search for: cunhas

Wiki I am referring to was the link I spent to update the samba, I use the method described it to upgrade my Samba 4.3.0 -> 4.3.2? https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Updating_Samba Em 09-12-2015 14:07, Reindl Harald escreveu: > > > Am 09.12.2015 um 17:00 schrieb Carlos A. P. Cunha: >> Understood, then I follow what's in the Wiki? > > Wiki? > how did you install

In short, I follow what ja think I was telling to UPGRADE follow the Wiki(which is was the same as you gave me) My samba has been updated from version 4.2 to 4.3(used wiki), so said he was running since August. Thank you very much for your attention. Bye Em 09-12-2015 15:01, Reindl Harald escreveu: > > > Am 09.12.2015 um 17:41 schrieb Carlos A. P. Cunha: >> Ok, my installation

Understood, then I follow what's in the Wiki? Thanks Em 09-12-2015 13:47, Reindl Harald escreveu: > > Am 09.12.2015 um 16:41 schrieb Carlos A. P. Cunha: >> hehehe >> Thank you for your attention. >> Know if you have a more "easy" to update the 4.3.0 -> 4.3.2 not be >> presented here. >> >> https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Updating_Samba

On Sat, 8 Oct 2016 17:50:07 -0300 Rodrigo Cunha via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > [root at samba etc]# cat smb.conf > # Global parameters > [global] > netbios name = SAMBA > realm = ODUVALDOCOZZI.INTRANET > workgroup = ODUVALDOCOZZI > dns forwarder = 8.8.8.8 > server role = active directory domain controller >

Ok, my installation was build following the official wiki Samba using OS like Ubuntu 14:04. Still the question remains how do I update the package? Following the wiki (I spent in another email) or otherwise? Thanks Em 09-12-2015 14:33, Reindl Harald escreveu: > > > Am 09.12.2015 um 17:20 schrieb Carlos A. P. Cunha: >> Wiki I am referring to was the link I spent to update the

Hello! Bind this as Wiki Samba, this only occurred attempting to add the Windows server when I adicioneo i second samba the problem did not occur. Em 23-06-2016 16:30, Rowland penny escreveu: > On 22/06/16 04:45, Carlos A. P. Cunha wrote: >> Hello! >> Own two DC Samba 4 version 4.3.3, I'm trying to add a Windows Server >> 2008 SP1, however it is in replication screen

. Dear, My samba is not working, I can not access the DNS other hosts on the network , only localhost. I think it's a problem in your configuration. The following is the configuration file. -- Atenciosamente, Rodrigo da Silva Cunha

Hello! It may be, what I did yesterday was to adjust the /etc/nsswitch.conf of my DCs, and again ran the sysvolreset takes more than 10 minutes it changed several files (permissions) within the Sysvol, but Finau gave error (the same) . The some form of correction? Thank you. Em 15-06-2016 12:17, lingpanda101 at gmail.com escreveu: > On 6/14/2016 8:32 PM, Carlos A. P. Cunha wrote: >>

hehehe Thank you for your attention. Know if you have a more "easy" to update the 4.3.0 -> 4.3.2 not be presented here. https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Updating_Samba Application patch, exemple.... Bye!! Em 09-12-2015 12:11, L.P.H. van Belle escreveu: > Sorry none.. > > I suggest first upgrade to the latest 4.3.x > If it is still there, post again, but with some

On 14/07/16 13:32, Carlos A. P. Cunha wrote: > > Hello! > Any opinion on that? > Thank you > > > Em 13-07-2016 10:52, Carlos A. P. Cunha escreveu: >> >> Thank you for the explanation. >> Yes, it was a mistake to leave my two faxias that way, by the ID >> exchange reason the low range will leave as it was to have no problems >> idmap config

Dear, The problem is resolvido.Removi the standard rules of CENTOS and dns is responding. I do not need these, I have a firewall. Below is a table with the filter and reject rules CENTOS: [root at samba ~]# iptables -nvL Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT 0 packets, 0 bytes) pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination 2527 775K ACCEPT all -- * * 0.0.0.0/0

Am 08.10.2016 um 23:30 schrieb Rodrigo Cunha via samba: > Thanks for the answer, I need the samba as internal DNS, but it does not > respond to requests from other machines on the network define "it does not respond" * /usr/bin/netstat --numeric-hosts --numeric-ports --programs -u -t -l * check four firewall

Am 23.01.2017 um 12:59 schrieb Carlos A. P. Cunha via samba: > Em 20-01-2017 18:19, Carlos A. P. Cunha escreveu: >> >> Hello >> I have about 10 Dcs Samba 4.4.4 running on Debian 8, in distinct >> networks, one of them presents the error: >> >> Result 121 (WERR_SEM_TIMEOUT) >> >> When I execute the command to check the DRS. >> >> Any

On Fri, 16 Jun 2017 10:32:08 -0300 "Carlos A. P. Cunha via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hello! > > Any idea ? > > Regards > You can ignore the 'Not removing dangling forward link' errors, they do not affect AD. Rowland

Hello! Any idea? Em 11-06-2016 16:13, Carlos A. P. Cunha escreveu: > > Hello! > > Any idea? > > > Em 10-06-2016 14:29, Carlos A. P. Cunha escreveu: >> Hello! >> >> I have two Dcs Samba 4 version 4.4.0, the DC 2 received rsync to DC >> 1, ok this SYSVOL, but necessary execute "samba-tool ntacl sysvol >> reset", for correct ids, but

Hello!! ls -l /opt/samba/var/locks/sysvol/mydominio.local total 16 drwxrwx---+ 26 root 3000000 4096 Jan 5 19:48 Policies drwxrwx---+ 2 root 3000000 4096 Jul 31 2015 scripts ls -l Policies/ total 192 drwxrwx---+ 5 root 3000000 4096 Set 16 2015 {0B61360F-3848-4672-B9AF-F7C80AA1B296} drwxrwx---+ 5 root 3000000 4096 Set 16 2015 {0C635CCE-DC1D-4056-A38C-8F9020480E73} drwxrwx---+ 5 root 3000000

Am 09.12.2015 um 17:20 schrieb Carlos A. P. Cunha: > Wiki I am referring to was the link I spent to update the samba, I use > the method described it to upgrade my Samba 4.3.0 -> 4.3.2? > > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Updating_Samba damned - how did you install it? [ ] self compiled [ ] package [ ] package on what operating system THERE IS NOTHING to do besides update the

On 6/17/2016 11:10 AM, Carlos A. P. Cunha wrote: > Hello! > > > something else I can try? > > > Thanks > > > Em 15-06-2016 12:41, Carlos A. P. Cunha escreveu: >> >> Hello! >> It may be, what I did yesterday was to adjust the /etc/nsswitch.conf >> of my DCs, and again ran the sysvolreset takes more than 10 minutes >> it changed several

Hy, sorry for my poor english i think i''m having a very unusual problem and very dificult to track, but i''ll try to explain it as best as i can. here is my scenario: a firewall/bridge composed of 3 ethernet devices and 1 virtual one. my bridge (br0 ) is composed of eth0, eth1 and tap0 br0:eth0 is my connection to my router (200.244.92.1) br0:eth1 is my connection to my

Thank you for the explanation. Yes, it was a mistake to leave my two faxias that way, by the ID exchange reason the low range will leave as it was to have no problems idmap config SERVERAD: range = 5000-33554431 The range of up'm thinking of changing to something idmap config *: range = 2000-4500 Not to be superimposed. But it will it not cause problem ids trading again? Since it was