Displaying 14 results from an estimated 14 matches for "cryptorandom".
2018 Sep 18
3
Bias in R's random integers?
...irst?
I believe this issue was also raised by Killie & Philip in
http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Bug-in-sample-td4729483.html, and more
recently in
https://www.stat.berkeley.edu/~stark/Preprints/r-random-issues.pdf,
pointing to the python implementation for comparison:
https://github.com/statlab/cryptorandom/blob/master/cryptorandom/cryptorandom.py#L265
Thanks!
Carl
--
http://carlboettiger.info
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
2018 Sep 19
2
Bias in R's random integers?
...lie & Philip in
> > http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Bug-in-sample-td4729483.html, and more
> > recently in
> > https://www.stat.berkeley.edu/~stark/Preprints/r-random-issues.pdf,
> > pointing to the python implementation for comparison:
> > https://github.com/statlab/cryptorandom/blob/master/cryptorandom/cryptorandom.py#L265
>
> I think the analyses are correct, but I doubt if a change to the default
> is likely to be accepted as it would make it more difficult to reproduce
> older results.
>
> On the other hand, a contribution of a new function like sampl...
2018 Sep 19
2
Bias in R's random integers?
...r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Bug-in-sample-td4729483.html, and more
> >>> recently in
> >>> https://www.stat.berkeley.edu/~stark/Preprints/r-random-issues.pdf,
> >>> pointing to the python implementation for comparison:
> >>>
> https://github.com/statlab/cryptorandom/blob/master/cryptorandom/cryptorandom.py#L265
> >>
> >> I think the analyses are correct, but I doubt if a change to the default
> >> is likely to be accepted as it would make it more difficult to reproduce
> >> older results.
> >>
> >> On the o...
2018 Sep 19
2
Bias in R's random integers?
...berkeley.edu/~stark/Preprints/r-random-issues.pdf
> > <
> https://www.stat.berkeley.edu/%7Estark/Preprints/r-random-issues.pdf>,
> > >>> pointing to the python implementation for comparison:
> > >>>
> >
> https://github.com/statlab/cryptorandom/blob/master/cryptorandom/cryptorandom.py#L265
> > >>
> > >> I think the analyses are correct, but I doubt if a change to the
> > default
> > >> is likely to be accepted as it would make it more difficult to
> > reproduce
> &g...
2018 Sep 19
0
Bias in R's random integers?
...ue was also raised by Killie & Philip in
> http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Bug-in-sample-td4729483.html, and more
> recently in
> https://www.stat.berkeley.edu/~stark/Preprints/r-random-issues.pdf,
> pointing to the python implementation for comparison:
> https://github.com/statlab/cryptorandom/blob/master/cryptorandom/cryptorandom.py#L265
I think the analyses are correct, but I doubt if a change to the default
is likely to be accepted as it would make it more difficult to reproduce
older results.
On the other hand, a contribution of a new function like sample() but
not suffering fro...
2018 Sep 19
0
Bias in R's random integers?
...p in
>>> http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Bug-in-sample-td4729483.html, and more
>>> recently in
>>> https://www.stat.berkeley.edu/~stark/Preprints/r-random-issues.pdf,
>>> pointing to the python implementation for comparison:
>>> https://github.com/statlab/cryptorandom/blob/master/cryptorandom/cryptorandom.py#L265
>>
>> I think the analyses are correct, but I doubt if a change to the default
>> is likely to be accepted as it would make it more difficult to reproduce
>> older results.
>>
>> On the other hand, a contribution of a...
2018 Sep 19
0
Bias in R's random integers?
...> https://www.stat.berkeley.edu/~stark/Preprints/r-random-issues.pdf
> <https://www.stat.berkeley.edu/%7Estark/Preprints/r-random-issues.pdf>,
> >>> pointing to the python implementation for comparison:
> >>>
> https://github.com/statlab/cryptorandom/blob/master/cryptorandom/cryptorandom.py#L265
> >>
> >> I think the analyses are correct, but I doubt if a change to the
> default
> >> is likely to be accepted as it would make it more difficult to
> reproduce
> >> older results...
