search for: d14290

...stuff so that it can do an out of tree bootstrap. I have created a script that fits into the make bootstrapping method that already exists. Not sure if this is up for removal because it is not dependent on autotools? Chris could you kindly add yourself as a reviewer to this http://reviews.llvm.org/D14290 On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 6:15 PM, C Bergström <cbergstrom at pathscale.com> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 12:12 AM, Steve King via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 6:33 AM, Martell Malone <martellmalone at gmail.com> > wro...

...s refactor the CMake to produce to logically > separated projects so that the builtins can be built with or without the > runtime libraries. It will all still be CMake-based. > > -Chris > > > Chris could you kindly add yourself as a reviewer to this > http://reviews.llvm.org/D14290 > > > On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 6:15 PM, C Bergström <cbergstrom at pathscale.com> > wrote: > >> On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 12:12 AM, Steve King via llvm-dev >> <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> > On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 6:33 AM, Martell Malone <marte...

On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 6:33 AM, Martell Malone <martellmalone at gmail.com> wrote: > Just as a point for building the builtins shouldn't we just need llvm-ar ? Thanks for pointing this out and I hope llvm-ar is up to the task. Even if targets must still port binutils, each step toward LLVM self-reliance is a step in the right direction. Without getting too far ahead of ourselves,