Displaying 8 results from an estimated 8 matches for "d12923".
Did you mean:
d1292
2015 Sep 17
2
[PATCH] D12923: Add support for function attribute "notail"
...ting attribute "disable-tail-calls", which disables tail call optimizations on all call sites within the marked function.
>
> The patch to add support for the corresponding source-level function attribute is here:
> http://reviews.llvm.org/D12922
>
> http://reviews.llvm.org/D12923
>
> Files:
> docs/LangRef.rst
> include/llvm/Bitcode/LLVMBitCodes.h
> include/llvm/IR/Attributes.h
> include/llvm/IR/Instructions.h
> lib/AsmParser/LLLexer.cpp
> lib/AsmParser/LLParser.cpp
> lib/AsmParser/LLToken.h
> lib/Bitcode/Reader/BitcodeRe...
2015 Sep 29
2
[PATCH] D12923: Add support for function attribute "notail"
> That was what I had in mind: the function attribute blocks tail call for statically direct calls but doesn't promise
> anything (in fact, does nothing) for indirect calls.
>
> Do you think we shouldn't make any promises for statically direct calls either? I don't see why it's hard to keep the
> promise that direct tail calls will be blocked. Do you have a
2015 Sep 22
2
[PATCH] D12923: Add support for function attribute "notail"
...l-calls", which disables tail call optimizations on all call sites within the marked function.
>>
>> The patch to add support for the corresponding source-level function attribute is here:
>> http://reviews.llvm.org/D12922
>>
>> http://reviews.llvm.org/D12923
>>
>> Files:
>> docs/LangRef.rst
>> include/llvm/Bitcode/LLVMBitCodes.h
>> include/llvm/IR/Attributes.h
>> include/llvm/IR/Instructions.h
>> lib/AsmParser/LLLexer.cpp
>> lib/AsmParser/LLParser.cpp
>>...
2015 Sep 29
2
[PATCH] D12923: Add support for function attribute "notail"
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 10:49 AM, Philip Reames <listmail at philipreames.com>
wrote:
>
>
> On 09/28/2015 10:38 PM, Sanjoy Das wrote:
>
>>
>> > That was what I had in mind: the function attribute blocks tail call
>> for statically direct calls but doesn't promise
>> > anything (in fact, does nothing) for indirect calls.
>> >
>>
2015 Sep 24
2
[PATCH] D12923: Add support for function attribute "notail"
...on.
>>>>>
>>>>> The patch to add support for the corresponding source-level function attribute is here:
>>>>> http://reviews.llvm.org/D12922
>>>>>
>>>>> http://reviews.llvm.org/D12923
>>>>>
>>>>> Files:
>>>>> docs/LangRef.rst
>>>>> include/llvm/Bitcode/LLVMBitCodes.h
>>>>> include/llvm/IR/Attributes.h
>>>>>...
2015 Sep 24
2
[PATCH] D12923: Add support for function attribute "notail"
...l sites within the marked function.
>>>>
>>>> The patch to add support for the corresponding source-level function attribute is here:
>>>> http://reviews.llvm.org/D12922
>>>>
>>>> http://reviews.llvm.org/D12923
>>>>
>>>> Files:
>>>> docs/LangRef.rst
>>>> include/llvm/Bitcode/LLVMBitCodes.h
>>>> include/llvm/IR/Attributes.h
>>>> include/llvm/IR/Instructions.h
>&...
2015 Sep 23
3
[PATCH] D12923: Add support for function attribute "notail"
...il call optimizations on all call sites within the marked function.
>>>
>>> The patch to add support for the corresponding source-level function attribute is here:
>>> http://reviews.llvm.org/D12922
>>>
>>> http://reviews.llvm.org/D12923
>>>
>>> Files:
>>> docs/LangRef.rst
>>> include/llvm/Bitcode/LLVMBitCodes.h
>>> include/llvm/IR/Attributes.h
>>> include/llvm/IR/Instructions.h
>>> lib/AsmParser/LLLexer.cpp...
2015 Nov 04
2
[PATCH] D12923: Add support for function attribute "notail"
I've been discussing the clang-side patch and making changes based on the
feedback I got for the last few weeks. Aaron has reviewed the patch and he
thinks it's OK now.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D12922
Do you have further comments on the llvm-side patch or the semantics of the
function attribute? Since the last time we discussed on the list, I've made
changes to disallow virtual