search for: cryptsda2

Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "cryptsda2".

Did you mean: cryptodan
2020 Sep 17
1
Re: [PATCH v2 7/7] lib/canonical-name.c: Hide errors.
...es “XXX” comment. This turns out to be necessary in order to > suppress a warning when inspecting Windows BitLocker-encrypted guests. > > The warning (which still appears in debugging output even with this > patch) is: > > libguestfs: error: lvm_canonical_lv_name: /dev/mapper/cryptsda2: not a logical volume > --- > lib/canonical-name.c | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/lib/canonical-name.c b/lib/canonical-name.c > index 052bbf12c..11cf6fed6 100644 > --- a/lib/canonical-name.c > +++ b/lib/canonical-name.c > @@ -...
2020 Sep 07
0
[PATCH v2 7/7] lib/canonical-name.c: Hide errors.
Fixes “XXX” comment. This turns out to be necessary in order to suppress a warning when inspecting Windows BitLocker-encrypted guests. The warning (which still appears in debugging output even with this patch) is: libguestfs: error: lvm_canonical_lv_name: /dev/mapper/cryptsda2: not a logical volume --- lib/canonical-name.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/lib/canonical-name.c b/lib/canonical-name.c index 052bbf12c..11cf6fed6 100644 --- a/lib/canonical-name.c +++ b/lib/canonical-name.c @@ -46,8 +46,9 @@ guestfs_impl_canonical_device_n...
2020 Sep 07
9
[PATCH v2 0/7] Windows BitLocker support.
Original version linked from here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808977#c8 There is no change in the code in this series, but feedback from the original series was we shouldn't lose the error message in patch 7. When I tested this just now in fact we don't lose the error if debugging is enabled, but I have updated the commit message to note what the error message is in the