search for: ctrl_barrier

...arch/sh/include/asm/barrier.h | 10 +++++++++- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/sh/include/asm/barrier.h b/arch/sh/include/asm/barrier.h index f887c64..0cc5735 100644 --- a/arch/sh/include/asm/barrier.h +++ b/arch/sh/include/asm/barrier.h @@ -32,7 +32,15 @@ #define ctrl_barrier() __asm__ __volatile__ ("nop;nop;nop;nop;nop;nop;nop;nop") #endif -#define __smp_store_mb(var, value) do { (void)xchg(&var, value); } while (0) +#define __smp_store_mb(var, value) do { \ + if (sizeof(var) != 4 && sizeof(var) != 1) { \ + WRITE_ONCE(var, value); \ + __smp_...

Changes since v1: - replaced my asm-generic patch with an equivalent patch already in tip - add wrappers with virt_ prefix for better code annotation, as suggested by David Miller - dropped XXX in patch names as this makes vger choke, Cc all relevant mailing lists on all patches (not personal email, as the list becomes too long then) I parked this in vhost tree for now, but the

Changes since v1: - replaced my asm-generic patch with an equivalent patch already in tip - add wrappers with virt_ prefix for better code annotation, as suggested by David Miller - dropped XXX in patch names as this makes vger choke, Cc all relevant mailing lists on all patches (not personal email, as the list becomes too long then) I parked this in vhost tree for now, but the

This is really trying to cleanup some virt code, as suggested by Peter, who said > You could of course go fix that instead of mutilating things into > sort-of functional state. This work is needed for virtio, so it's probably easiest to merge it through my tree - is this fine by everyone? Arnd, if you agree, could you ack this please? Note to arch maintainers: please don't

This is really trying to cleanup some virt code, as suggested by Peter, who said > You could of course go fix that instead of mutilating things into > sort-of functional state. This work is needed for virtio, so it's probably easiest to merge it through my tree - is this fine by everyone? Arnd, if you agree, could you ack this please? Note to arch maintainers: please don't

Changes since v2: - extended checkpatch tests for barriers, and added patches teaching it to warn about incorrect usage of barriers (__smp_xxx barriers are for use by asm-generic code only), should help prevent misuse by arch code to address comments by Russell King - patched more instances of xen to use virt_ barriers as suggested by Stefano Stabellini - implemented a 2 byte xchg on sh

Changes since v2: - extended checkpatch tests for barriers, and added patches teaching it to warn about incorrect usage of barriers (__smp_xxx barriers are for use by asm-generic code only), should help prevent misuse by arch code to address comments by Russell King - patched more instances of xen to use virt_ barriers as suggested by Stefano Stabellini - implemented a 2 byte xchg on sh