Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "d1622".
Did you mean:
1622
2016 Jan 08
2
Is it a va_arg bug in clang?
For the variadic function error with AMD64 abi and windows calling convention on 64bits x86, I find it has been tracked in Bug 20847 (https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=20847) (http://reviews.llvm.org/D1622#inline-9345). Do we still plan to fix it?
You know, I meet exactly same va_arg mistake with llvm3.7 when I enable the Uefi firmware (http://www.uefi.org/) build with clang. The ms_abi is the Uefi firmware binary module standard interface. I really hope this bug fix can been checked in as soon as p...
2016 Jan 09
2
[cfe-dev] Is it a va_arg bug in clang?
...en via cfe-dev <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org<mailto:cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote:
For the variadic function error with AMD64 abi and windows calling convention on 64bits x86, I find it has been tracked in Bug 20847 (https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=20847) (http://reviews.llvm.org/D1622#inline-9345). Do we still plan to fix it?
You know, I meet exactly same va_arg mistake with llvm3.7 when I enable the Uefi firmware (http://www.uefi.org/) build with clang. The ms_abi is the Uefi firmware binary module standard interface. I really hope this bug fix can been checked in as soon as p...
2016 Jan 10
2
[cfe-dev] Is it a va_arg bug in clang?
...en via cfe-dev <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org<mailto:cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote:
For the variadic function error with AMD64 abi and windows calling convention on 64bits x86, I find it has been tracked in Bug 20847 (https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=20847) (http://reviews.llvm.org/D1622#inline-9345). Do we still plan to fix it?
You know, I meet exactly same va_arg mistake with llvm3.7 when I enable the Uefi firmware (http://www.uefi.org/) build with clang. The ms_abi is the Uefi firmware binary module standard interface. I really hope this bug fix can been checked in as soon as p...