search for: cvdebugrecord

...lib/MC/MCCodeView includes several llvm/DebugInfo/CodeView headers I guess MC could be made dependent on DebugInfoCodeView? But probably these things should be sunk into BinaryFormat as is the case for DWARF features used by MC? include/llvm/Object/COFF.h includes include/llvm/DebugInfo/CodeView/CVDebugRecord.h Also seems like this could/should/needs to be sunk into BinaryFormat? I'm open to ideas & happy to do the work, or help in any way that might be useful. Thanks, - Dave -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/l...

...t; features used by MC? >> > > I'd be OK with that. We could very easily introduce true link dependencies > on that library in the near future. > OK - added the LLVMBuild.txt change in r328595 > include/llvm/Object/COFF.h includes >> include/llvm/DebugInfo/CodeView/CVDebugRecord.h >> Also seems like this could/should/needs to be sunk into BinaryFormat? >> > > These things are really more PE/PDB related than CodeView. They are in the > wrong place. I'd ask Saleem to help find a new home. Object or > BinaryFormats seem OK to me. > Moved it t...

...; these things should be sunk into BinaryFormat as is the case for DWARF > features used by MC? > I'd be OK with that. We could very easily introduce true link dependencies on that library in the near future. > include/llvm/Object/COFF.h includes > include/llvm/DebugInfo/CodeView/CVDebugRecord.h > Also seems like this could/should/needs to be sunk into BinaryFormat? > These things are really more PE/PDB related than CodeView. They are in the wrong place. I'd ask Saleem to help find a new home. Object or BinaryFormats seem OK to me. > I'm open to ideas & happy to...

...veral llvm/DebugInfo/CodeView headers > I guess MC could be made dependent on DebugInfoCodeView? But probably > these things should be sunk into BinaryFormat as is the case for DWARF > features used by MC? > > include/llvm/Object/COFF.h includes > include/llvm/DebugInfo/CodeView/CVDebugRecord.h > Also seems like this could/should/needs to be sunk into BinaryFormat? > > I'm open to ideas & happy to do the work, or help in any way that might be > useful. > > Thanks, > - Dave > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:...

...eView headers >> I guess MC could be made dependent on DebugInfoCodeView? But probably >> these things should be sunk into BinaryFormat as is the case for DWARF >> features used by MC? >> >> include/llvm/Object/COFF.h includes >> include/llvm/DebugInfo/CodeView/CVDebugRecord.h >> Also seems like this could/should/needs to be sunk into BinaryFormat? >> >> I'm open to ideas & happy to do the work, or help in any way that might >> be useful. >> >> Thanks, >> - Dave >> > -------------- next part -------------- An...

...iewError.h, > RecordSerialization.h - maybe some of those aren't needed, if they're > excessive includes or the like (they tend to seep in all over the place)) > > >> >> >>> include/llvm/Object/COFF.h includes >>>> include/llvm/DebugInfo/CodeView/CVDebugRecord.h >>>> Also seems like this could/should/needs to be sunk into BinaryFormat? >>>> >>> >>> These things are really more PE/PDB related than CodeView. They are in >>> the wrong place. I'd ask Saleem to help find a new home. Object or >>&g...

...ef, TypeIndex.h, CVRecord.h, CodeViewError.h, RecordSerialization.h - maybe some of those aren't needed, if they're excessive includes or the like (they tend to seep in all over the place)) > > >> include/llvm/Object/COFF.h includes >>> include/llvm/DebugInfo/CodeView/CVDebugRecord.h >>> Also seems like this could/should/needs to be sunk into BinaryFormat? >>> >> >> These things are really more PE/PDB related than CodeView. They are in >> the wrong place. I'd ask Saleem to help find a new home. Object or >> BinaryFormats seem OK...

...lib/MC/MCCodeView includes several llvm/DebugInfo/CodeView headers I guess MC could be made dependent on DebugInfoCodeView? But probably these things should be sunk into BinaryFormat as is the case for DWARF features used by MC? include/llvm/Object/COFF.h includes include/llvm/DebugInfo/CodeView/CVDebugRecord.h Also seems like this could/should/needs to be sunk into BinaryFormat? I'm open to ideas & happy to do the work, or help in any way that might be useful. Thanks, - Dave -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/l...

...veral llvm/DebugInfo/CodeView headers > I guess MC could be made dependent on DebugInfoCodeView? But probably > these things should be sunk into BinaryFormat as is the case for DWARF > features used by MC? > > include/llvm/Object/COFF.h includes > include/llvm/DebugInfo/CodeView/CVDebugRecord.h > Also seems like this could/should/needs to be sunk into BinaryFormat? > > I'm open to ideas & happy to do the work, or help in any way that might be > useful. > > Thanks, > - Dave > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed......

...lization.h - maybe some of those aren't needed, if they're >> excessive includes or the like (they tend to seep in all over the place)) >> >> >>> >>> >>>> include/llvm/Object/COFF.h includes >>>>> include/llvm/DebugInfo/CodeView/CVDebugRecord.h >>>>> Also seems like this could/should/needs to be sunk into BinaryFormat? >>>>> >>>> >>>> These things are really more PE/PDB related than CodeView. They are in >>>> the wrong place. I'd ask Saleem to help find a new home....

...hose aren't needed, if they're >>> excessive includes or the like (they tend to seep in all over the place)) >>> >>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> include/llvm/Object/COFF.h includes >>>>>> include/llvm/DebugInfo/CodeView/CVDebugRecord.h >>>>>> Also seems like this could/should/needs to be sunk into >>>>>> BinaryFormat? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> These things are really more PE/PDB related than CodeView. They are in >>>>> the wrong place....