search for: ctx_has_com

As part of memory barrier cleanup, this patchset extends checkpatch to make it easier to stop incorrect memory barrier usage. This applies on top of my series arch: barrier cleanup + barriers for virt and will be included in the next version of the series. Michael S. Tsirkin (3): checkpatch.pl: add missing memory barriers checkpatch: check for __smp outside barrier.h checkpatch: add virt

As part of memory barrier cleanup, this patchset extends checkpatch to make it easier to stop incorrect memory barrier usage. This applies on top of my series arch: barrier cleanup + barriers for virt and will be included in the next version of the series. Michael S. Tsirkin (3): checkpatch.pl: add missing memory barriers checkpatch: check for __smp outside barrier.h checkpatch: add virt

As part of memory barrier cleanup, this patchset extends checkpatch to make it easier to stop incorrect memory barrier usage. This applies on top of my series arch: barrier cleanup + barriers for virt and will be included in the next version of the series. Changes from v2: catch optional\s* before () in barriers rewrite using qr{} instead of map Michael S. Tsirkin (3): checkpatch.pl: add

As part of memory barrier cleanup, this patchset extends checkpatch to make it easier to stop incorrect memory barrier usage. This applies on top of my series arch: barrier cleanup + barriers for virt and will be included in the next version of the series. Changes from v2: catch optional\s* before () in barriers rewrite using qr{} instead of map Michael S. Tsirkin (3): checkpatch.pl: add

...$barriers| > + smp_($smp_barriers) > + }x; And this shouldn't have a capture group. my $all_barriers = qr{ $barriers| $smp_barriers }x; > + > + if ($line =~ /\b($all_barriers)\s*\(/) { This doesn't need the capture group either (?:all_barriers) > ? if (!ctx_has_comment($first_line, $linenr)) > { > ? WARN("MEMORY_BARRIER", > ? ?????"memory barrier without > comment\n" . $herecurr);

...$barriers| > + smp_($smp_barriers) > + }x; And this shouldn't have a capture group. my $all_barriers = qr{ $barriers| $smp_barriers }x; > + > + if ($line =~ /\b($all_barriers)\s*\(/) { This doesn't need the capture group either (?:all_barriers) > ? if (!ctx_has_comment($first_line, $linenr)) > { > ? WARN("MEMORY_BARRIER", > ? ?????"memory barrier without > comment\n" . $herecurr);

As part of memory barrier cleanup, this patchset extends checkpatch to make it easier to stop incorrect memory barrier usage. This replaces the checkpatch patches in my series arch: barrier cleanup + barriers for virt and will be included in the next version of the series. changes from v2: address comments by Joe Perches: use (?: ... ) to avoid unnecessary capture groups rename smp_barriers

As part of memory barrier cleanup, this patchset extends checkpatch to make it easier to stop incorrect memory barrier usage. This replaces the checkpatch patches in my series arch: barrier cleanup + barriers for virt and will be included in the next version of the series. changes from v2: address comments by Joe Perches: use (?: ... ) to avoid unnecessary capture groups rename smp_barriers

...river.patch has no obvious style problems and is ready for submission. Looks like a bug in checkpatch.pl: # check for spinlock_t definitions without a comment. if ($line =~ /^.\s*(struct\s+mutex|spinlock_t)\s+\S+;/ || $line =~ /^.\s*(DEFINE_MUTEX)\s*\(/) { my $which = $1; if (!ctx_has_comment($first_line, $linenr)) { CHK("UNCOMMENTED_DEFINITION", "$1 definition without comment\n" . $herecurr); } } Since your mutex definition has the 'static' keyword in front of it checkpatch.pl misses it! Andy: Is this checkpa...

...river.patch has no obvious style problems and is ready for submission. Looks like a bug in checkpatch.pl: # check for spinlock_t definitions without a comment. if ($line =~ /^.\s*(struct\s+mutex|spinlock_t)\s+\S+;/ || $line =~ /^.\s*(DEFINE_MUTEX)\s*\(/) { my $which = $1; if (!ctx_has_comment($first_line, $linenr)) { CHK("UNCOMMENTED_DEFINITION", "$1 definition without comment\n" . $herecurr); } } Since your mutex definition has the 'static' keyword in front of it checkpatch.pl misses it! Andy: Is this checkpa...

