search for: d17394

...ion of the source code. One solution will be keeping a list of all the options that can affect code generation but not encoded in the bitcode. I have internally prototyped with disallowing these options explicitly and allowed only the reminder of the options to be embedded (http://reviews.llvm.org/D17394 <http://reviews.llvm.org/D17394>). A better solution might be encoding that information in "Options.td" as specific group. 2. Assembly input handling: This is a workaround to allow source code written in assembly to work with "-fembed-bitcode" options. When compiling asse...

...ion of the source code. One solution will be keeping a list of all the options that can affect code generation but not encoded in the bitcode. I have internally prototyped with disallowing these options explicitly and allowed only the reminder of the options to be embedded (http://reviews.llvm.org/D17394 <http://reviews.llvm.org/D17394>). A better solution might be encoding that information in "Options.td" as specific group. > > This is really interesting. I'm not a particularly security minded person so I don't have a lot of commentary there. An explicit whitelist so...