search for: cxtxdx

...e of the feature which we liked in Veritas, apart from the obvious ones is the ability to call the disks by name and group them in to a disk group. Especially in SAN based environment where the disks may be shared by multiple machines, it is very easy to manage them by disk group names rather than cxtxdx numbers. Does zfs offer such capabilities? thanks in advance for the help. This message posted from opensolaris.org

...d1 ONLINE c3t50060xxxxxxxxxxCd0 UNAVAIL cannot open Now, it''s working up to the point at which it''s worked out that the bits of the pool are in the right places. It just can''t open all the bits. Why is that? I notice that it''s using the underlying cXtXdX device names rather than the virtual emcpower{0,1} names. However, rather more worrying is that if I try to create a new pool, then it correctly fails if I use the cXtXdX device (warning me that it contains part of a pool) but if I go through the emcpower devices then I don''t get a warning...

OK, I''ve been putting off this question for a while now, but it eating at me, so I can''t hold off any more. I have a nice 8 gig memory stick I''ve formated with the ZFS file system. Works great on all my Solaris PC''s, but refuses to work on my Sparc processor. So I''ve formated it on my Sparc machine (Blade 2500), works great there now, but not on

This past weekend, but holiday was ruined due to a log device "replacement" gone awry. I posted all about it here: http://jmlittle.blogspot.com/2008/05/problem-with-slogs-how-i-lost.html In a nutshell, an resilver of a single log device with itself, due to the fact one can''t remove a log device from a pool once defined, cause ZFS to fully resilver but then attach the log

hello, all I am have constraint disk space (only 8GB) while running os inside vm. Now i want to add more. It is easy to add for vm but how can i update fs in os? I cannot use autoexpand because it doesn''t implemented in my system: $ uname -a SunOS sopen 5.11 snv_111b i86pc i386 i86pc If it was 171 it would be grate, right? Doing following: o added new virtual HDD (it becomes