search for: cursor_saved_i

- This isn't triggered yet on a normal kernel, because it still does a VT switch, but it seemed like a good idea to fix this now. Tested-by: Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky at gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Maarten Maathuis <madman2003 at gmail.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_crtc.h | 2 ++ drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drv.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at ubuntu.com> --- diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fbcon.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fbcon.c index 3ed12a8cfc91..a4a586807903 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fbcon.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fbcon.c @@ -370,6 +370,7 @@ nouveau_fbcon_create(struct drm_fb_helper *helper, ret = -ENOMEM; goto

Hi, Here is my patch queue I accumulated over quite a long time. Patches 1-6 are bugfixes, and rest is mostly RFC. Comments are welcome. Best regards, Maxim Levitsky

Hello, while I debugged an issue in the imx-lcdc driver I was constantly irritated about struct drm_device pointer variables being named "dev" because with that name I usually expect a struct device pointer. I think there is a big benefit when these are all renamed to "drm_dev". I have no strong preference here though, so "drmdev" or "drm" are fine for me,

Hello, while I debugged an issue in the imx-lcdc driver I was constantly irritated about struct drm_device pointer variables being named "dev" because with that name I usually expect a struct device pointer. I think there is a big benefit when these are all renamed to "drm_dev". I have no strong preference here though, so "drmdev" or "drm" are fine for me,