search for: cuased

I have been getting this error message on various pages, just wondering if anyone could explain whats going wrong, and the best way to correct it code that is cuasing the problem is below @project = Project.find(:first, :conditions => "id = " + @purchaseorder.project_id) -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

I can ping from A to B, but i can`t form B to A, even when i changed the DNS of A. if anyone can help me, `cuase i saw there was the samw problem in another linux user. ----------------------------------------------------------- Sign up and get your 30GB webmail at www.30gigs.com now! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 02:22:32PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 04:19:08PM -0600, alan somers wrote: > > The existing Rust bindings for nbdkit aren't very idiomatic Rust, and they > > are missing a lot of features. So I've rewritten them. The new bindings > > aren't backwards compatible, but I doubt that's a problem. Most

On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 08:11:47AM -0600, alan somers wrote: > On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 8:04 AM Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> > wrote: > > > On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 02:22:32PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 04:19:08PM -0600, alan somers wrote: > > > > The existing Rust bindings for nbdkit aren't very idiomatic

..., I have had to add the following to my smb.conf file to use tdbsam successfully. logon home = \\%L\%U logon path = \\%L\%U\profile I had to do this in order to get the correct string to come up in pdbedit -Lv for the "Home Directory" and "Profile Path" variables (the defaults cuased %N to show in place of the server name) - when I used 'smbpasswd' as the backend pdbedit -Lv showed proper values and things worked OK. I also had to mess around a bit with 'net groupmap' modify/list to get the standard Windows groups to map properly to UNIX groups, as discussed in...

...e17. Before upgrading to the 1.1-pre release, the same network blockage also manifested itself in a pure 1.0.33 network. The log shows that there are a lot of "Got ADD_EDGE from nodeX (192.168.0.1 port 655) which does not match existing entry" and it turns out that the mismatches were cuased by different weight received by add_edge_h(). This network is consists of ~4 hub nodes and 50+ leaf nodes. Sample hub config: Name = hub1 ConnectTo = hub2 ConnectTo = hub3 ConnectTo = hub4 Leaf looks like: Name = node1 ConnectTo = hub1 ConnectTo = hub2 ConnectTo = hub3...

Sorry if this question has been asked before I looked through some of the archives before posting this. I am considering using dovecot on a small 35 user environment (only around 6 gigs of email) that will be primarly be used with squirrelmail for the MUA. I have been using dovecot for a few weeks now and really like it. It is a big improvement over uw-imap thats for sure. I was wondering how

That's what I'm going to do, after purging all the current nvidia stuff frommy system. The second thing I'm going to do is download, build and install the latest decent version of Wine. Thanks for all your advice. It's been really helpful. --------- One more question. What with OpenGL support getting dropped from WoW, I was wondering if it was worth trying to use DirectX under

On 24/02/02 05:02, Jack Moffitt shaped the electrons to say: > > - The server didn't check for the status of the client's socket before > > the unblocking send(). This caused a disconnection at a minimun network > > congestion, causing a broken pipe error (Linux 2.4 behaviour?) in the > > network. I've just added a poll in sock.c.> > Can you send me this

On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 8:04 AM Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 02:22:32PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 04:19:08PM -0600, alan somers wrote: > > > The existing Rust bindings for nbdkit aren't very idiomatic Rust, and > they > > > are missing a lot of features. So I've rewritten

...shouldn't need to check the status of the socket before we call send(). If there were any send errors, we would have seen them after the last call to send(). Even if we didn't, it shouldn't affect future calls (at worst, they will fail again). I think the behavior you were seeing was cuased by the next bug: > > > - Solved a bug in source.c, when checking for recoverable error. It has > > > to be done _only_ when result < 0. I did look over source.c and you were correct. I have fixed this in CVS. I'm not sure why I didn't see this before, or why it didn...

Hi all, We are running more than 40 active calls on our Asterisk Box. But some time we are facing problem, call is not disconnecting for a long time more than 2 and 2 hrs. in this cuase our customers charged for 1,2 hrs. even they made very small calls. i have already set rtptimeout = 60, but not disconnecting Here is my extentions. [main-ext] exten => _x.,1,AGI(main-ext.pl) exten =>

Hi, I try to solve my problem with asterisk and BLF function. I have registered peers from realtime with subscriptions but only type is mwi (shown by 'sip show subscriptions'). Peers are registered from behind the NAT - may it be the cuase why they not subscribed with dialog-info+xml? Regards, Jarek

I found a thread that has almost the exact same symptoms as me, but didn't seem to come to a resolution: https://listman.redhat.com/archives/ext3-users/2004-December/msg00018.html I have an LVM(2) array that I've just lvextend'd and want to resize2fs, but I can't get through the e2fsck. I get these errors when fsck-ing: Group 3125's inode table at 102400545 conflicts with

...= Yes domain master = No wins support = No wins server = 192.168.0.4 All machines in both subnets would get 192.168.0.4 (PDC) as WINS server by the dhcp server. However like stated before this works very slow. Does anyone know if this is actually is a good approach and the slowness is cuased by something else? Anyway I read on a previous posting to this list (and the manual) that it's possible to use remote browse sync to sync the browse lists. So I decided to change the strategy and configure the PDC as below: domain logons = Yes os level = 65 preferred master = Yes...

...1.1-pre release, > the same network blockage also manifested itself in a pure 1.0.33 > network. > > The log shows that there are a lot of "Got ADD_EDGE from nodeX > (192.168.0.1 port 655) which does not match existing entry" and it > turns out that the mismatches were cuased by different weight received > by add_edge_h(). > > This network is consists of ~4 hub nodes and 50+ leaf nodes. Sample > hub config: [...] Could you send me the output of "tincctl -n <netname> dump graph"? That would help me to try to reproduce the problem. Also, i...

Hi Steve, MTA = Postfix I have amavis - spamassassin - dspam installed. i think spamassassin scnas after dspam, cuase in the mail headers dspam comes at first. I use Dovecot as Imap Server OS = Gentoo Linux i put the config of dspam here = http://rafb.net/p/VCX8XO97.html if u need more confs just tell me , i can paste then marko Steve schrieb: > Hallo Marko > > This is not

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24147 Summary: xv output slow and causes wmaker screen corruption Product: xorg Version: git Platform: Other OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Driver/nouveau AssignedTo: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org

...to check the status of the socket before we call > send(). If there were any send errors, we would have seen them after > the last call to send(). Even if we didn't, it shouldn't affect future > calls (at worst, they will fail again). > I think the behavior you were seeing was cuased by the next bug: > > > > - Solved a bug in source.c, when checking for recoverable error. It > > > > has to be done _only_ when result < 0. > > I did look over source.c and you were correct. I have fixed this in > CVS. > > I'm not sure why I didn't...

...= Yes domain master = No wins support = No wins server = 192.168.0.4 All machines in both subnets would get 192.168.0.4 (PDC) as WINS server by the dhcp server. However like stated before this works very slow. Does anyone know if this is actually is a good approach and the slowness is cuased by something else? Anyway I read on a previous posting to this list (and the manual) that it's possible to use remote browse sync to sync the browse lists. So I decided to change the strategy and configure the PDC as below: domain logons = Yes os level = 65 preferred master = Yes...