search for: csums

Hi, I have some errors in dmesg: [ 542.255788] ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0xffffff SErr 0x0 action 0x0 [ 542.255797] ata1.00: irq_stat 0x40000008 [ 542.255805] ata1.00: failed command: READ FPDMA QUEUED [ 542.255821] ata1.00: cmd 60/00:00:1a:b7:7a/04:00:1d:00:00/40 tag 0 ncq 524288 in [ 542.255824] res 41/40:00:a0:b7:7a/00:00:1d:00:00/40 Emask 0x409 (media error) <F> [

We have a Zenoss server in our main office monitoring (among many other things) an Apache server in a remote network, with a Tinc link between the two networks. The monitoring simply involves making an HTTP request to a URL once every 5 minutes and confirming that a response page comes back. Most of the requests to this particular web server succeed (and similar requests to other web servers

On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 19:34:21 -0400, Nathan Stratton Treadway wrote: > It seems that when the cksum is incorrect, it is always off by 1. > [...] > Am I correct in concluding that this cksum problem is a bug in Tinc? After investigating this further, I'm fairly certain that problem originates in the following lines of the clamp_mss() function in route.c: [...] csum ^=

Hi, I added a new drive to an existing RAID 0 array. Every attempt to rebalance the array fails: # btrfs filesystem balance /share/bd8 ERROR: error during balancing ''/share/bd8'' - Input/output error # dmesg | tail btrfs: found 1 extents btrfs: relocating block group 10752513540096 flags 1 btrfs: found 5 extents btrfs: found 5 extents btrfs: relocating block group 10751439798272

I converted an ext4 filesystem with btrfs-convert, mounted it, and wanted to do "lzop -d ...". The result was an immediate Oops (btrfs is on LVM, on dm-crypt, on /dev/sdb which is USB-connected). mini-904.img.lzo dentry_open failed BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at ffffffcd IP: [<c01b5f36>] fput+0x6/0x30 *pde = 00575067 *pte = 00000000 Oops: 0002 [#1] SMP last sysfs

SAMSUNG SSD 830 Series CPU0: Intel® Core(TM) i7-2820QM CPU @ 2.30GHz (fam: 06, model: 2a, stepping: 07) 8GB RAM (quite heavily tested, not recently, with several days of memtest) kernel 3.11.1-200.fc19.x86_64 running on baremetal btrfs-progs-0.20.rc1.20130308git704a08c-1.fc19.x86_64 Today I did a scrub on a btrfs volume, with no message or errors in console or dmesg or journal. Immediately after

On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 04:14:16PM +0100, Cédric Bosdonnat wrote: > Getting checksum involves the same code than verifying them. Create > a get_checksum function and use it in verify_checksum. > --- > mllib/checksums.ml | 25 ++++++++++++++++--------- > mllib/checksums.mli | 9 +++++++++ > 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > > diff --git

Originally an attempt to fix: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1570407 However this isn't a complete fix. The OVA supplied doesn't even conform to VMware's own "specification" (I use the word loosely). The OVF inside the OVA references the disk.vmdk file, but the OVA doesn't contain that disk.vmdk file, only a snapshot called disk.vmdk.000000000. Therefore

In order to improve the performance of fsync, we use the outstanding ordered extents to avoid looking up the checksum from the csum tree. But we didn''t filter out the ordered extents whose csum is still being calculated, when we got those ordered extents, we had to wait for the csum calculation. It made the performance dropped down suddenly. (On my box, it drop down from 56MB/s to

As mentioned on Google+, I have a partition that I can no longer mount normally, containing a lot of my personal data and all backups from my laptop. I found now that I am still able to mount it using the ''nospace_cache'' option, but it takes a couple of minutes and I get "INFO: task btrfs-transacti:1698 blocked for more than 120 seconds." messages reporting the thread

Could the problem be that the e100 can do IP receive checksumming on the board, but the eepro driver doesn't enable it. When the board is doing checksum offload, then the csum field isn't set. Please try disabling receive checksumming on the e100 driver modprobe e100 XsumRX=0 If this is the problem, it exists both 2.4 and 2.6. On Wed, 27 Aug 2003 18:24:57 +0200 Hannes Schulz

On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 3:21 AM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 11:39:14AM +0800, xiangxia.m.yue at gmail.com wrote: > > From: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue at gmail.com> > > > > Open vSwitch and Linux bridge will disable LRO of the interface > > when this interface added to them. Now when disable the LRO, the >

On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 3:21 AM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 11:39:14AM +0800, xiangxia.m.yue at gmail.com wrote: > > From: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue at gmail.com> > > > > Open vSwitch and Linux bridge will disable LRO of the interface > > when this interface added to them. Now when disable the LRO, the >

Hello, I''m using kernel 3.1.0 and I have both / and /home as btrfs. I used suspend to ram quite often and never had a problem, but yesterday I''ve suspended to get into a plane and when I resumed my /home was all about input/output errors. Reboot did not help either. My root (/) did not suffer any problems. Today I''ve upgraded btrfs-progs to latest GIT and tried scrub

Getting checksum involves the same code than verifying them. Create a get_checksum function and use it in verify_checksum. --- mllib/checksums.ml | 20 +++++++++----------- mllib/checksums.mli | 3 +++ 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/mllib/checksums.ml b/mllib/checksums.ml index dfa8c3ae7..3efc764b9 100644 --- a/mllib/checksums.ml +++ b/mllib/checksums.ml @@

Getting checksum involves the same code than verifying them. Create a get_checksum function and use it in verify_checksum. --- mllib/checksums.ml | 25 ++++++++++++++++--------- mllib/checksums.mli | 9 +++++++++ 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/mllib/checksums.ml b/mllib/checksums.ml index 1009e131c..bee829085 100644 --- a/mllib/checksums.ml +++

>From the manpage: --csum-length=LENGTH By default the primary checksum used in rsync is a very strong 16 byte MD4 checksum. In most cases you will find that a trun- cated version of this checksum is quite efficient, and this will decrease the size of the checksum data sent over the link, mak- ing things faster. You can choose the

Hi, this small series moves the OCaml Checksums module from virt-builder to mllib, adding more features to use it also for v2v. Thanks, Pino Toscano (4): mllib: move Checksums from builder mllib, builder: add and use Checksums.of_string mllib: add SHA1 support in Checksums v2v: -i ova: use Checksums builder/Makefile.am | 2 -- builder/builder.ml | 6 +++-

Hi Ashish, I have tested with your xml in the first mail, and it works for rx_queue_size(see below). multiqueue need to work with vhost backend driver. And when you set "queues=1" it will ignored. Please check your qemu-kvm-rhev package, should be newer than qemu-kvm-rhev-2.9.0-16.el7_4.2 And the logs? tx_queue_size='512' will not work in the guest with direct type interface,

Hi Michal, What I found was that when I restarted the machine and did a virsh edit command to see the xml config, I see that it is was not actually changed. This suggests why I saw 256 again after restarting. So now I tried again to edit the xml via virsh edit command and used the following to set the parameters. <driver name='qemu' txmode='iothread' ioeventfd='on'