...my $all_barriers = join('|', (@barriers, @smp_barriers)); > + > + if ($line =~ /\b($all_barriers)\(/) { It would be better to use /\b$all_barriers\s*\(/ as there's no reason for the capture and there could be a space between the function and the open parenthesis. > ? if (!ctx_has_comment($first_line, $linenr)) { > ? WARN("MEMORY_BARRIER", > ? ?????"memory barrier without comment\n" . $herecurr);

...my $all_barriers = join('|', (@barriers, @smp_barriers)); > + > + if ($line =~ /\b($all_barriers)\(/) { It would be better to use /\b$all_barriers\s*\(/ as there's no reason for the capture and there could be a space between the function and the open parenthesis. > ? if (!ctx_has_comment($first_line, $linenr)) { > ? WARN("MEMORY_BARRIER", > ? ?????"memory barrier without comment\n" . $herecurr);

As part of memory barrier cleanup, this patchset extends checkpatch to make it easier to stop incorrect memory barrier usage. This replaces the checkpatch patches in my series arch: barrier cleanup + barriers for virt and will be included in the pull request including the series. changes from v3: rename smp_barrier_stems to barrier_stems as suggested by Julian Calaby. add (?: ... ) around a

As part of memory barrier cleanup, this patchset extends checkpatch to make it easier to stop incorrect memory barrier usage. This replaces the checkpatch patches in my series arch: barrier cleanup + barriers for virt and will be included in the pull request including the series. changes from v3: rename smp_barrier_stems to barrier_stems as suggested by Julian Calaby. add (?: ... ) around a

...} @barriers); - my $all_barriers = join('|', (@barriers, @smp_barriers)); + my @virt_barriers = map {my $l = $_; $l =~ s/smp_/virt_/; $l} @smp_barriers; + my $all_barriers = join('|', (@barriers, @smp_barriers, @virt_barriers)); if ($line =~ /\b($all_barriers)\(/) { if (!ctx_has_comment($first_line, $linenr)) { -- MST

...; > It would be better to use /\b$all_barriers\s*\(/ > as there's no reason for the capture and there > could be a space between the function and the > open parenthesis. That's the way it was - space before ( will trigger other warnings. But sure, ok. > > > ? if (!ctx_has_comment($first_line, $linenr)) { > > ? WARN("MEMORY_BARRIER", > > ? ?????"memory barrier without comment\n" . $herecurr);

...my @smp_barriers = ('smp_store_release', 'smp_load_acquire', 'smp_store_mb'); + + @smp_barriers = (@smp_barriers, map {"smp_" . $_} @barriers); + my $all_barriers = join('|', (@barriers, @smp_barriers)); + + if ($line =~ /\b($all_barriers)\(/) { if (!ctx_has_comment($first_line, $linenr)) { WARN("MEMORY_BARRIER", "memory barrier without comment\n" . $herecurr); -- MST

...barriers = qr{ + mb| + rmb| + wmb| + read_barrier_depends + }x; + my $smp_barriers = qr{ + store_release| + load_acquire| + store_mb| + ($barriers) + }x; + my $all_barriers = qr{ + $barriers| + smp_($smp_barriers) + }x; + + if ($line =~ /\b($all_barriers)\s*\(/) { if (!ctx_has_comment($first_line, $linenr)) { WARN("MEMORY_BARRIER", "memory barrier without comment\n" . $herecurr); -- MST

...s+($underscore_smp_barriers)\s*\(/) { + WARN("MEMORY_BARRIER", + "__smp memory barriers shouldn't be used outside barrier.h and asm-generic\n" . $herecurr); + } + # check for waitqueue_active without a comment. if ($line =~ /\bwaitqueue_active\s*\(/) { if (!ctx_has_comment($first_line, $linenr)) { -- MST

On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 08:48:14PM +0800, Gonglei wrote: > diff --git a/drivers/crypto/virtio/virtio_crypto_algs.c b/drivers/crypto/virtio/virtio_crypto_algs.c > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..08b077f > --- /dev/null > +++ b/drivers/crypto/virtio/virtio_crypto_algs.c > @@ -0,0 +1,518 @@ > + /* Algorithms supported by virtio crypto device > + * > + * Authors: