Displaying 20 results from an estimated 20 matches for "cur_slots".
2018 Dec 14
1
[WIP PATCH 05/15] drm/dp_mst: Fix payload deallocation on hotplugs using malloc refs
...- drm_dp_mst_topology_put_port(port);
> return ret;
> }
>
> @@ -2137,15 +2130,16 @@ static int drm_dp_destroy_payload_step2(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr,
> */
> int drm_dp_update_payload_part1(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr)
> {
> - int i, j;
> - int cur_slots = 1;
> struct drm_dp_payload req_payload;
> struct drm_dp_mst_port *port;
> + int i, j;
> + int cur_slots = 1;
>
> mutex_lock(&mgr->payload_lock);
> for (i = 0; i < mgr->max_payloads; i++) {
> struct drm_dp_vcpi *vcpi = mgr->proposed_vcpis[i];
&g...
2018 Dec 14
0
[WIP PATCH 05/15] drm/dp_mst: Fix payload deallocation on hotplugs using malloc refs
...il_put:
drm_dp_mst_topology_put_mstb(mstb);
- drm_dp_mst_topology_put_port(port);
return ret;
}
@@ -2137,15 +2130,16 @@ static int drm_dp_destroy_payload_step2(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr,
*/
int drm_dp_update_payload_part1(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr)
{
- int i, j;
- int cur_slots = 1;
struct drm_dp_payload req_payload;
struct drm_dp_mst_port *port;
+ int i, j;
+ int cur_slots = 1;
mutex_lock(&mgr->payload_lock);
for (i = 0; i < mgr->max_payloads; i++) {
struct drm_dp_vcpi *vcpi = mgr->proposed_vcpis[i];
struct drm_dp_payload *payload = &m...
2018 Dec 20
0
[PATCH v2 05/16] drm/dp_mst: Fix payload deallocation on hotplugs using malloc refs
...il_put:
drm_dp_mst_topology_put_mstb(mstb);
- drm_dp_mst_topology_put_port(port);
return ret;
}
@@ -2256,15 +2249,16 @@ static int drm_dp_destroy_payload_step2(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr,
*/
int drm_dp_update_payload_part1(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr)
{
- int i, j;
- int cur_slots = 1;
struct drm_dp_payload req_payload;
struct drm_dp_mst_port *port;
+ int i, j;
+ int cur_slots = 1;
mutex_lock(&mgr->payload_lock);
for (i = 0; i < mgr->max_payloads; i++) {
struct drm_dp_vcpi *vcpi = mgr->proposed_vcpis[i];
struct drm_dp_payload *payload = &m...
2018 Dec 14
1
[WIP PATCH 02/15] drm/dp_mst: Refactor drm_dp_update_payload_part1()
...lt; mgr->max_payloads; i++) {
> + struct drm_dp_vcpi *vcpi = mgr->proposed_vcpis[i];
> + struct drm_dp_payload *payload = &mgr->payloads[i];
> +
> /* solve the current payloads - compare to the hw ones
> - update the hw view */
> req_payload.start_slot = cur_slots;
> - if (mgr->proposed_vcpis[i]) {
> - port = container_of(mgr->proposed_vcpis[i], struct drm_dp_mst_port, vcpi);
> + if (vcpi) {
> + port = container_of(vcpi, struct drm_dp_mst_port,
> + vcpi);
> port = drm_dp_get_validated_port_ref(mgr, port);
> if...
2018 Dec 14
0
[WIP PATCH 02/15] drm/dp_mst: Refactor drm_dp_update_payload_part1()
...yload_lock);
for (i = 0; i < mgr->max_payloads; i++) {
+ struct drm_dp_vcpi *vcpi = mgr->proposed_vcpis[i];
+ struct drm_dp_payload *payload = &mgr->payloads[i];
+
/* solve the current payloads - compare to the hw ones
- update the hw view */
req_payload.start_slot = cur_slots;
- if (mgr->proposed_vcpis[i]) {
- port = container_of(mgr->proposed_vcpis[i], struct drm_dp_mst_port, vcpi);
+ if (vcpi) {
+ port = container_of(vcpi, struct drm_dp_mst_port,
+ vcpi);
port = drm_dp_get_validated_port_ref(mgr, port);
if (!port) {
mutex_unlock(&m...
2018 Dec 14
22
[WIP PATCH 00/15] MST refcounting/atomic helpers cleanup
This is a WIP version of the series I've been working on for a while now
to get all of the atomic DRM drivers in the tree to use the atomic MST
helpers, and to make the atomic MST helpers actually idempotent. Turns
out it's a lot more difficult to do that without also fixing how port
and branch device refcounting works so that it actually makes sense,
since the current upstream
2018 Dec 20
22
[PATCH v2 00/16] MST refcounting/atomic helpers cleanup
This is the series I've been working on for a while now to get all of
the atomic DRM drivers in the tree to use the atomic MST helpers, and to
make the atomic MST helpers actually idempotent. Turns out it's a lot
more difficult to do that without also fixing how port and branch device
refcounting works so that it actually makes sense, since the current
upstream implementation requires a
2018 Dec 20
0
[PATCH v2 01/16] drm/dp_mst: Rename drm_dp_mst_get_validated_(port|mstb)_ref and friends
...= drm_dp_get_validated_port_ref(mgr, port);
+ port = drm_dp_mst_topology_get_port_validated(mgr,
+ port);
if (!port) {
mutex_unlock(&mgr->payload_lock);
return -EINVAL;
@@ -1925,7 +1935,7 @@ int drm_dp_update_payload_part1(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr)
cur_slots += req_payload.num_slots;
if (port)
- drm_dp_put_port(port);
+ drm_dp_mst_topology_put_port(port);
}
for (i = 0; i < mgr->max_payloads; i++) {
@@ -2024,7 +2034,7 @@ static int drm_dp_send_dpcd_write(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr,
struct drm_dp_sideband_msg_tx *txmsg;...
2011 Jun 02
0
[PATCH] pci: Use pr_<level> and pr_fmt
Use the current logging message styles.
Convert the dbg and debug macros to alway have a terminating \n.
Remove err, warn, and info macros, use pr_<level>.
Add pr_fmt as appropriate.
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe at perches.com>
---
drivers/pci/dmar.c | 116 ++++-----
drivers/pci/hotplug/acpi_pcihp.c | 36 ++--
drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp.h
2011 Jun 02
0
[PATCH] pci: Use pr_<level> and pr_fmt
Use the current logging message styles.
Convert the dbg and debug macros to alway have a terminating \n.
Remove err, warn, and info macros, use pr_<level>.
Add pr_fmt as appropriate.
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe at perches.com>
---
drivers/pci/dmar.c | 116 ++++-----
drivers/pci/hotplug/acpi_pcihp.c | 36 ++--
drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp.h
2011 Jun 02
0
[PATCH] pci: Use pr_<level> and pr_fmt
Use the current logging message styles.
Convert the dbg and debug macros to alway have a terminating \n.
Remove err, warn, and info macros, use pr_<level>.
Add pr_fmt as appropriate.
