Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "cursor_saved_y".
Did you mean:
cursor_saved_x
2010 May 09
0
[PATCH] drm/nouveau: allow cursor image and position to survive suspend
...a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_crtc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_crtc.h
index 49fa7b2..cb1ce2a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_crtc.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_crtc.h
@@ -40,6 +40,8 @@ struct nouveau_crtc {
int sharpness;
int last_dpms;
+ int cursor_saved_x, cursor_saved_y;
+
struct {
int cpp;
bool blanked;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drv.c
index 1de974a..4bccba3 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drv.c
@@ -177,6 +177,13 @@ nouveau_pci_suspend(struct...
2015 Jan 05
2
drm/nouveau: dont switch vt on suspend
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at ubuntu.com>
---
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fbcon.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fbcon.c
index 3ed12a8cfc91..a4a586807903 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fbcon.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fbcon.c
@@ -370,6 +370,7 @@ nouveau_fbcon_create(struct drm_fb_helper *helper,
ret = -ENOMEM;
goto
2011 Oct 09
11
[PATCH 01/10]: nouveau: assorted fixes
Hi,
Here is my patch queue I accumulated over quite a long time.
Patches 1-6 are bugfixes, and rest is mostly RFC.
Comments are welcome.
Best regards,
Maxim Levitsky
2023 Jul 12
8
[PATCH RFC v1 00/52] drm/crtc: Rename struct drm_crtc::dev to drm_dev
Hello,
while I debugged an issue in the imx-lcdc driver I was constantly
irritated about struct drm_device pointer variables being named "dev"
because with that name I usually expect a struct device pointer.
I think there is a big benefit when these are all renamed to "drm_dev".
I have no strong preference here though, so "drmdev" or "drm" are fine
for me,
2023 Jul 12
8
[PATCH RFC v1 00/52] drm/crtc: Rename struct drm_crtc::dev to drm_dev
Hello,
while I debugged an issue in the imx-lcdc driver I was constantly
irritated about struct drm_device pointer variables being named "dev"
because with that name I usually expect a struct device pointer.
I think there is a big benefit when these are all renamed to "drm_dev".
I have no strong preference here though, so "drmdev" or "drm" are fine
for me,