search for: cse12

...5 at 5:25 AM, Rafael Espíndola < rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote: > Two options: > > * Try passing -fuse-ld=gold to clang. > * have 'ld' be a symlink to ld.gold. > > Cheers, > Rafael > > > > On 22 June 2015 at 04:02, Aditya Verma <aditya.verma.cse12 at iitbhu.ac.in> > wrote: > > > > I have been trying to enable the gold linker on FreeBSD to use the link > time > > optimizations. I made gold from the binutils under /usr/ports. After > > building binutils using make -k install clean i got ld under /usr/bin > a...

I have been trying to enable the gold linker on FreeBSD to use the link time optimizations. I made gold from the binutils under /usr/ports. After building binutils using make -k install clean i got ld under /usr/bin and in the directory /usr/local/bin i got ld, ld.gold and ld.bfd. Now while trying to use link time optimization for the simple example programs

Hi I followed the steps on http://llvm.org/docs/GoldPlugin.html#lto-how-to-build to build the gold plugin on FreeBSD but ! Heres a link to the screenshot of the error: http://postimg.org/image/anlpuufbl/ This is the error message that it shows and so I am also unable to get ld-new. I checked and no CFLAGS were set in etc/make.conf. How to proceed with the installation? I am using the deault

I triend the command make all-gold -k But the error message that it says now is: /usr/binutils/gold/system.h:38:11:fatal error: 'libintl.h' file not found #include <libintl.h> On Saturday, May 30, 2015, John Criswell <jtcriswel at gmail.com> wrote: > Dear Aditya, > > Regarding the error, it looks like binutils is trying to build its > documentation. For

Hi I want to pursue a project based to improve the existing KCoFI method which is the Control Flow integrity method for commodity os. Since KCoFI is a llvm based project I plan to undertake the project to improve the existing KCoFI method. Following are the improvements that I want to pursue: 1. To improve the call graph used in KCoFI. Implement a stronger call graph. 2. Port the KCoFI to

Hi In my previous mail I mentioned the project on KCoFI( the control FLow integrity methods for commodity hardware http://sva.cs.illinois.edu/pubs/KCoFI-Oakland-2014.pdf ). Will it be more helpful to the community if I do the improvements number #1 and #3 mentioned in my previous mail to the mailing list or if i try to port it to arm architecture? I have decided to go ahead with the improvements