Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "crudify".
Did you mean:
crucify
2007 May 31
4
[LLVMdev] Advice on a VStudio specific patch
...return To > to;
}
friend bool operator<(unsigned to, const Edge& edge) {
return edge.operator>(to);
}
There is a similar set of additions for ScopedRange.
Adding the alternate comparitors and the return won't make things less
portable, but it does crudify the code somewhat in order to get around
the limitations of the compiler. Having a bunch of #ifdefs for VStudio
probably is crudier still, however. :-)
What do you think?
Thanks,
Chuck.
-----Original Message-----
From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu]
On Be...
2007 May 31
0
[LLVMdev] Advice on a VStudio specific patch
On Thu, 31 May 2007, Chuck Rose III wrote:
> Our project is cross platform and on Windows we use VStudio 2005.
> VStudio presents a couple of issues related around it's STL
> implementation and also it's non-respect for the no-return semantic of
> abort().
Ok. We want the source to be portable, so it's goodness to get these
fixes into the main tree.
> I've fixed
2007 May 31
2
[LLVMdev] Advice on a VStudio specific patch
Hola LLVMers,
Our project is cross platform and on Windows we use VStudio 2005.
VStudio presents a couple of issues related around it's STL
implementation and also it's non-respect for the no-return semantic of
abort().
I've fixed it locally, but I'd like to send a patch so I don't have to
do this every time I update from the source repository. So.... if I'm