Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "ctlztest".
Did you mean:
cltest
2011 Jul 08
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM on ARM testing.
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 9:30 AM, Karel Gardas <karel.gardas at centrum.cz> wrote:
> On 07/ 8/11 05:26 PM, Eli Friedman wrote:
>>
>> Given that revision range, the only remotely likely culprit is 131463.
>> Which basically means that it "broke" because the default target
>> features changed.
>
> And you are right here. 131463 == 131464 which is
2011 Jul 08
3
[LLVMdev] LLVM on ARM testing.
On 07/ 8/11 05:26 PM, Eli Friedman wrote:
> Given that revision range, the only remotely likely culprit is 131463.
> Which basically means that it "broke" because the default target
> features changed.
And you are right here. 131463 == 131464 which is buggy. 131462 is OK.
Thanks,
Karel