search for: cuasing

I have been getting this error message on various pages, just wondering if anyone could explain whats going wrong, and the best way to correct it code that is cuasing the problem is below @project = Project.find(:first, :conditions => "id = " + @purchaseorder.project_id) -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

I can ping from A to B, but i can`t form B to A, even when i changed the DNS of A. if anyone can help me, `cuase i saw there was the samw problem in another linux user. ----------------------------------------------------------- Sign up and get your 30GB webmail at www.30gigs.com now! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 02:22:32PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 04:19:08PM -0600, alan somers wrote: > > The existing Rust bindings for nbdkit aren't very idiomatic Rust, and they > > are missing a lot of features. So I've rewritten them. The new bindings > > aren't backwards compatible, but I doubt that's a problem. Most

On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 08:11:47AM -0600, alan somers wrote: > On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 8:04 AM Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> > wrote: > > > On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 02:22:32PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 04:19:08PM -0600, alan somers wrote: > > > > The existing Rust bindings for nbdkit aren't very idiomatic

Hello, I just upgraded from Samba 2.2.7 to Samba 3.0.0 on RedHat 9. I did this by uninstalling the 2.2.7 samba RPM's and then applying the Samba 3.0.0 RPM from samba.org, then putting my local changes back into smb.conf. I have also migrated my smb users from smbpasswd to tdbsam with the pdbedit utility as discussed in the HOWTO. It seems I have to rejoin my client boxes (windows 2000 pro)

Hello, We're suffering from sporadic network blockage(read: unable to ping other nodes) with 1.1-pre17. Before upgrading to the 1.1-pre release, the same network blockage also manifested itself in a pure 1.0.33 network. The log shows that there are a lot of "Got ADD_EDGE from nodeX (192.168.0.1 port 655) which does not match existing entry" and it turns out that the mismatches

Sorry if this question has been asked before I looked through some of the archives before posting this. I am considering using dovecot on a small 35 user environment (only around 6 gigs of email) that will be primarly be used with squirrelmail for the MUA. I have been using dovecot for a few weeks now and really like it. It is a big improvement over uw-imap thats for sure. I was wondering how

That's what I'm going to do, after purging all the current nvidia stuff frommy system. The second thing I'm going to do is download, build and install the latest decent version of Wine. Thanks for all your advice. It's been really helpful. --------- One more question. What with OpenGL support getting dropped from WoW, I was wondering if it was worth trying to use DirectX under

On 24/02/02 05:02, Jack Moffitt shaped the electrons to say: > > - The server didn't check for the status of the client's socket before > > the unblocking send(). This caused a disconnection at a minimun network > > congestion, causing a broken pipe error (Linux 2.4 behaviour?) in the > > network. I've just added a poll in sock.c.> > Can you send me this

On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 8:04 AM Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 02:22:32PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 04:19:08PM -0600, alan somers wrote: > > > The existing Rust bindings for nbdkit aren't very idiomatic Rust, and > they > > > are missing a lot of features. So I've rewritten

> It the first problem I found when I started to use the server and the reason > I began to modify it. The patch is sock.diff I still don't understand the problem, nor have I reproduced it. We shouldn't need to check the status of the socket before we call send(). If there were any send errors, we would have seen them after the last call to send(). Even if we didn't, it

Hi all, We are running more than 40 active calls on our Asterisk Box. But some time we are facing problem, call is not disconnecting for a long time more than 2 and 2 hrs. in this cuase our customers charged for 1,2 hrs. even they made very small calls. i have already set rtptimeout = 60, but not disconnecting Here is my extentions. [main-ext] exten => _x.,1,AGI(main-ext.pl) exten =>

Hi, I try to solve my problem with asterisk and BLF function. I have registered peers from realtime with subscriptions but only type is mwi (shown by 'sip show subscriptions'). Peers are registered from behind the NAT - may it be the cuase why they not subscribed with dialog-info+xml? Regards, Jarek

I found a thread that has almost the exact same symptoms as me, but didn't seem to come to a resolution: https://listman.redhat.com/archives/ext3-users/2004-December/msg00018.html I have an LVM(2) array that I've just lvextend'd and want to resize2fs, but I can't get through the e2fsck. I get these errors when fsck-ing: Group 3125's inode table at 102400545 conflicts with

Hi! I am having some trouble with a samba domain distributed over 2 subnets (192.168.0.0/23 (supernetted) & 192.168.4.0/24). These subnets are linked over the internet through a IPSec gateway to gateway (network to network) connection (i.e. all machines can reach/ping each other on both subnets). The samba PDC (with LDAP backend) has IP 192.168.0.4 and there is a BDC (LDAP slave) in

On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 02:36:18PM +0800, Amit Lianson wrote: > We're suffering from sporadic network blockage(read: unable to ping > other nodes) with 1.1-pre17. Before upgrading to the 1.1-pre release, > the same network blockage also manifested itself in a pure 1.0.33 > network. > > The log shows that there are a lot of "Got ADD_EDGE from nodeX >

Hi Steve, MTA = Postfix I have amavis - spamassassin - dspam installed. i think spamassassin scnas after dspam, cuase in the mail headers dspam comes at first. I use Dovecot as Imap Server OS = Gentoo Linux i put the config of dspam here = http://rafb.net/p/VCX8XO97.html if u need more confs just tell me , i can paste then marko Steve schrieb: > Hallo Marko > > This is not

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24147 Summary: xv output slow and causes wmaker screen corruption Product: xorg Version: git Platform: Other OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Driver/nouveau AssignedTo: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org

On 22/03/02 22:24, Jack Moffitt shaped the electrons to say: > > It the first problem I found when I started to use the server and the > > reason I began to modify it. The patch is sock.diff > > I still don't understand the problem, nor have I reproduced it. > > We shouldn't need to check the status of the socket before we call > send(). If there were any send

Hi all! This is a repost to this list, hoping to draw some extra attention because I got NO reply whatsoever to the original posting :( I would really appreciate if someone could comment om which of both strategies as described below is best. I am having some trouble with a samba domain distributed over 2 subnets (192.168.0.0/23 (supernetted) & 192.168.4.0/24). These subnets are