Displaying 20 results from an estimated 66 matches for "d13".
Did you mean:
13
2010 Jan 10
1
scatterplot matrix with ggplot2
...",
"Bonham Upper", "Bonham Upper", "Bonham Upper", "Bonham Upper",
"Bonham Upper", "Bonham Upper", "Bonham Upper", "Bonham Upper",
"Bonham Upper", "Bonham Upper", "Bonham Upper", "D13", "D13",
"D13", "D13", "D13", "D13", "D13", "D13", "D13", "D13", "D13",
"D13", "D13", "Sally Lower", "Sally Lower", "Sally Lower", "Sally L...
2008 Sep 22
1
Help for SUR model
I am an R beginner and trying to run a SUR model in R framework.
subset(esasp500, Obs <=449 & Obs>=197, select = -Date) ->ev13sub
c(Obs>=397) & c(Obs<=399) ->d13
c(Obs>=400) & c(Obs<=449) ->f13
SP500*f13 ->SP500f13
BBC~SP500+d13+SP500f13 ->sur132
BOW~SP500+d13+SP500f13 ->sur133
CSK~SP500+d13+SP500f13 ->sur134
DTC~SP500+d13+SP500f13 ->sur135
GP~SP500+d13+SP500f13 ->sur136
HAN~SP500+d13+SP500f13 ->sur137
IP...
2011 Feb 04
3
lapply, strsplit, and list elements
Hi there,
I have a problem about lapply, strsplit, and accessing list elements,
which I don't understand or cannot solve:
I have e.g. a character vector with three elements:
x = c("349/077,349/074,349/100,349/117",
"340/384.2,340/513,367/139,455/128,D13/168",
"600/437,128/903,128/904")
The task I want to perform, is to generate a list, comprising the
portion in front of the "/" of each element of x:
neededResult = list(c("349","349", "349", "349"),...
2010 Jul 05
2
nested for loops
...unction because it results with memory allocation problems.
Thanks for your time and consideration.
for(d1 in 0:n){
for(d2 in 0:n){
for(d3 in 0:n){
for(d4 in 0:n){
for(d5 in 0:n){
for(d6 in 0:n){
for(d7 in 0:n){
for(d8 in 0:n){
for(d9 in 0:n){
for(d10 in 0:n){
for(d11 in 0:n){
for(d12 in 0:n){
for(d13 in 0:n){
for(d14 in 0:n){
for(d15 in 0:n){
for(d16 in 0:n){
for(d17 in 0:n){
for(d18 in 0:n){
for(d19 in 0:n){
for(d20 in 0:n){
list=c(d1,d2,d3,d4,d5,d6,d7,d8,d9,d10,d11,d12,d13,d14,d15,d16,d17,d18,d19,d20)
}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
2010 May 30
0
How to interpret a result based on wmtsa
...d2 d3 d4 d5 d6
272462.52504 189076.44195 95736.37691 47830.40918 23593.41513
12409.42279
d7 d8 d9 d10 d11 d12
5977.28418 2887.81182 1408.06198 629.46550 368.87030 197.00823
d13 d14 d15
106.22607 29.75633 14.29115
$EDOF2
[1] NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
$EDOF3
d1 d2 d3 d4 d5 d6
2.079385e+05 1.039658e+05 5.197938e+04 2.598619e+04 1.298959e+04
6.491297e+03
d7...
2020 Mar 31
2
[ARM] Register pressure with -mthumb forces register reload before each call
...ADJCALLSTACKDOWN 0, 0, 14, $noreg, implicit-def dead $sp, implicit $sp
80B %3:tgpr = tLDRpci %const.0, 14, $noreg :: (load 4 from constant-pool)
96B $r0 = COPY %0:tgpr
112B $r1 = COPY %1:tgpr
128B $r2 = COPY %2:tgpr
144B tBLXr 14, $noreg, %3:tgpr, <regmask $lr $d8 $d9 $d10 $d11 $d12 $d13 $d14 $d15 $q4 $q5 $q6 $q7 $r4 $r5 $r6 $r7 $r8 $r9 $r10 $r11 $s16 $s17 $s18 $s19 $s20 $s21 $s22 $s23 $s24 $s25 $s26 $s27 and 35 more...>, implicit-def dead $lr, implicit $sp, implicit $r0, implicit $r1, implicit $r2, implicit-def $sp
160B ADJCALLSTACKUP 0, 0, 14, $noreg, implicit-def dead $sp,...
