search for: ctdb_tcp_client

Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "ctdb_tcp_client".

2010 Jun 21
0
SAMBA + CTDB
...igure' command: ./configure --with-cluster-support --with-shared-modules=idmap_tdb2 --with-ads --enable-pie=no and unfortunatelly I have following error: checking for ctdb.h... no checking for ctdb_private.h... no checking for CTDB_CONTROL_TRANS3_COMMIT declaration... yes checking for struct ctdb_tcp_client... no checking for struct ctdb_control_tcp... yes checking for struct ctdb_control_tcp_addr... yes checking cluster support... configure: error: "ctdb_private.h is required for cluster support" In config.log I can see: configure:73944: checking for ctdb.h configure:73975: gcc -c -O -D...
2010 Feb 04
3
3.3 and 3.4 compile failure on dbwrap
...es checking that statvfs.statvfs_f_flag works... yes checking that statvfs.statvfs_f_flags works... no checking if large file support can be enabled... yes checking for ctdb.h... no checking for ctdb_private.h... no checking for CTDB_CONTROL_TRANS2_COMMIT_RETRY declaration... no checking for struct ctdb_tcp_client... no checking for struct ctdb_control_tcp... no checking for struct ctdb_control_tcp_addr... no checking cluster support... no checking whether to support ACLs... auto configure: checking whether ACL support is available: configure: Using solaris ACLs checking whether to support asynchronous io......
2010 May 11
1
Samba 3.5.2 compile on AIX
...s... yes checking that statvfs.statvfs_f_flag works... yes checking that statvfs.statvfs_f_flags works... no checking if large file support can be enabled... yes checking for ctdb.h... no checking for ctdb_private.h... no checking for CTDB_CONTROL_TRANS3_COMMIT declaration... no checking for struct ctdb_tcp_client... no checking for struct ctdb_control_tcp... no checking for struct ctdb_control_tcp_addr... no checking cluster support... no checking whether to support ACLs... auto configure: checking whether ACL support is available: configure: Using AIX ACLs checking whether to support asynchronous io... no...