search for: curtailment

So after about 4 hours struggling with Try and TryCatch I am throwing in the towel. I have a more complicated function that used logspline through iterative distributions and at some point the logspline doesnt function correctly for some subsets but is fine with others so I need to be able to identify when the error occurs and stop curtailing the distribution and I think this Try or TryCatch

Would someone kindly share some definition into the following? Openphone version 1.91 includes dual sets of Speex codec's starting with: SpeexNarrow-5.95k{sw} SpeexNarrow-5.95k{Xiph} Through SpeexNarrow-18.2k{sw} SpeexNarrow-18.2k{Xiph} I do not understand what the differences are between {sw} & {Xiph} given the same bit rate for both? Are all of these Narrow or Wide or Ultrawide

Hmisc Version 3.3-2 has been posted to the CRAN repository. Change Log 3.3-2 4/26/2007 Fixed bug with combine<- function not handling NULL values. 3.3-1 3/29/2007 Created functions trunc.POSIXt, ceil.POSIXt, round.POSIXt to do those ops on POSIXt objects. Removed chron versions of these functions. Placed Hmisc in a namespace Factored out category

Hmisc Version 3.3-2 has been posted to the CRAN repository. Change Log 3.3-2 4/26/2007 Fixed bug with combine<- function not handling NULL values. 3.3-1 3/29/2007 Created functions trunc.POSIXt, ceil.POSIXt, round.POSIXt to do those ops on POSIXt objects. Removed chron versions of these functions. Placed Hmisc in a namespace Factored out category

On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 2:05 PM Chris Lattner via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Saleem, Owen, others on the thread who are concerned about this: it seems that some of the concern is that the project goals are too narrow, and thus the eventual result may not serve the full community well over time. May be my email listing our goals is being misinterpreted as being

Listmates, I am experiencing some quirks with the new ATI 8.1 (8.452) driver and compiz-fusion on 10.3. Of note are: (1) Invoking the run command with Alt+F2 correctly opens the run dialog, but the cursor is frozen and will not take any input _until_ the "Options" button is clicked or activated with Alt+o. Then the cursor begins blinking normally and input is possible. If the

...vation. libstdc++ > has a ton of useful functionality (debug mode, profile mode, etc.). Does > libc++ plan to reproduce that? debug mode yes. It isn't there yet. And I would like to limit it to being ABI compatible with release mode. This will entail significant debug functionality curtailment, but also eliminate numerous errors I've seen when debug mode and release mode get accidentally mixed. > What's driving libc++? The possibility of being a superior solution. ---------------- // Container overhead example #include <iostream> #include <deque> #include <...

...ot otherwise been employed, conditional power has been used for the futility rule. So naturally, that was my first thought (although I may well be wrong) in this case. I have done RSiteSearch() with the following terms (three different searches): futility analysis conditional power stochastic curtailment Nothing that looked relevant to my problem jumped out at me. I have read, somewhat recently, that there are problems with conditional power, although I don't remember the details at the moment. This has prompted me to consider other approaches to the problem. One simple thing that has occur...

Hi, Ivan: My $0.02. hasZeroCostLooping() disabling unrolling dose not seem to be appropriate for other architectures, at least the one I worked before. You mentioned: >Currently, we cannot detect them because the loop unroller is >unrolling them before entering into the codegen. Looking at its implementation, >it. Could you please articulate why CG fail to recognize it?

Prof Nash, Prof Galanos Is it possible to use a generic code stub in front of packages that use optimx to improve optimx use or curtail it according to the requirements? Best Regards Amit +91 7899381263 ________________________________________________________________________ Please request Skype as available 5th Year FPM (Ph.D.) in Finance and Accounting Area Indian Institute

Hi Hal, On 21/11/2012 22:38, Hal Finkel wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Ivan Llopard" <ivanllopard at gmail.com> >> To: "LLVM Developers Mailing List" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> >> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 10:31:07 AM >> Subject: [LLVMdev] Disable loop unroll pass >> >> Hi, >> >> We've a

Dear R helpers, (At the outset I sincerely apologize if I have not put forward my following query properly, though I have tried to do so.) Following is a curtailed part of my R - code where I am trying to generate say 100 random no.s for each of the products under consideration. library(plyr) n = 100 my_code = function(product, output_avg, output_stdev)     { BUR_mc = rnorm(n, output_avg,

On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 11:18 PM Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Chandler Carruth" <chandlerc at google.com> > > To: "Sanjoy Das" <sanjoy at playingwithpointers.com>, "Hal Finkel" < > hfinkel at anl.gov> > > Cc: "llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>,

...s a ton of useful functionality (debug mode, profile mode, > > etc.). Does libc++ plan to reproduce that? > > debug mode yes. It isn't there yet. And I would like to limit it to being > ABI compatible with release mode. This will entail significant debug > functionality curtailment, but also eliminate numerous errors I've seen > when debug mode and release mode get accidentally mixed. Ouch. I hope libc++ doesn't give up any debug functionality. It's indispensable. I think the ABI compatibility is worth it, but then I've never run into significant prob...

"Scott Techlist" <techlist06 at msws.org> writes: > Currently my POP users have a max mbox size but that is how much it > will store before they "come get it". I ensure they have at least one > device set to delete from the server periodically (i.e. 1 week). So > users with multiple devices get their mail duplciated on their devices > and at least one

Dear friends. I hope you will bear over with a lengthy question. I have a problem of 76 patients on hemodialysis measured repeatedly once a month for nine months for methylmalonic acid and vitamin B12. The vitamin had been administered previously to these patients but was curtailed in the first part and then started again. There was a very clear response in that as vitamin B12 went down

I have 4 hard drives on my system. CentOS is in a logical partition on the first hard drive and there is a swap partition in a logical partition on the first hard drive which I have also told it to use. The other three hard drives contain various partitions, all of which I have hidden from CentOS which are primary partitions. I have as well hidden the primary partitions on the first hard drive

...ementations to produce probabilities via Probability Estimation Trees. First results can be obtained using RWeka and other packages in addition but moreover I am looking for advanced algorithms implemented in R / RWeka. These include especially m-Estimate and m-Branch for smoothing probabilities, curtailment of trees, Kernel Density, weights in tree leafs as well as implementations of specific developed algorithms like Random Decision Tree, Confusion Tree Factor or Newton Trees for R/RWeka. Although I am aware that chance for positive replies regarding this matter is very low I decided to give this a...

Hello, all! My program is written on Borland C Builder 6 Not properly method TForm-> Show () works; And on operational system Ubunto 10.10 it works properly, and already in Ubuntu 11.10 method TForm-> Show () works not properly. Elements of a window receive focus of input from the keyboard, and the window remains not active! The heading of a window and is not painted in color of an active

This is a repost of the RCU patch I have posted some time ago. The only change from the previous post, was to move it to a more recent version of xen-unstable (changeset 13386). I am planning to submit the following additional patches, after this one is accepted: 1) rename_find_domain.patch: Rename find_domain_by_id() to get_domain_by_id() 2) add_find_domain.patch: Add new