search for: ctetreau

On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 3:37 PM Chris Tetreault <ctetreau at quicinc.com> wrote: > We’re talking about verbose output right? Verbose isn’t the default. > I'm fairly certain the issue in this thread is just the verbosity of -dump-input=fail. Yes, -vv makes it even more verbose by annotating input lines with good matches, etc., but that'...

...ts success/failure, and doesn't show any cause for failure , so I run it in verbose mode with: bin/llvm-lit -a ../llvm/test/CodeGen/my_test.ll In a terminal, the new default behaviour of FileCheck has become pretty unusable IMHO. ________________________________ From: Chris Tetreault <ctetreau at quicinc.com> Sent: 18 June 2020 20:49 To: Joel E. Denny <jdenny.ornl at gmail.com> Cc: Sjoerd Meijer <Sjoerd.Meijer at arm.com>; llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> Subject: RE: [llvm-dev] FileCheck Sjoerd specifically said “in verbose mode”, which I in...

...st-case in 1 file, and the current behaviour is already inconvenient, so don't see that as a solution. Cheers. ________________________________ From: Mehdi AMINI <joker.eph at gmail.com> Sent: 19 June 2020 09:32 To: Sjoerd Meijer <Sjoerd.Meijer at arm.com> Cc: Chris Tetreault <ctetreau at quicinc.com>; Joel E. Denny <jdenny.ornl at gmail.com>; llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] FileCheck On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 12:56 AM Sjoerd Meijer via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org<mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>&...

...avvy enough to be > able to configure the options, given reasonable documentation. > > > > Thanks, > > Christopher Tetreault > > > > *From:* Sjoerd Meijer <Sjoerd.Meijer at arm.com> > *Sent:* Thursday, June 18, 2020 9:45 AM > *To:* Chris Tetreault <ctetreau at quicinc.com> > *Cc:* llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > *Subject:* [EXT] Re: [llvm-dev] FileCheck > > > > > > I would guess that in a CI system the order doesn't matter much because > you look at a webpage? I looked at some build bots today/yesterday that now > als...

...arbitrary executables downloaded from the internet, which of course make sense, but I wanted to clarify that you don’t need to sudo.) From: llvm-dev <llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org> on behalf of Chris Tetreault via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> Reply-To: Chris Tetreault <ctetreau at quicinc.com> Date: Thursday, March 26, 2020 at 2:06 PM To: "ldionne at apple.com" <ldionne at apple.com> Cc: "llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>, Libc++ Dev <libcxx-dev at lists.llvm.org> Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] Bumping the CMake req...

...a llvm-commits <llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org<mailto:llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org>> ----- Date: Sun, 10 May 2020 02:34:12 +0200 From: Joerg Sonnenberger via llvm-commits <llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org<mailto:llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org>> To: Christopher Tetreault <ctetreau at quicinc.com<mailto:ctetreau at quicinc.com>>, Christopher Tetreault <llvmlistbot at llvm.org<mailto:llvmlistbot at llvm.org>> Cc: llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org<mailto:llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org> Subject: Re: [llvm] 2dea3f1 - [SVE] Add new VectorType subclasses Rep...

...stros, which distros should we consider, and how far back should we go (i.e. is it just the latest LTS or the last two LTS versions)? From: llvm-dev <llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org> on behalf of Chris Tetreault via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> Reply-To: Chris Tetreault <ctetreau at quicinc.com> Date: Wednesday, April 8, 2020 at 12:51 PM To: Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com> Cc: "llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] Upgrading LLVM's minimum required CMake version Visual studio 2019 ships with C...

Hi, I’d just like to interject to say that building within Visual Studio isn’t really that bad. Running the lit tests is a bit painful because the LLVM build tools that are integrated with the build system don’t play nice with msbuild. Particularly, I’ve never been able to actually cancel an invocation of lit or tablegen via visual studio. That said, there is a huge upside to building with

...grade only when > there’s a compelling reason, and this set of OSs is just a heuristic of > “most people probably already have this CMake version.” > > > > *From:* Shoaib Meenai <smeenai at fb.com> > *Sent:* Wednesday, April 8, 2020 12:58 PM > *To:* Chris Tetreault <ctetreau at quicinc.com>; Eric Christopher < > echristo at gmail.com> > *Cc:* llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > *Subject:* [EXT] Re: [llvm-dev] Upgrading LLVM's minimum required CMake > version > > > > Yeah, I don’t anticipate Windows posing problems. Also, it’s pretty common...

...oint is to upgrade only when there’s a compelling reason, and this set of OSs is just a heuristic of “most people probably already have this CMake version.” From: Shoaib Meenai <smeenai at fb.com<mailto:smeenai at fb.com>> Sent: Wednesday, April 8, 2020 12:58 PM To: Chris Tetreault <ctetreau at quicinc.com<mailto:ctetreau at quicinc.com>>; Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com<mailto:echristo at gmail.com>> Cc: llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org<mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> Subject: [EXT] Re: [llvm-dev] Upgrading LLVM's minimum required CMake version Yea...

