __/ | | | ___) || |_ / __/|__\__, / __/ | __/ |___) | /_/\_\___|_| |_| |____(_)_(_)_____| /_/_____(_)___|_|____/

...eady: 0, ptr: 0, port: 0, data: 0, count: 0, size: 0 > I/O request not ready: 0, ptr: 0, port: 0, data: 0, count: 0, size: 0 > xc_map_foreign_batch: mmap failed: Cannot allocate memory > xc_map_foreign_batch error 12 ''xm dmesg'' gives me a lot of these: > (XEN) mm.c:645:d18 Non-privileged (18) attempt to map I/O space 00000000 > (XEN) mm.c:645:d18 Non-privileged (18) attempt to map I/O space 000000c0 > (XEN) mm.c:645:d18 Non-privileged (18) attempt to map I/O space 0000009f > (XEN) mm.c:645:d18 Non-privileged (18) attempt to map I/O space 000000e0 > (XEN)...

...result.data[i] = a.data[i] * b.data[i]; return result; } void TestVec4Multiply(vec4& a, vec4& b, vec4& result) { result = a * b; } With -O3 the loop gets vectorized and the code generated looks optimal: __Z16TestVec4MultiplyR4vec4S0_S0_: @ BB#0: vld1.32 {d16, d17}, [r1] vld1.32 {d18, d19}, [r0] vmul.f32 q8, q9, q8 vst1.32 {d16, d17}, [r2] bx lr However if I replace the operator* with a NEON intrinsic implementation (I know the vectorizer figured out optimal code in this case anyway, but that wasn't true for my real situation) then the temporary "result" seems...

...t> %tmp3, <4 x float>* %C ret void } declare <4 x float> @llvm.arm.neon.vmaxs.v4f32(<4 x float>, <4 x float>) nounwind readnone I've got following code generated: ... vmaxf32: @ @vmaxf32 @ BB#0: vld1.64 {d16, d17}, [r2] vld1.64 {d18, d19}, [r1] vmax.f32 q8, q9, q8 vst1.64 {d16, d17}, [r0] bx lr ... Now if use <16 x float> vectors instead of <4 x float>: define void @vmaxf32(<16 x float> *%C, <16 x float>* %A, <16 x float>* %B) nounwind { %tmp1 = load <16 x float>* %A %tmp2 = loa...

On Oct 14, 2013, at 3:27 AM, Zakk <zakk0610 at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > I meet this problem when compiling the TREAM benchmark (http://www.cs.virginia.edu/stream/FTP/Code/) with enable-misched > > The small function will be scheduled as good code, but if opt inline this function, the inline part will be scheduled as bad code. A bug for this is welcome. Pretty soon, I’ll

Hi Sebastien, > Thanks for the quick answer, how do I know which type is legal/illegal with respect to calling convention ? the code generators are supposed to produce working code no matter what the parameter type is. The fact that the ARM ABI doesn't specify how <2 x i8> is passed just means that the code generators can pass it using whatever technique it feels like (since it

Hi all, I meet this problem when compiling the TREAM benchmark ( http://www.cs.virginia.edu/stream/FTP/Code/) with enable-misched The small function will be scheduled as good code, but if opt inline this function, the inline part will be scheduled as bad code. so I rewrite a simple code as attached link (foo.c), and compiled with two different methods: *method A:* *$clang -O3 foo.c -static -S

From: Jyri Sarha <jsarha at ti.com> I optimized Speex resampler for NEON capable ARM CPUs. The first patch should speed up resampling on any platform that can spare the increased memory usage. It would be nice to have these merged to the master branch. Please let me know if there is anything I can do to help the the merge. The patches have been rebased on top of master branch in

...If you are interested or know anyone that might be, check the full application at: https://my.hirehive.io/genomics-medicine-ireland/jobs/39038/bioinformatician <https://bit.ly/2BfDvRA> Dublin is currently a great place to work and live! :-) Cherrywood Business Park, Building 4 | Dublin D18 K7W4 | Ireland This e-mail message may contain confidential or legally privileged information and is intended only for the use of the intended recipient(s). Any unauthorised disclosure, dissemination, distribution, copying or the taking of any action in reliance on the information herein is prohib...

