search for: cynicbytrad

I've updated my krb5 cross-realm auth patch for dovecot 1.1-rc4; there are not any (intentional) changes in functionality from the last patch, the diff just didn't apply cleanly anymore. As before the most recent version of the patch is available at: http://zinux.cynicbytrade.com/svn/servers/dovecot/cross-realm.diff.bz2 I see the cross-realm patch for Solaris made it into the mainline. What if anything can I do to encourage the mainline adoption of my non- Solaris patch? Zach -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smim...

...Timestamp: 00005ms SCall: 00002 DCall: 00000 [64.2.142.31:4569] USERNAME : profplump REFRESH : 60 Tx-Frame Retry[000] -- OSeqno: 000 ISeqno: 000 Type: IAX Subclass: REGREQ Timestamp: 00005ms SCall: 00006 DCall: 00000 [64.2.142.31:4569] USERNAME : cynicbytrade REFRESH : 60 Rx-Frame Retry[ No] -- OSeqno: 000 ISeqno: 001 Type: IAX Subclass: REGAUTH Timestamp: 00007ms SCall: 00003 DCall: 00002 [64.2.142.31:4569] AUTHMETHODS : 3 CHALLENGE : 204017331 USERNAME : profplump Tx-Frame Retry[000] -- OSeqno: 00...

I've written a GSSAPI cross-realm auth patch for people not lucky enough to have the __gss_userok function, though it should apply pretty cleanly with that patch in place as well. The patch is available at: http://zinux.cynicbytrade.com/svn/servers/dovecot/cross-realm.diff.bz2 It works for me on MIT-kerb, and I tested compilation against heimdal, but I don't have a cross-realm setup to test functionality under heimdal (though I also have no reason to think it wouldn't work). Since neither MIT nor heimdal provide a...

Hi all, I have setup two multipath route tables on my system for doing failover routing, What I want it''s that if GW at route1 of the MP is dead, traffic goes by route2, for doing that I have created the multipath routes as follows: ip route add table mail.traffic proto static nexthop via ${GW1} dev eth1 weight 1 nexthop via ${GW2} dev eth1 weight 250 But it does not run as I

Has any one ever done it? We are in the planning stages and the majority of the hardware we have available is PPC, what are some thoughts? _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/