search for: currenttop

...an instruction, it does something like this: // Move the instruction to its new location in the instruction stream. MachineInstr *MI = SU->getInstr(); if (IsTopNode) { assert(SU->isTopReady() && "node still has unscheduled dependencies"); if (&*CurrentTop == MI) <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< Here we make sure that CurrentTop != MI. CurrentTop = nextIfDebug(++CurrentTop, CurrentBottom); else { moveInstruction(MI, CurrentTop); TopRPTracker.setPos(MI); } ......

...hing like this: > > // Move the instruction to its new location in the instruction stream. > MachineInstr *MI = SU->getInstr(); > > if (IsTopNode) { > assert(SU->isTopReady() && "node still has unscheduled dependencies"); > if (&*CurrentTop == MI) <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< Here we make > sure that CurrentTop != MI. > CurrentTop = nextIfDebug(++CurrentTop, CurrentBottom); > else { > moveInstruction(MI, CurrentTop); > TopRPTracker.setP...

...> = LDriw <fi#-2>, 0; mem:LD4[FixedStack-2] IntRegs:%vreg31 24B %vreg26<def> = COPY %R0<kill>; IntRegs:%vreg26 28B %vreg106<def> = TFRI 16777216; IntRegs:%vreg106<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< CurrentTop 32B %vreg29<def> = COPY %D2<kill>; DoubleRegs:%vreg29 48B %vreg28<def> = COPY %D1<kill>; DoubleRegs:%vreg28 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< Needs to mov...

...edStack-2] > IntRegs:%vreg31 > 24B %vreg26<def> = COPY %R0<kill>; IntRegs:%vreg26 > 28B %vreg106<def> = TFRI 16777216; > IntRegs:%vreg106<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< CurrentTop > 32B %vreg29<def> = COPY %D2<kill>; DoubleRegs:%vreg29 > 48B %vreg28<def> = COPY %D1<kill>; DoubleRegs:%vreg28 > <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<...

...>, 0; mem:LD4[FixedStack-2] IntRegs:%vreg31 24B %vreg26<def> = COPY %R0<kill>; IntRegs:%vreg26 28B %vreg106<def> = TFRI 16777216; IntRegs:%vreg106<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< CurrentTop 32B %vreg29<def> = COPY %D2<kill>; DoubleRegs:%vreg29 48B %vreg28<def> = COPY %D1<kill>; DoubleRegs:%vreg28 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<&lt...

...-2>, 0; mem:LD4[FixedStack-2] > IntRegs:%vreg31 > 24B %vreg26<def> = COPY %R0<kill>; IntRegs:%vreg26 > 28B %vreg106<def> = TFRI 16777216; > IntRegs:%vreg106<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< CurrentTop > 32B %vreg29<def> = COPY %D2<kill>; DoubleRegs:%vreg29 > 48B %vreg28<def> = COPY %D1<kill>; DoubleRegs:%vreg28 > <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<&l...

...>, 0; mem:LD4[FixedStack-2] IntRegs:%vreg31 24B %vreg26<def> = COPY %R0<kill>; IntRegs:%vreg26 28B %vreg106<def> = TFRI 16777216; IntRegs:%vreg106<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< CurrentTop 32B %vreg29<def> = COPY %D2<kill>; DoubleRegs:%vreg29 48B %vreg28<def> = COPY %D1<kill>; DoubleRegs:%vreg28 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<&lt...

...gt;> IntRegs:%vreg31 >> 24B %vreg26<def> = COPY %R0<kill>; IntRegs:%vreg26 >> 28B %vreg106<def> = TFRI 16777216; >> IntRegs:%vreg106<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< CurrentTop >> 32B %vreg29<def> = COPY %D2<kill>; DoubleRegs:%vreg29 >> 48B %vreg28<def> = COPY %D1<kill>; DoubleRegs:%vreg28 >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<...

Andy, Jacob, I have ported Hexagon MI scheduler to use the new scheduler infrastructure, but one of my tests triggers an assert in LiveInterval update. On the surface it does not make much sense to me, so I wonder if this is something you readily recognize, before I try to prop it open... The assert is: lib/CodeGen/LiveInterval.cpp:266: llvm::LiveRange*

...:%vreg31 > >> 24B %vreg26<def> = COPY %R0<kill>; IntRegs:%vreg26 > >> 28B %vreg106<def> = TFRI 16777216; > >> IntRegs:%vreg106<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< CurrentTop > >> 32B %vreg29<def> = COPY %D2<kill>; DoubleRegs:%vreg29 > >> 48B %vreg28<def> = COPY %D1<kill>; DoubleRegs:%vreg28 > >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<&...