2018 Sep 19
4
Bias in R's random integers?
...>
> > <
> https://www.stat.berkeley.edu/%7Estark/Preprints/r-random-issues.pdf>,
> > > >>> pointing to the python implementation for comparison:
> > > >>>
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/statlab/cryptorandom/blob/master/cryptorandom/cryptorandom.py#L265
> > > >>
> > > >> I think the analyses are correct, but I doubt if a change
> > to the
> > > default
> > > >> is likely to be accepted as it would mak...
2018 Sep 19
0
Bias in R's random integers?
...random-issues.pdf>
> >
> ?<https://www.stat.berkeley.edu/%7Estark/Preprints/r-random-issues.pdf>,
> >? ? ? >>> pointing to the python implementation for comparison:
> >? ? ? >>>
> >
> https://github.com/statlab/cryptorandom/blob/master/cryptorandom/cryptorandom.py#L265
> >? ? ? >>
> >? ? ? >> I think the analyses are correct, but I doubt if a change
> to the
> >? ? ?default
> >? ? ? >> is likely to be accepted as it would make it more
> diffic...
2018 Sep 19
2
Bias in R's random integers?
...eley.edu/%7Estark/Preprints/r-random-issues.pdf>,
> > > > >>> pointing to the python implementation for
> comparison:
> > > > >>>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/statlab/cryptorandom/blob/master/cryptorandom/cryptorandom.py#L265
> > > > >>
> > > > >> I think the analyses are correct, but I doubt if a
> > change
> > > to the
> > > > default
> > >...
2018 Sep 19
2
Bias in R's random integers?
...u/%7Estark/Preprints/r-random-issues.pdf>,
>> ???? >? ? ? >? ? ? >>> pointing to the python implementation for
>> comparison:
>> ???? >? ? ? >? ? ? >>>
>> ???? >? ? ? >
>> ???? >
>> ???
>> https://github.com/statlab/cryptorandom/blob/master/cryptorandom/cryptorandom.py#L265
>>
>> ???? >? ? ? >? ? ? >>
>> ???? >? ? ? >? ? ? >> I think the analyses are correct, but I doubt if a
>> ??? change
>> ???? >? ? ?to the
>> ???? >? ? ? >? ? ?default
>> ???? &g...
2018 Sep 19
0
Bias in R's random integers?
...?<https://www.stat.berkeley.edu/%7Estark/Preprints/r-random-issues.pdf>,
> >? ? ? >? ? ? >>> pointing to the python implementation for comparison:
> >? ? ? >? ? ? >>>
> >? ? ? >
> >
> https://github.com/statlab/cryptorandom/blob/master/cryptorandom/cryptorandom.py#L265
> >? ? ? >? ? ? >>
> >? ? ? >? ? ? >> I think the analyses are correct, but I doubt if a
> change
> >? ? ?to the
> >? ? ? >? ? ?default
> >? ? ? >? ? ? >> is lik...
2018 Sep 19
0
Bias in R's random integers?
...gt; >,
> >> > > >>> pointing to the python implementation for
> >> comparison:
> >> > > >>>
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> https://github.com/statlab/cryptorandom/blob/master/cryptorandom/cryptorandom.py#L265
> >>
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> I think the analyses are correct, but I doubt if a
> >> change
> >> > to the
> >> > >...
2018 Sep 19
0
Bias in R's random integers?
...dom-issues.pdf>,
> >? ? ? >? ? ? >? ? ? >>> pointing to the python implementation for
> comparison:
> >? ? ? >? ? ? >? ? ? >>>
> >? ? ? >? ? ? >
> >? ? ? >
> >
> https://github.com/statlab/cryptorandom/blob/master/cryptorandom/cryptorandom.py#L265
> >? ? ? >? ? ? >? ? ? >>
> >? ? ? >? ? ? >? ? ? >> I think the analyses are correct, but I
> doubt if a
> >? ? ?change
> >? ? ? >? ? ?to the
> >? ? ? >? ? ? >...