search for: cubranic

In a conversation with a programmer new to writing R packages, he mentioned that he was very confused by phrase "package writer" used in the document, and said that he "[was] literally imagining some sort of function that writes something related to packages". I can see his point: not only is it confusing, but I think it's also bad English (one wouldn't say "the

...ort used to do for 3.0.2. Also, there is an issue tracking updating the port to the current release: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195783. I've posted the summary of this thread there, thanks for your help. Davor Prof Brian Ripley writes: > On 31/08/2015 16:26, Davor Cubranic wrote: >> Prof Brian Ripley writes: >> >>> Second, we don't have all the pertinent information such as the >>> configure options used and the architecture (x86_64?). I am going to >>> have to guess none as none were mentioned, but using --enable-R-shlib &...

If in my package "Foo" I call a function from another package "Bar" if it's available, according to R-exts, this sounds like I should include "Suggests: Bar" in package Foo's description. But the manual is silent on how to treat Bar's namespace. Should I import it? If so, should this be conditional or unconditional? There is a thread from 2008 in which

...ey writes: > Second, we don't have all the pertinent information such as the > configure options used and the architecture (x86_64?). I am going to > have to guess none as none were mentioned, but using --enable-R-shlib > would be pertinent. > > On 31/08/2015 05:47, Davor Cubranic wrote: >> On FreeBSD 10.2, I get the following error when compiling R from the >> Subversion trunk (with "configure && make"): > > You have not told us which revision. A basic check is to see if you can > build the latest released version, as the trunk is ...

...n.r-project.org/doc/manuals/r-patched/R-admin.html#OS-X): 'Configure option --with-internal-tzcode is the default on OS X, as the system implementation of time zones does not work correctly for times before 1902 or after 2037 (despite using a 64-bit time_t).' On 01/09/2015 15:40, Davor Cubranic wrote: > I tried compiling using GCC. First, I changed config.site to: > ~/R-3.2.2$ svn diff config.site > Index: config.site > =================================================================== > --- config.site (revision 69236) > +++ config.site (working copy) > @@ -278,3 +2...

On 31/08/2015 16:26, Davor Cubranic wrote: > Prof Brian Ripley writes: > >> Second, we don't have all the pertinent information such as the >> configure options used and the architecture (x86_64?). I am going to >> have to guess none as none were mentioned, but using --enable-R-shlib >> would be per...

On FreeBSD 10.2, I get the following error when compiling R from the Subversion trunk (with "configure && make"): cc -shared -L/usr/local/lib -o tools.so text.o init.o Rmd5.o md5.o signals.o install.o getfmts.o http.o gramLatex.o gramRd.o mkdir ../../../../library/tools/libs installing 'sysdata.rda' Error in dyn.load(file, DLLpath = DLLpath, ...) :

It appears that Mingw gcc included in RTools is missing a dependent library. If I compile a program with '-lgomp' switch (for OpenMP support), I get a errors about undefined references to functions like '_imp__pthread_mutex_destroy'. Adding the '-static' switch, I get the following error: c:/rtools/mingw/bin/../lib/gcc/mingw32/4.5.0/../../../../mingw32/bin/ld.exe:

...ecifically about loading dynamic libs. Second, we don't have all the pertinent information such as the configure options used and the architecture (x86_64?). I am going to have to guess none as none were mentioned, but using --enable-R-shlib would be pertinent. On 31/08/2015 05:47, Davor Cubranic wrote: > On FreeBSD 10.2, I get the following error when compiling R from the > Subversion trunk (with "configure && make"): You have not told us which revision. A basic check is to see if you can build the latest released version, as the trunk is 'Under development...

...jsamperi@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 1:20 PM, Romain >>>> Francois<romain@r-enthusiasts.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Le 11/01/11 19:12, Davor Cubranic a écrit : >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I think an important point from Doug has been lost in the subsequent >>>>>> 20-odd messages of flamebombing: >>>>>> >>>>>> I do not see this as compatible with the...