...edStack-2] > IntRegs:%vreg31 > 24B %vreg26<def> = COPY %R0<kill>; IntRegs:%vreg26 > 28B %vreg106<def> = TFRI 16777216; > IntRegs:%vreg106<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< CurrentTop > 32B %vreg29<def> = COPY %D2<kill>; DoubleRegs:%vreg29 > 48B %vreg28<def> = COPY %D1<kill>; DoubleRegs:%vreg28 > <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<...

On Aug 13, 2012, at 8:34 AM, Sergei Larin <slarin at codeaurora.org> wrote: > Andy, > > Yes, this is what Arnold has suggested also, and from this point it looks > like it should work, but it will require parsing the bundle every time we > care to know whether this is a real use or a conditional def. This might > become awkward... but I guess I should provide a better

...not. I'm trying to solve this problem in small steps, so if asked I can certainly provide more information. The first error that I see during compilation is lib/CodeGen/MachineScheduler.cpp:1165: void llvm::ScheduleDAGMILive::scheduleMI(llvm::SUnit*, bool): Assertion `TopRPTracker.getPos() == CurrentTop && "out of sync"' failed. Another important detail is that we are running clang-3.5. I know it is old, but for now we are not allowed to switch to a newer version. I would greatly appreciate any help on this. What is causing this assertion? Is there a way to fix it? Could th...

Hi - my first post here so first of all can I say how impressed I am with this library Now to my first question - I''m simply trying to make a div draggable, here''s my test page: http://localhost:85/folio11.co.uk/js_tech_demo/scriptalicious_test.html what seems to be happening is that the first drag works fine, but on subsequent drags the div''s initial coordinates

.../27/2016 12:10 PM, Rail Shafigulin via llvm-dev wrote: > >> >> The first error that I see during compilation is >> >> lib/CodeGen/MachineScheduler.cpp:1165: void >> llvm::ScheduleDAGMILive::scheduleMI(llvm::SUnit*, bool): Assertion >> `TopRPTracker.getPos() == CurrentTop && "out of sync"' failed. >> > > This happens on Hexagon too. I have a patch for review: > http://reviews.llvm.org/D19438 > > -Krzysztof > > > -- > Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted > by The Linux Fou...

...ia llvm-dev wrote: >> >> >> The first error that I see during compilation is >> >> lib/CodeGen/MachineScheduler.cpp:1165: void >> llvm::ScheduleDAGMILive::scheduleMI(llvm::SUnit*, bool): Assertion >> `TopRPTracker.getPos() == CurrentTop && "out of sync"' failed. >> >> >> This happens on Hexagon too. I have a patch for review: >> http://reviews.llvm.org/D19438 >> >> -Krzysztof >> >> >> -- >> Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a m...

Is it possible to call the super class''s version of a function from a subclass? SuperClass = Class.create(); SuperClass.prototype = { initialize: function(){ this.varA = ''''; this.varB = ''''; } } SubClass = Class.create(); SubClass.prototype = (new SuperClass()).extend({ initialize: function(somevar) { this.somevar = somevar; }

...The first error that I see during compilation is > > lib/CodeGen/MachineScheduler.cpp:1165: void > llvm::ScheduleDAGMILive::scheduleMI(llvm::SUnit*, > bool): Assertion > `TopRPTracker.getPos() == CurrentTop && "out of > sync"' failed. > > > This happens on Hexagon too. I have a patch for review: > http://reviews.llvm.org/D19438 > > -Krzysztof > > > -- > Qu...

Hi list, how can I set the top and left CSS properties for draggable divs? When I modify the properties directly, the DIV jumps to its old position when I start to drag it. Thanks in advance! Martin _________________________________________________________________________ Mit der Gruppen-SMS von WEB.DE FreeMail k?nnen Sie eine SMS an alle Freunde gleichzeitig schicken:

...n catch + for (SmallVectorImpl<Instruction*>::iterator I = StackRestorePoints.begin(), + E = StackRestorePoints.end(); I != E; ++I) { + ++NumUnsafeStackRestorePoints; + + IRB.SetInsertPoint(cast<Instruction>((*I)->getNextNode())); + Value *CurrentTop = DynamicTop ? IRB.CreateLoad(DynamicTop) : StaticTop; + IRB.CreateStore(CurrentTop, UnsafeStackPtr); + } + + return true; +} + +} // end anonymous namespace + +char SafeStack::ID = 0; +INITIALIZE_PASS(SafeStack, "safe-stack", + "Safe Stack instrumentation pass&qu...