search for: cwebster

On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 07:32:19 +0100 Ned Slider wrote: > > Johnny's announcement refers to: > > firefox-45.2.0-1.el5.centos.src.rpm > > firefox-45.2.0-1.el6.centos.src.rpm > > firefox-45.2.0-1.el7.centos.src.rpm > > > > The linked rhel webpage refers to: > > firefox-45.2.0-1.el5_11.src.rpm > > firefox-45.2.0-1.el6_8.src.rpm > >

...necessary. Otherwise, unless another RHEL subscriber has the same issue, you'd have to wait for the community to fix something then get it integrated into RHEL before filtering down to CentOS. If this is acceptable then CentOS is an option. > On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 12:29 PM, Cal Webster <cwebster at ec.rr.com> wrote: > > On Thu, 2014-12-04 at 11:41 -0500, Jason Ricles wrote: > >> Gotcha, I also work with DoD for Navy systems and was surprised by > >> that. So you mean if we don't want to pay RHEL licensing fees, we can > >> use Centos? Since we are pa...

On Thu, 2014-12-04 at 11:41 -0500, Jason Ricles wrote: > Gotcha, I also work with DoD for Navy systems and was surprised by > that. So you mean if we don't want to pay RHEL licensing fees, we can > use Centos? Since we are paying about $100 per RHEL license. I would recommend RHEL for critical systems or those that must be certified for a particular purpose, such as CA servers.

I'm getting yum update errors when attempting to update nss: --> Finished Dependency Resolution Error: Package: nss-3.12.10-2.el6_1.x86_64 (updates) Requires: nss-softokn(x86-64) >= 3.12.9 Installed: nss-softokn-3.12.7-1.1.el6.x86_64 (@anaconda-CentOS-201106060106.x86_64/6.0) nss-softokn(x86-64) = 3.12.7-1.1.el6 I realize I need to swap in the 6.1 ISO on our internal mirror

That is true, which we are using ours for critical things. Guess RHEL will be the way to go till Centos is maybe approved for critical systems as well. On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 12:29 PM, Cal Webster <cwebster at ec.rr.com> wrote: > On Thu, 2014-12-04 at 11:41 -0500, Jason Ricles wrote: >> Gotcha, I also work with DoD for Navy systems and was surprised by >> that. So you mean if we don't want to pay RHEL licensing fees, we can >> use Centos? Since we are paying about $100 per...

Does anyone know the time-frame when security updates might be published for these applications in CentOS 5? wireshark postgresql krb5 java-1.6.0-openjdk java-1.6.0-sun The following security updates have been published upstream (after release of RHEL 5.6) to remedy the vulnerabilities described in their associated CVE reports. Remotely Exploitable: (R) RHSA-2011:0013: Moderate: wireshark

I thought DoD used RHEL and not Centos, or did Centos did approved DADEMS recently? On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 5:34 PM, Cal Webster <cwebster at ec.rr.com> wrote: > Can anyone help with getting the new DoD CACs (Smart Card) to work in > CentOS 6.6? I don't use it for console logins, only for email and .mil > web sites. > > I recently had to get a new DoD CAC (Smart Card) when one of the > buildings I work in upgr...

...ose from FC19 Add comments in change log [iseo at jato SPECS]$ vi rdesktop.spec ----------------------------------- Version: 1.7.1 Release: 2%{?dist}.1.iseo ... Patch0: %{name}-libao.patch ... %prep %setup -q %patch0 -p1 -b .ao ... %changelog * Fri Nov 1 2013 Cal Webster <cwebster at bizec.rr.com> 1.7.1-2 - Latest version not available upstream - This version from FC19 - Fixes regression errors (NOT IMPLEMENTED RDP5 opcodes, get cursor, etc) - Fixes mouse cursor not changing and background showing through - Fixes freeze on remote system - See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/s...

...based on my experience, for use in all non-certified enterprise operations (large and small) on general-purpose computers. RHEL is, of course, the better alternative when you require the upstream vendor's certified platform, certified and tested integrated solutions, industry-leading support, or customized solutions. Their offerings are a bargain when you consider the benefits they provide

Can anyone help with getting the new DoD CACs (Smart Card) to work in CentOS 6.6? I don't use it for console logins, only for email and .mil web sites. I recently had to get a new DoD CAC (Smart Card) when one of the buildings I work in upgraded their security system. My old CAC was working fine prior to this for signing and encrypting email and for authenticating to various DoD (.mil) sites

Dear List: Can anyone tell me the resource footprint of a minimal Xen VM? In other words, how much CPU, memory, disk resources are required to run 1 VM with, for example, a simple 1.68 MB LEAF distro? I''m preparing to create a virtual network to test various LEAF routers and I''m trying to decide whether to use UML or Xen. VMware, which I already have, is out of the question

...ut). I am located in SW England and am finding it hard to locate another developer who is up to speed on RoR. So far all the ones I have spoken to have been sympathetic when they have seen what''s has been done (and not) to my site but are unable to help me rectify it. Please contact me on cwebster1-IWqWACnzNjwqdlJmJB21zg@public.gmane.org or call 01626 834226 if you are a RoR web bod who can help me - with a view to taking over the maintainance contract and future development work in addition to putting right the outstanding stuff that needs sorting. Caroline --~--~---------~--~----~------...

On Thu, 2014-12-04 at 11:30 -0500, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > Cal Webster wrote: > > On Thu, 2014-12-04 at 08:08 -0500, mark wrote: > >> On 12/03/14 17:34, Cal Webster wrote: > >> > Can anyone help with getting the new DoD CACs (Smart Card) to work in > >> > CentOS 6.6? I don't use it for console logins, only for email and .mil > >> > web

On Thu, 2014-12-04 at 08:08 -0500, mark wrote: > On 12/03/14 17:34, Cal Webster wrote: > > Can anyone help with getting the new DoD CACs (Smart Card) to work in > > CentOS 6.6? I don't use it for console logins, only for email and .mil > > web sites. > > > > I recently had to get a new DoD CAC (Smart Card) when one of the > > buildings I work in upgraded

See Red Hat Bugzilla bug #846852 for details. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846852 FYI: We discovered that after updating to EL 6.3 on our x86_64 server, autofs 5.0.5-54 broke our nightly backups that rely on automounting an NFS share hosted on another EL 6 machine on our local network. The machine hosting NFS server was configured to allow only TCP connections to the port

We began experiencing failed vnc connections to the console display on servers that have been updated to EL 6.3. No such failures have occurred on similar connections to EL 6.2 servers. On the client machine a normal vncviewer display appears with the expected graphical login until the mouse pointer is moved within the boundaries of the vncviewer window. At this point the window closes and an