search for: current_function_decl

Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "current_function_decl".

2006 Sep 01
3
[LLVMdev] gfortran: patch, question
...ecl.c (revision 160) +++ gcc/fortran/trans-decl.c (working copy) @@ -1334,7 +1334,11 @@ } /* Create RTL for function definition. */ +#ifndef ENABLE_LLVM make_decl_rtl (fndecl); +#else + make_decl_llvm (fndecl); +#endif init_function_start (fndecl); @@ -2472,8 +2476,11 @@ current_function_decl = fndecl; rest_of_decl_compilation (fndecl, 1, 0); - +#ifndef ENABLE_LLVM make_decl_rtl (fndecl); +#else + make_decl_llvm (fndecl); +#endif init_function_start (fndecl); Thanks, -mike -- Michael McCracken UCSD CSE PhD Candidate research: http://www.cse.ucsd.edu/~mmccrack/ misc: http...
2006 Sep 01
0
[LLVMdev] gfortran: patch, question
On Fri, 1 Sep 2006, Michael McCracken wrote: > Hi, I have a first quick patch and a question. The patch links f951 > with g++ when LLVM is enabled. It's at the end of this email. Thanks, applied! > I wanted to know if I should submit patches with comments around them > like the "APPLE LOCAL LLVM" ones that mark the LLVM-only changes to > the tree. I'd like to
2006 Sep 01
2
[LLVMdev] gfortran: patch, question
Hi, I have a first quick patch and a question. The patch links f951 with g++ when LLVM is enabled. It's at the end of this email. I wanted to know if I should submit patches with comments around them like the "APPLE LOCAL LLVM" ones that mark the LLVM-only changes to the tree. I'd like to make it as easy as possible to apply these, so let me know any rules I should be following.