2020 Apr 07
2
[ARM] Register pressure with -mthumb forces register reload before each call
If I'm understanding what's going on in this test correctly, what's happening is:
* ARMTargetLowering::LowerCall prefers indirect calls when a function is called at least 3 times in minsize
* In thumb 1 (without -fno-omit-frame-pointer) we have effectively only 3 callee-saved registers (r4-r6)
* The function has three arguments, so those three plus the register we need to hold the
2013 May 21
0
[PATCH] 02-
..."vext.16 q5, q5, q0, #7;\n"
+ "vext.16 q6, q0, q1, #7;\n"
+
+ /* Doing 16 samples filtering at a time */
+ "vmlal.s16 q7, d8, d10;\n"
+ "vmlal.s16 q8, d8, d11;\n"
+ "vmlal.s16 q9, d8, d12;\n"
+ "vmlal.s16 q10, d8, d13;\n"
+
+ /* Reduce filter sum to 16 bits for y output */
+ "vrshrn.s32 d4, q7, %[SIGSHIFT];\n"
+ "vrshrn.s32 d5, q8, %[SIGSHIFT];\n"
+ "vrshrn.s32 d6, q9, %[SIGSHIFT];\n"
+ "vrshrn.s32 d7, q10, %[SIGSHIFT];\n"
+
+ "...
2010 Dec 06
3
[plyr] Question regarding ddply: use of .(as.name(varname)) and varname in ddply function
...49145189, -1.48199933642397,
-1.42815840788069), d1 = c(0.917769870675383, 0.959256755797054,
0.772928570498006, 0.473545787883884, 0.590580940273922, 0.0448629265021484
), l13 = c(0.0803696045647364, -0.291741079837731, -0.00191015929550312,
0.295889063381279, 0.615383505686296, 0.71991154637985), d13 =
c(-1.40821713632015,
-1.27501365601403, -1.41150703235157, 0.708943640186729, 0.276034890463749,
0.663383934998686)), .Names = c("g10", "l1", "d1", "l13", "d13"
), row.names = c(1L, 2L, 3L, 1758L, 1759L, 1760L), class = "data.frame")
-...
2020 Apr 15
4
[ARM] Register pressure with -mthumb forces register reload before each call
...ADJCALLSTACKDOWN 0, 0, 14, $noreg, implicit-def dead $sp, implicit $sp
80B %3:tgpr = tLDRpci %const.0, 14, $noreg :: (load 4 from constant-pool)
96B $r0 = COPY %0:tgpr
112B $r1 = COPY %1:tgpr
128B $r2 = COPY %2:tgpr
144B tBLXr 14, $noreg, %3:tgpr, <regmask $lr $d8 $d9 $d10 $d11 $d12 $d13 $d14 $d15 $q4 $q5 $q6 $q7 $r4 $r5 $r6 $r7 $r8 $r9 $r10 $r11 $s16 $s17 $s18 $s19 $s20 $s21 $s22 $s23 $s24 $s25 $s26 $s27 and 35 more...>, implicit-def dead $lr, implicit $sp, implicit $r0, implicit $r1, implicit $r2, implicit-def $sp
160B ADJCALLSTACKUP 0, 0, 14, $noreg, implicit-def dead $sp,...
2013 May 21
2
[PATCH] 02-Add CELT filter optimizations
..."vext.16 q5, q5, q0, #7;\n"
+ "vext.16 q6, q0, q1, #7;\n"
+
+ /* Doing 16 samples filtering at a time */
+ "vmlal.s16 q7, d8, d10;\n"
+ "vmlal.s16 q8, d8, d11;\n"
+ "vmlal.s16 q9, d8, d12;\n"
+ "vmlal.s16 q10, d8, d13;\n"
+
+ /* Reduce filter sum to 16 bits for y output */
+ "vrshrn.s32 d4, q7, %[SIGSHIFT];\n"
+ "vrshrn.s32 d5, q8, %[SIGSHIFT];\n"
+ "vrshrn.s32 d6, q9, %[SIGSHIFT];\n"
+ "vrshrn.s32 d7, q10, %[SIGSHIFT];\n"
+
+ "...
2007 Feb 08
3
Re: [nut-commits] svn commit r801 - in branches/megatec-usb: . drivers
Hi Alexander,
thanks for your good work on the megatec_usb driver. I have made a few
more (cosmetic) changes.
Is the driver now working stably for your device? In particular, do
the instant commands (and particularly "upsdrvctl -k") work properly?
In this case, we could hopefully mark the device as "supported" and
merge the driver to the main branch.
There is still the
2015 Jul 30
0
[LLVMdev] [3.7.0] Two late issues with cross compilation to mips
...reg260 GPR32:%vreg253
4496B %vreg261<def> = FMUL_D32 %vreg247, %vreg248; AFGR64:%vreg261,%vreg247,%vreg248
4512B ADJCALLSTACKDOWN 16, %SP<imp-def>, %SP<imp-use>
4528B %D6<def> = COPY %vreg243; AFGR64:%vreg243
4544B JAL <ga:@sin>, <regmask %FP %RA %D10 %D11 %D12 %D13 %D14 %D15 %F20 %F21 %F22 %F23 %F24 %F25 %F26 %F27 %F28 %F29 %F30 %F31 %S0 %S1 %S2 %S3 %S4 %S5 %S6 %S7 >, %RA<imp-def,dead>, %D6<imp-use,kill>, %SP<imp-def>, %D0<imp-def>
4560B ADJCALLSTACKUP 16, 0, %SP<imp-def>, %SP<imp-use>
4576B %vreg262<def> = COPY...