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe at perches.com>
---
drivers/pci/dmar.c | 116 ++++-----
drivers/pci/hotplug/acpi_pcihp.c | 36 ++--
drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp.h
2019 Jan 03
16
[PATCH v3 00/16] MST refcounting/atomic helpers cleanup
This is the series I've been working on for a while now to get all of
the atomic DRM drivers in the tree to use the atomic MST helpers, and to
make the atomic MST helpers actually idempotent. Turns out it's a lot
more difficult to do that without also fixing how port and branch device
refcounting works so that it actually makes sense, since the current
upstream implementation requires a
2019 Jan 11
20
[PATCH v7 00/20] MST refcounting/atomic helpers cleanup
This is the series I've been working on for a while now to get all of
the atomic DRM drivers in the tree to use the atomic MST helpers, and to
make the atomic MST helpers actually idempotent. Turns out it's a lot
more difficult to do that without also fixing how port and branch device
refcounting works so that it actually makes sense, since the current
upstream implementation requires a
2019 Jan 10
21
[PATCH v6 00/20] MST refcounting/atomic helpers cleanup
This is the series I've been working on for a while now to get all of
the atomic DRM drivers in the tree to use the atomic MST helpers, and to
make the atomic MST helpers actually idempotent. Turns out it's a lot
more difficult to do that without also fixing how port and branch device
refcounting works so that it actually makes sense, since the current
upstream implementation requires a
2019 Jan 05
19
[PATCH v4 00/16] MST refcounting/atomic helpers cleanup
This is the series I've been working on for a while now to get all of
the atomic DRM drivers in the tree to use the atomic MST helpers, and to
make the atomic MST helpers actually idempotent. Turns out it's a lot
more difficult to do that without also fixing how port and branch device
refcounting works so that it actually makes sense, since the current
upstream implementation requires a
2019 Jan 09
27
[PATCH v5 00/20] MST refcounting/atomic helpers cleanup
This is the series I've been working on for a while now to get all of
the atomic DRM drivers in the tree to use the atomic MST helpers, and to
make the atomic MST helpers actually idempotent. Turns out it's a lot
more difficult to do that without also fixing how port and branch device
refcounting works so that it actually makes sense, since the current
upstream implementation requires a
2018 Dec 14
0
[WIP PATCH 03/15] drm/dp_mst: Introduce new refcounting scheme for mstbs and ports
...= drm_dp_get_validated_port_ref(mgr, port);
+ port = drm_dp_mst_topology_get_port_validated(mgr,
+ port);
if (!port) {
mutex_unlock(&mgr->payload_lock);
return -EINVAL;
@@ -1925,7 +2193,7 @@ int drm_dp_update_payload_part1(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr)
cur_slots += req_payload.num_slots;
if (port)
- drm_dp_put_port(port);
+ drm_dp_mst_topology_put_port(port);
}
for (i = 0; i < mgr->max_payloads; i++) {
@@ -2024,7 +2292,7 @@ static int drm_dp_send_dpcd_write(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr,
struct drm_dp_sideband_msg_tx *txmsg;...
2018 Dec 14
2
[WIP PATCH 03/15] drm/dp_mst: Introduce new refcounting scheme for mstbs and ports
...r, port);
> + port = drm_dp_mst_topology_get_port_validated(mgr,
> + port);
> if (!port) {
> mutex_unlock(&mgr->payload_lock);
> return -EINVAL;
> @@ -1925,7 +2193,7 @@ int drm_dp_update_payload_part1(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr)
> cur_slots += req_payload.num_slots;
>
> if (port)
> - drm_dp_put_port(port);
> + drm_dp_mst_topology_put_port(port);
> }
>
> for (i = 0; i < mgr->max_payloads; i++) {
> @@ -2024,7 +2292,7 @@ static int drm_dp_send_dpcd_write(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr,
&g...
2018 Dec 19
1
[WIP PATCH 03/15] drm/dp_mst: Introduce new refcounting scheme for mstbs and ports
...> > + port);
> > > if (!port) {
> > > mutex_unlock(&mgr->payload_lock);
> > > return -EINVAL;
> > > @@ -1925,7 +2193,7 @@ int drm_dp_update_payload_part1(struct
> > > drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr)
> > > cur_slots += req_payload.num_slots;
> > >
> > > if (port)
> > > - drm_dp_put_port(port);
> > > + drm_dp_mst_topology_put_port(port);
> > > }
> > >
> > > for (i = 0; i < mgr->max_payloads; i++) {
> > > @@ -2024,7 +229...
2018 Dec 18
0
[WIP PATCH 03/15] drm/dp_mst: Introduce new refcounting scheme for mstbs and ports
...ology_get_port_validated(mgr,
> > + port);
> > if (!port) {
> > mutex_unlock(&mgr->payload_lock);
> > return -EINVAL;
> > @@ -1925,7 +2193,7 @@ int drm_dp_update_payload_part1(struct
> > drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr)
> > cur_slots += req_payload.num_slots;
> >
> > if (port)
> > - drm_dp_put_port(port);
> > + drm_dp_mst_topology_put_port(port);
> > }
> >
> > for (i = 0; i < mgr->max_payloads; i++) {
> > @@ -2024,7 +2292,7 @@ static int drm_dp_send_dpcd_write...