Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "cryptsda2".
Did you mean:
cryptodan
2020 Sep 17
1
Re: [PATCH v2 7/7] lib/canonical-name.c: Hide errors.
...es “XXX” comment. This turns out to be necessary in order to
> suppress a warning when inspecting Windows BitLocker-encrypted guests.
>
> The warning (which still appears in debugging output even with this
> patch) is:
>
> libguestfs: error: lvm_canonical_lv_name: /dev/mapper/cryptsda2: not a logical volume
> ---
> lib/canonical-name.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/canonical-name.c b/lib/canonical-name.c
> index 052bbf12c..11cf6fed6 100644
> --- a/lib/canonical-name.c
> +++ b/lib/canonical-name.c
> @@ -...
2020 Sep 07
0
[PATCH v2 7/7] lib/canonical-name.c: Hide errors.
Fixes “XXX” comment. This turns out to be necessary in order to
suppress a warning when inspecting Windows BitLocker-encrypted guests.
The warning (which still appears in debugging output even with this
patch) is:
libguestfs: error: lvm_canonical_lv_name: /dev/mapper/cryptsda2: not a logical volume
---
lib/canonical-name.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/lib/canonical-name.c b/lib/canonical-name.c
index 052bbf12c..11cf6fed6 100644
--- a/lib/canonical-name.c
+++ b/lib/canonical-name.c
@@ -46,8 +46,9 @@ guestfs_impl_canonical_device_n...
2020 Sep 07
9
[PATCH v2 0/7] Windows BitLocker support.
Original version linked from here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808977#c8
There is no change in the code in this series, but feedback from the
original series was we shouldn't lose the error message in patch 7.
When I tested this just now in fact we don't lose the error if
debugging is enabled, but I have updated the commit message to note
what the error message is in the