2004 Jun 10
1
X-12-ARIMA
...# title="building consents"
# start=1973.01
# span=(1973.01, 2000.12)
# period=12
# file="blp.dat"
# format="datevalue"
# }
# x11{
# mode=mult
# sigmalim=(1.8 2.8)
# seasonalma=x11default
# trendma=13
# appendfcst=no
# save=(b1 c17 d10 d11 d12 d13)
# savelog=(m1 m2 m3 m4 m5 m6 m7 m8 m9 m10 m11 q q2 msr icr fb1 fd8 msf ids)
# }
# execute the x12 fortran pgm. executable x12a stored in /home/fred/x12a
system("/home/fred/x12a/x12a blp")
# read x12 fortran pgm output tables back into R
blp.x12 <- readx12out("blp",...
2015 Jul 30
2
[LLVMdev] [3.7.0] Two late issues with cross compilation to mips
To reduce memory consumption clobbered registers are handled with RegisterMask machine operands which contain a bitset of all registers clobbered.
- Matthias
> On Jul 29, 2015, at 3:00 PM, Daniel Sanders <daniel.sanders at imgtec.com> wrote:
>
> I believe I've identified the problem with almabench but I haven't found the root cause in the compiler yet.
>
> The
2011 Jul 27
3
Help debugging domain builder, qemu upstream and hvmloader
Hello All,
I run into this problem when I modify seabios.
(XEN) hvm.c:1131:d13 Triple fault on VCPU 0 - invoking HVM system reset.
Since there is no fault handlers in the early stages of guest boot I
am in the need to debug the domain builder, upstream qemu and/or
hvmloader to see where exactly the fault is being generated.
I have no experience on debugging and this seems l...
2009 Jan 22
3
Failure to boot from zfs on Sun v880
...ror to a zfs
root. The machine is a Sun V880 (SPARC) running nv_96, with OBP version
4.22.34 which is AFAICT the latest.
The svm mirror was constructed as follows
/
d4 m 18GB d14
d14 s 35GB c1t0d0s0
d24 s 35GB c1t1d0s0
swap
d3 m 16GB d13
d13 s 16GB c1t0d0s3
d13 s 16GB c1t1d0s3
/var
d5 m 8.0GB d15
d15 s 16GB c1t0d0s1
d25 s 16GB c1t1d0s1
I removed c1t1d0 from the mirror:
# metadetach d4 d24
# metaclear d24
# metadetach d3 d23
# metaclear d23
# metadetach d5...
2007 Aug 07
5
Extending RAIDZ.
...39; to RAIDZ vdev, we have something like this:
Disk0 Disk1 Disk2 Disk3 NewDisk
<<P00 D00 D01 D02 U
P01 D03 D04 D05 U
P02 D06>> <<P03 D07>> U
<<P04 D08>> <<P05 D09 U
P06 D10 D11 D12>> U
<<P07 D13 D14 D15>> U
Then we start moving data, but we need to beging from the start:
Disk0 Disk1 Disk2 Disk3 NewDisk
<<N00 D00 D01 D02 D03
N01 D04 D05 D06>> <<P03
D07>> * U U U U
<<P04 D08>> <<P05 D09 U
P06 D1...
2012 Aug 21
2
[LLVMdev] Passing return values on the stack & storing arbitrary sized integers
Fabian,
> here are the definitions of these register classes:
>
> // Data register class
> def DR : RegisterClass<"TriCore", [i32], 32,
> (add D0, D1, D2, D3, D4, D5, D6, D7,
> D8, D9, D10, D11, D12, D13, D14, D15)>;
>
> // Extended-size data register class
> def ER : RegisterClass<"TriCore", [i64], 32,
> (add E0, E2, E4, E6, E8, E10, E12, E14)> {
> let SubRegClasses = [(DR sub_even, sub_odd)];
> }
>
> And the DX and EX registers a...
2007 Dec 03
2
Help replacing dual identity disk in ZFS raidz and SVM mirror
...(of 4) is divided up like this
/ 6GB UFS s0
Swap 8GB s1
/var 6GB UFS s3
Metadb 50MB UFS s4
/data 48GB ZFS s5
For SVM we do a 4 way mirror on /,swap, and /var
So we have 3 SVM mirrors
d0=root (sub mirrors d10, d20, d30, d40)
d1=swap (sub mirrors d11, d21,d31,d41)
d3=/var (sub mirrors d13,d23,d33,d43)
For ZFS we have a single Raidz set across all four disks s5
Everything has worked flawlessly for some time. This week we discovered that one of our 4200''s is reporting some level of failure with regards to one of the disks
We see these recurring errors in the syslog
Dec 3...