Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "d0a09e82".
2012 May 11
0
[LLVMdev] Scheduler Roadmap
Thanks for helping explain the infrastructure. One ammendment...
On May 11, 2012, at 11:28 AM, Sergei Larin <slarin at codeaurora.org> wrote:
> [Larin, Sergei] Kind of. Once bundles are finalized, bundle header become a
> new "super instructions", and if a pass does not need to look at individual
> (MI) instructions, there will not be any difference for it. But if a pass
2012 Oct 16
2
[LLVMdev] MI DAG constructor indeterminism
...onsider this a bug.
Thanks.
Sergei
---
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by
The Linux Foundation
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20121016/d0a09e82/attachment.html>
2012 May 11
6
[LLVMdev] Scheduler Roadmap
Dave,
Thank you for your interest. Please see my replies below. Sorry that my
terminology is not as crisp as Andy's, but I think you can see what I mean.
Sergei
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dag at cray.com [mailto:dag at cray.com]
> Sent: Friday, May 11, 2012 12:14 PM
> To: Sergei Larin
> Cc: