Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "d17497".
Did you mean:
17497
2016 Feb 24
5
Fwd: [PATCH] D17497: Support arbitrary address space for intrinsics
...to
the particular implementation proposed here.)
3) I have no strong preference other than that the @llvm.masked_load
(and friends) intrinsics support alternate address spaces in some form
in the near future.
What do others think?
Philip
-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: [PATCH] D17497: Support arbitrary address space for intrinsics
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 08:39:38 +0000
From: Elena Demikhovsky <elena.demikhovsky at intel.com>
Reply-To: reviews+D17497+public+90f3d1b9468ba8ca at reviews.llvm.org
To: elena.demikhovsky at intel.com, apilipenko at azulsystems.com,
listmail...
2016 Mar 04
2
Fwd: [PATCH] D17497: Support arbitrary address space for intrinsics
...r than that the @llvm.masked_load
>> (and friends) intrinsics support alternate address spaces in some
>> form in the near future.
>>
>> What do others think?
>>
>> Philip
>>
>>
>> -------- Forwarded Message --------
>> Subject: [PATCH] D17497: Support arbitrary address space for intrinsics
>> Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 08:39:38 +0000
>> From: Elena Demikhovsky <elena.demikhovsky at intel.com>
>> Reply-To: reviews+D17497+public+90f3d1b9468ba8ca at reviews.llvm.org
>> To: elena.demikhovsky at intel.com, apili...
2016 Feb 24
0
Fwd: [PATCH] D17497: Support arbitrary address space for intrinsics
...d here.)
> 3) I have no strong preference other than that the @llvm.masked_load (and friends) intrinsics support alternate address spaces in some form in the near future.
>
> What do others think?
>
> Philip
>
>
> -------- Forwarded Message --------
> Subject: [PATCH] D17497: Support arbitrary address space for intrinsics
> Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 08:39:38 +0000
> From: Elena Demikhovsky <elena.demikhovsky at intel.com>
> Reply-To: reviews+D17497+public+90f3d1b9468ba8ca at reviews.llvm.org
> To: elena.demikhovsky at intel.com, apilipenko at azulsystems...
2016 Feb 24
2
[PATCH] D17497: Support arbitrary address space for intrinsics
> On Feb 24, 2016, at 09:32, David Chisnall via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
> My gut feeling is that it’s not worth it. When we move from typed to untyped pointers, we’re going to change the mangling from something like p200i8 to just p200, which is already quite a bit cleaner, and actually looks cleaner to me than the version proposed in this patch.
>
>