...p Reames <listmail at philipreames.com> Cc: Alexandre Ganea <alexandre.ganea at ubisoft.com>; Shoaib Meenai <smeenai at fb.com>; Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com>; James Y Knight <jyknight at google.com>; LLVM Dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>; Chris Tetreault <ctetreau at quicinc.com> Subject: [EXT] Re: [llvm-dev] Upgrading LLVM's minimum required CMake version FWIW I do very much agree here. Currently we specify a base set of compiler tools and cmake versions, but at this point if we follow the proposals mentioned by Philip, Chris, and Reid we need to a...

...d at some build bots today/yesterday that now also show this, and yeah, it's fine either way, I was guessing. My primary use-case is usage in a terminal, and displaying the errors first followed by all input makes this pretty unusable. ________________________________ From: Chris Tetreault <ctetreau at quicinc.com> Sent: 18 June 2020 17:34 To: Sjoerd Meijer <Sjoerd.Meijer at arm.com> Cc: llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> Subject: RE: [llvm-dev] FileCheck For anybody viewing these failures through some sort of CI system, showing the error first then the in...

...#39;m actually a little disappointed that llvm::Optional doesn't already have this behavior (with arithmetic operators guarded by enable_if). Thanks, Christopher Tetreault From: David Sherwood <David.Sherwood at arm.com> Sent: Friday, November 6, 2020 12:18 AM To: Chris Tetreault <ctetreau at quicinc.com>; LLVM Dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> Subject: [EXT] RE: [llvm-dev] [Proposal] Introducing the concept of invalid costs to the IR cost model Hi Chris, Thanks for the reply. My email was really to just ask if people were ok with the idea in principle and I kind of deliber...

...this set of OSs is just a heuristic of > “most people probably already have this CMake version.” > > *From:*Shoaib Meenai <smeenai at fb.com <mailto:smeenai at fb.com>> > *Sent:* Wednesday, April 8, 2020 12:58 PM > *To:* Chris Tetreault <ctetreau at quicinc.com > <mailto:ctetreau at quicinc.com>>; Eric Christopher > <echristo at gmail.com <mailto:echristo at gmail.com>> > *Cc:* llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > *Subject:* [EXT] Re: [llvm-de...

...This majorly affects e.g. Mesa. Joerg ----- Forwarded message from Joerg Sonnenberger via llvm-commits <llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org> ----- Date: Sun, 10 May 2020 02:34:12 +0200 From: Joerg Sonnenberger via llvm-commits <llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org> To: Christopher Tetreault <ctetreau at quicinc.com>, Christopher Tetreault <llvmlistbot at llvm.org> Cc: llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org Subject: Re: [llvm] 2dea3f1 - [SVE] Add new VectorType subclasses Reply-To: Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg at bec.de> On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 08:59:20AM -0700, Christopher Tetreault via ll...

> On Mar 25, 2020, at 19:42, Chris Tetreault <ctetreau at quicinc.com> wrote: > > I would like to just chime in and say that I’m fairly strongly opposed to any blanket version increases without justification. Having a low version requirement is a feature. It means that more people can build the codebase. We should increase the minimum CMake v...

...to have to > remember to fixup the permissions every time you invoke clang-format. > > > > Thanks, > > Christopher Tetreault > > > > *From:* Adrian McCarthy <amccarth at google.com> > *Sent:* Monday, April 20, 2020 8:36 AM > *To:* Chris Tetreault <ctetreau at quicinc.com> > *Cc:* LLVM Dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>; cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org > *Subject:* [EXT] Re: [llvm-dev] clang-format sets executable permission > on windows (openNativeFile ignores mode on Windows) > > > > I don't claim to understand NTFS permiss...

...g executable permissions on source files. It would be hugely annoying to have to remember to fixup the permissions every time you invoke clang-format. Thanks, Christopher Tetreault From: Adrian McCarthy <amccarth at google.com> Sent: Monday, April 20, 2020 8:36 AM To: Chris Tetreault <ctetreau at quicinc.com> Cc: LLVM Dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>; cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org Subject: [EXT] Re: [llvm-dev] clang-format sets executable permission on windows (openNativeFile ignores mode on Windows) I don't claim to understand NTFS permissions fully, but this mostly sounds lik...

...idea in principle and I kind of deliberately avoided getting into too many details at this point. If people are happy with the idea in principle I can push a patch up soon that shows what such a class could like so that people can comment on it? Regards, David Sherwood. From: Chris Tetreault <ctetreau at quicinc.com> Sent: 05 November 2020 19:23 To: David Sherwood <David.Sherwood at arm.com>; LLVM Dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> Subject: RE: [llvm-dev] [Proposal] Introducing the concept of invalid costs to the IR cost model You're being quite vague about what the extra state...

...t up and running - because we've asked them to do one thing doesn't mean it's low-cost to ask them to do another thing. On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 11:20 AM Mehdi AMINI via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 9:16 AM Chris Tetreault <ctetreau at quicinc.com> > wrote: > >> > You're saying "doesn’t mean that we should" while I've been saying in >> this situation that "we can", there is quite a difference here I believe. >> >> >> >> Technically “we can” do anything...