...Xen 3.1 (32 Bits PAE -- tarball download) on a debian Etch system. When starting a DomU, I get on the console: Checking if this processor honours the WP bit even in supervisor mode... <1>BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address c0f5672c and in xm dmesg: (XEN) mm.c:612:d18 Non-privileged (18) attempt to map I/O space 003fc2f2 (XEN) mm.c:3267:d18 ptwr_emulate: could not get_page_from_l1e() (Se details in attachement) It does not happen all times, if the DomU boots, then it will run fine for ages. If it crashes, it is always at boot time at that place. So workaround...

...2, suffix2) d9 = mytwo(prefix, roots2, suffix3) d10 = mytwo(prefix2, roots2, suffix) d11 = mytwo(prefix2, roots2, suffix2) d12 = mytwo(prefix2, roots2, suffix3) d13 = myone(prefix, roots) d14 = myone(prefix2, roots) d15 = myone(prefix, roots2) d16 = myone(prefix2, roots2) d17 = myone(roots, suffix) d18 = myone(roots, suffix2) d19 = myone(roots, suffix3) d20 = myone(roots2, suffix) d21 = myone(roots2, suffix2) d22 = myone(roots2, suffix3) d23 = myone(state, roots) d24 = myone(city, roots) d25 = myone(cityst, roots) d26 = myone(inscompany, roots) d27 = myone(state, roots2) d28 = myone(city, roots2)...

...test.c:11: note: created 2 versioning for alias checks. test.c:11: note: === vect_do_peeling_for_loop_bound ===Setting upper bound of nb iterations for epilogue loop to 14 test.c:11: note: LOOP VECTORIZED. The result is a very concise and very dense code: vld1.8 {d28[], d29[]}, [r5] vld3.8 {d16, d18, d20}, [r9]! vld3.8 {d17, d19, d21}, [r9] vmvn q3, q8 vmvn q15, q9 vmvn q8, q10 vsub.i8 q11, q3, q14 vsub.i8 q12, q15, q14 vsub.i8 q13, q8, q14 vst3.8 {d22, d24, d26}, [r8]! vst3.8 {d23, d25, d27}, [r8] cheers, --renato -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed......

...eclare <4 x float> @llvm.arm.neon.vmaxs.v4f32(<4 x float>, <4 x float>) nounwind readnone > > I've got following code generated: > > ... > vmaxf32: @ @vmaxf32 > @ BB#0: > vld1.64 {d16, d17}, [r2] > vld1.64 {d18, d19}, [r1] > vmax.f32 q8, q9, q8 > vst1.64 {d16, d17}, [r0] > bx lr > ... > > Now if use <16 x float> vectors instead of <4 x float>: > > define void @vmaxf32(<16 x float> *%C, <16 x float>* %A, <16 x float>*...

On 21 September 2012 09:28, Sebastien DELDON-GNB <sebastien.deldon at st.com> wrote: > declare <16 x float> @llvm.arm.neon.vmaxs.v16f32(<16 x float>, <16 x float>) nounwind readnone > > llc fails with following message: > > SplitVectorResult #0: 0x2258350: v16f32 = llvm.arm.neon.vmaxs 0x2258250, 0x2258050, 0x2258150 [ORD=3] [ID=0] > > LLVM ERROR: Do not

...eclare <4 x float> @llvm.arm.neon.vmaxs.v4f32(<4 x float>, <4 x float>) nounwind readnone > > I've got following code generated: > > ... > vmaxf32: @ @vmaxf32 > @ BB#0: > vld1.64 {d16, d17}, [r2] > vld1.64 {d18, d19}, [r1] > vmax.f32 q8, q9, q8 > vst1.64 {d16, d17}, [r0] > bx lr > ... > > Now if use <16 x float> vectors instead of <4 x float>: > > define void @vmaxf32(<16 x float> *%C, <16 x float>* %A, <16 x float>*...

Hi Rotem, Thanks for the quick answer, how do I know which type is legal/illegal with respect to calling convention ? Best Regards Seb > -----Original Message----- > From: Rotem, Nadav [mailto:nadav.rotem at intel.com] > Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2012 11:21 AM > To: Sebastien DELDON-GNB; llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu > Subject: RE: Vector argument passing abi for ARM ? > > The