Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "cxstoreddiagnostic".
2017 Dec 05
9
Who wants faster LLVM/Clang builds?
...-57.4%
tools/driver/cc1_main.cpp 2.26 0.97 -57.1%
unittests/CodeGen/BufferSourceTest.cpp 3.08 1.83 -40.6%
lib/CodeGen/CGLoopInfo.cpp 1.91 1.34 -29.9%
unittests/Tooling/RefactoringActionRulesTest.cpp 2.46 1.79 -27.0%
unittests/CodeGen/CodeGenExternalTest.cpp 3.43 2.52 -26.5%
tools/libclang/CXStoredDiagnostic.cpp 1.67 1.26 -24.8%
tools/clang-func-mapping/ClangFnMapGen.cpp 2.48 1.89 -23.8%
Full list:
The corresponding patches (careful, they are big):
Methodology
My tool took the compile_commands.json from LLVM build and iterated over files trying to remove redundant headers. To find which header...
2017 Dec 06
3
Who wants faster LLVM/Clang builds?
...iver/cc1_main.cpp 2.26 0.97 -57.1%
> unittests/CodeGen/BufferSourceTest.cpp 3.08 1.83 -40.6%
> lib/CodeGen/CGLoopInfo.cpp 1.91 1.34 -29.9%
> unittests/Tooling/RefactoringActionRulesTest.cpp 2.46 1.79 -27.0%
> unittests/CodeGen/CodeGenExternalTest.cpp 3.43 2.52 -26.5%
> tools/libclang/CXStoredDiagnostic.cpp 1.67 1.26 -24.8%
> tools/clang-func-mapping/ClangFnMapGen.cpp 2.48 1.89 -23.8%
>
> Full list:
> <clang.txt>
>
> The corresponding patches (careful, they are big):
> <llvm_redundant_headers.patch>
> <clang_redundant_headers.patch>
>
> *Methodology*...
2017 Dec 06
2
Who wants faster LLVM/Clang builds?
...iver/cc1_main.cpp 2.26 0.97 -57.1%
> unittests/CodeGen/BufferSourceTest.cpp 3.08 1.83 -40.6%
> lib/CodeGen/CGLoopInfo.cpp 1.91 1.34 -29.9%
> unittests/Tooling/RefactoringActionRulesTest.cpp 2.46 1.79 -27.0%
> unittests/CodeGen/CodeGenExternalTest.cpp 3.43 2.52 -26.5%
> tools/libclang/CXStoredDiagnostic.cpp 1.67 1.26 -24.8%
> tools/clang-func-mapping/ClangFnMapGen.cpp 2.48 1.89 -23.8%
>
> Full list:
>
> <clang.txt>
>
>
> The corresponding patches (careful, they are big):
>
> <llvm_redundant_headers.patch>
> <clang_redundant_headers.patch>
>
>...
2015 Jul 08
2
[LLVMdev] Building clang + libc++ + libc++abi
[Sorry about the crosspost. Since this is a clang build question but
the build is invoked from the top-level LLVM directory I'm not sure
where the question should go.]
I've got a clang build against libstdc++ on Linux but I would really
like one built against libc++/libc++abi. In other words I'd like to
rebuild clang/llvm with clang using libc++ and libc++abi on Linux.
I looked at
2017 Dec 06
2
[cfe-dev] Who wants faster LLVM/Clang builds?
...26 0.97 -57.1%
>> unittests/CodeGen/BufferSourceTest.cpp 3.08 1.83 -40.6%
>> lib/CodeGen/CGLoopInfo.cpp 1.91 1.34 -29.9%
>> unittests/Tooling/RefactoringActionRulesTest.cpp 2.46 1.79 -27.0%
>> unittests/CodeGen/CodeGenExternalTest.cpp 3.43 2.52 -26.5%
>> tools/libclang/CXStoredDiagnostic.cpp 1.67 1.26 -24.8%
>> tools/clang-func-mapping/ClangFnMapGen.cpp 2.48 1.89 -23.8%
>>
>> Full list:
>>
>> <clang.txt>
>>
>>
>> The corresponding patches (careful, they are big):
>>
>> <llvm_redundant_headers.patch>
>> &l...
2015 Jul 08
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Building clang + libc++ + libc++abi
...dir/CIndexer.cpp.o
> CMakeFiles/libclang.dir/CXComment.cpp.o
> CMakeFiles/libclang.dir/CXCursor.cpp.o
> CMakeFiles/libclang.dir/CXCompilationDatabase.cpp.o
> CMakeFiles/libclang.dir/CXLoadedDiagnostic.cpp.o
> CMakeFiles/libclang.dir/CXSourceLocation.cpp.o
> CMakeFiles/libclang.dir/CXStoredDiagnostic.cpp.o
> CMakeFiles/libclang.dir/CXString.cpp.o CMakeFiles/libclang.dir/CXType.cpp.o
> CMakeFiles/libclang.dir/IndexBody.cpp.o
> CMakeFiles/libclang.dir/IndexDecl.cpp.o
> CMakeFiles/libclang.dir/IndexTypeSourceInfo.cpp.o
> CMakeFiles/libclang.dir/Indexing.cpp.o
> CMakeFiles/libclan...
2017 Dec 06
2
[cfe-dev] Who wants faster LLVM/Clang builds?
...7 -57.1%
>> unittests/CodeGen/BufferSourceTest.cpp 3.08 1.83 -40.6%
>> lib/CodeGen/CGLoopInfo.cpp 1.91 1.34 -29.9%
>> unittests/Tooling/RefactoringActionRulesTest.cpp 2.46 1.79 -27.0%
>> unittests/CodeGen/CodeGenExternalTest.cpp 3.43 2.52 -26.5%
>> tools/libclang/CXStoredDiagnostic.cpp 1.67 1.26 -24.8%
>> tools/clang-func-mapping/ClangFnMapGen.cpp 2.48 1.89 -23.8%
>>
>> Full list:
>> <clang.txt>
>>
>> The corresponding patches (careful, they are big):
>> <llvm_redundant_headers.patch>
>> <clang_redundant_head...