search for: d11722

...I would like feedback on the overall >>> block design first. >>> >>> I've also implemented the support for reading and >>> writing the bitcode blocks in the following patch: >>> http://reviews.llvm.org/D11722 >>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__reviews.llvm.org_D11722&d=AwMFaQ&c=8hUWFZcy2Z-Za5rBPlktOQ&r=Mfk2qtn1LTDThVkh6-oGglNfMADXfJdty4_bhmuhMHA&m=oUy_PB_mSfRgDO7H7bZOR04gv_DMzX5rPO_lv4PHt60&s=WVxrKkHnjKr75fCQ-UkGke8dk6KpZcFCnLWVrJ3G188&am...

Hi all, I updated the patches to remove the native object wrapper format. As suggested we will work on getting the ThinLTO framework in place using bitcode first, and then work on adding the native object support. As noted in this RFC and in the associated patch D11722, for now I have empty ThinLTO blocks with no records, since I wanted to get feedback on the overall block design first. The RFC discusses this in more detail, but one of the main ideas is to leverage the existing value symbol table block in the module to avoid duplicating function symbol strings, e...

...t record >> format, as I would like feedback on the overall block design >> first. >> >> I've also implemented the support for reading and writing the >> bitcode blocks in the following patch: >> http://reviews.llvm.org/D11722 >> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__reviews.llvm.org_D11722&d=AwMFaQ&c=8hUWFZcy2Z-Za5rBPlktOQ&r=Mfk2qtn1LTDThVkh6-oGglNfMADXfJdty4_bhmuhMHA&m=oUy_PB_mSfRgDO7H7bZOR04gv_DMzX5rPO_lv4PHt60&s=WVxrKkHnjKr75fCQ-UkGke8dk6KpZcFCnLWVrJ3G188&e=>...

...native object wrapped cases. It doesn't yet > define the exact record format, as I would like feedback on the overall > block design first. > > I've also implemented the support for reading and writing the bitcode > blocks in the following patch: > http://reviews.llvm.org/D11722 > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__reviews.llvm.org_D11722&d=AwMFaQ&c=8hUWFZcy2Z-Za5rBPlktOQ&r=Mfk2qtn1LTDThVkh6-oGglNfMADXfJdty4_bhmuhMHA&m=oUy_PB_mSfRgDO7H7bZOR04gv_DMzX5rPO_lv4PHt60&s=WVxrKkHnjKr75fCQ-UkGke8dk6KpZcFCnLWVrJ3G188&e=> > > T...

...both in the bitcode-only and native object wrapped cases. It doesn't yet define the exact record format, as I would like feedback on the overall block design first. I've also implemented the support for reading and writing the bitcode blocks in the following patch: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11722 The ThinLTO data structures and the file APIs are described in a separate RFC I will be sending simultaneously, with pointers to the patches implementing them. Looking forward to your feedback. Thanks! Teresa ThinLTO File Format Bitcode ThinLTO Support ThinLTO Bitcode Blocks THINLTO...