Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "curioisty".
Did you mean:
cruiosity
2010 Jan 22
2
[LLVMdev] how to compile asm output for x86 with Micorsoft's ML
It would be nice to be able to use clang/llvm without GNU toolchain
dependencies. Just out of curioisty what does the
--x86-asm-syntax=intel actually mean then? Does this not get used? Is
this a different syntax than the AT&T variety (forgive me if this is
an obvious question)?
I tried downloading FASM last night and it seemed handle some of the
output, the one thing it didn't like was the s...
2010 Jan 21
0
[LLVMdev] how to compile asm output for x86 with Micorsoft's ML
On Jan 21, 2010, at 2:01 PM, Jim Crafton wrote:
>> Nope, llvm's .s output is only compatible with GAS and other at&t
>> syntax
>> assemblers. It turns out that MASM syntax is highly ambiguous and
>> MASM is
>> not production quality for use by a compiler. This is why visual
>> studio
>> doesn't go through it. Long term, we'd like
2010 Jan 21
4
[LLVMdev] how to compile asm output for x86 with Micorsoft's ML
> Nope, llvm's .s output is only compatible with GAS and other at&t syntax
> assemblers. It turns out that MASM syntax is highly ambiguous and MASM is
> not production quality for use by a compiler. This is why visual studio
> doesn't go through it. Long term, we'd like LLVM to be able to write out .o
> files directly, if you're interested in adding PECOFF