search for: cxx_generalized_initializers

Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "cxx_generalized_initializers".

2015 Feb 16
2
[LLVMdev] Do we still need LLVM_HAS_INITIALIZER_LISTS?
Currently, LLVM_HAS_INITIALIZER_LISTS is set based on __has_feature(cxx_generalized_initializers) && !defined(_MSC_VER) Based on the docs, we should be able to drop the _MSC_VER check now that we've moved to VS2013. Can somebody confirm that? The other problem is that GCC doesn't recognize __has_feature, so this is essentially only enabled for clang. If we're keeping this...
2015 Feb 17
2
[LLVMdev] Do we still need LLVM_HAS_INITIALIZER_LISTS?
...n, Feb 16, 2015 at 10:30 PM, David Majnemer <david.majnemer at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 3:56 PM, Justin Bogner <mail at justinbogner.com> > wrote: >> >> Currently, LLVM_HAS_INITIALIZER_LISTS is set based on >> >> __has_feature(cxx_generalized_initializers) && !defined(_MSC_VER) >> >> Based on the docs, we should be able to drop the _MSC_VER check now that >> we've moved to VS2013. Can somebody confirm that? >> > > MSDN claims that VS2013 supports braced initializer list syntax: > https://msdn.microsoft.co...