Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "cvsps".
Did you mean:
cvs's
2006 Nov 29
0
[LLVMdev] moving to svn?
Hi Chris,
> 2. The main deficiencies of CVS don't impact us much (we aren't
> hampered by lack of atomic commits, renames, and better branch
> facilities).
If people would like to see the logical `patch set' that made up a CVS
commit then cvsps may be useful, or, as others have said, use Tailor to
convert to a local repos. in your preferred format.
http://www.cobite.com/cvsps/
http://www.darcs.net/DarcsWiki/Tailor
> 4. I maintain that a real distributed VCS would be very useful for
> LLVM, perhaps moreso than the other fea...
2006 Nov 28
2
[LLVMdev] moving to svn?
On Tue, 28 Nov 2006, Bill Wendling wrote:
> Perhaps someone could come up with a list of different versioning
> software, list the pros and cons, and then we could vote? (Has anyone
> mentioned Bitkeeper yet? :-)
There are a couple reasons we are using CVS still:
1. CVS works and is well understood by all involved.
2. The main deficiencies of CVS don't impact us much (we aren't
2005 Aug 09
43
Some patches.
Hi,
in my path of getting the controls sample to work nicely, I fixed some
classes on the way, see the attached diffs. I had some difficulties, but
could track down all stupid bugs and am now almost happy with the code
:)
(I had the complete ImageHandler hieracy implemented at some time, but
than I discovered the error was not in unloaded ImageHandlers but in the
controls-program which does not