search for: cruder

...for detecting non-convergence and enforcing half-duplex in that case, but I'd like to better than that if I can. I initially assumed that the echo suppressor is similar to other echo suppressors (also called "nonlinear processors" or "loss controls"). Those suppressors use cruder algorithms that exhibit artifacts but that may not depend on the fine time structure of the audio signals. Is this not true of the preprocessor echo suppressor? -mjc -----Original Message----- From: Jean-Marc Valin [mailto:jean-marc.valin@usherbrooke.ca] Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2007 8:49 PM To:...

...the lost samples). As for how the residual echo suppression works, I've no idea, you need to try. > I initially assumed that the echo suppressor is similar to other echo > suppressors (also called "nonlinear processors" or "loss controls"). > Those suppressors use cruder algorithms that exhibit artifacts but that > may not depend on the fine time structure of the audio signals. Is this > not true of the preprocessor echo suppressor? Not sure what other echo suppressors do. Some are actually designed to act alone while others (like the Speex one) are designed...

...or how the residual echo suppression works, I've no idea, > you need to try. > > > I initially assumed that the echo suppressor is similar to other echo > > suppressors (also called "nonlinear processors" or "loss controls"). > > Those suppressors use cruder algorithms that exhibit artifacts but that > > may not depend on the fine time structure of the audio signals. Is this > > not true of the preprocessor echo suppressor? > > Not sure what other echo suppressors do. Some are actually designed to > act alone while others (like the...

...suppression works, I've no idea, > > you need to try. > > > > > I initially assumed that the echo suppressor is similar to other echo > > > suppressors (also called "nonlinear processors" or "loss controls"). > > > Those suppressors use cruder algorithms that exhibit artifacts but that > > > may not depend on the fine time structure of the audio signals. Is this > > > not true of the preprocessor echo suppressor? > > > > Not sure what other echo suppressors do. Some are actually designed to > > act alo...

...the lost samples). As for how the residual echo suppression works, I've no idea, you need to try. > I initially assumed that the echo suppressor is similar to other echo > suppressors (also called "nonlinear processors" or "loss controls"). > Those suppressors use cruder algorithms that exhibit artifacts but that > may not depend on the fine time structure of the audio signals. Is this > not true of the preprocessor echo suppressor? Not sure what other echo suppressors do. Some are actually designed to act alone while others (like the Speex one) are designed...

HI all, I am trying to compute the EOF of a matrix using prcomp but unable to get the expansion co-efficients. is it possible using prcomp or are there any other methods thanks nuncio -- Nuncio.M Research Scientist National Center for Antarctic and Ocean research Head land Sada Vasco da Gamma Goa-403804 [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

What are the limitations on size of matrix for MDS functions? steve -- Steve Antos Priva-Technologies 847-640-9020 x3114 cell (540)409-1231 [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1985 ------- Additional Comments From Uwe.Girlich@philosys.de 2004-11-02 23:13 ------- Created an attachment (id=753) --> (https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=753&action=view) shell script to reproduce the rsync problem This shell script creates some directories, a file and a named pipe. Then it tries to copy the "from"

Hello, Does anyone know the answer to this question below? (Note... they're calling the Theora codec "Ogg" below. I know technically it's not correct... but that's what some are calling it.) ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Enric <enric.media@gmail.com> Date: Aug 19, 2007 10:13 AM Subject: [show-in-a-box] Re: Ogg To: show-in-a-box@googlegroups.com A

...or how the residual echo suppression works, I've no idea, > you need to try. > > > I initially assumed that the echo suppressor is similar to other echo > > suppressors (also called "nonlinear processors" or "loss controls"). > > Those suppressors use cruder algorithms that exhibit artifacts but that > > may not depend on the fine time structure of the audio signals. Is this > > not true of the preprocessor echo suppressor? > > Not sure what other echo suppressors do. Some are actually designed to > act alone while others (like the...

...bytes starting at a given offset should no longer be considered part of the file and the associated blocks given back to the file system's freelist. I realize that this might not be possible currently if the chunk you wish to free is not aligned with the start of a block etc. etc. A "cruder" interface, just giving whole disk blocks back would be acceptable, though. Your comments would be much appreciated, Rasmus Munk Larsen, Stanford University.

> Getting 10 samples at different commits will give you similar accuracy if > behaviour doesn't change, and you can rely on 10-point blocks before and > after each change to have the same result. Right. But this way you will have 10-commits delay. So, you will need 3-4 additional test runs to pinpoint the offending commit in the worst case. > This is why I proposed something like

...rigued by ggplot/ggmap). Particularly, I am able to overlay my plots with maps, which is essential for the sort of work I'm doing. However I'm currently unable to use lattice::layerplot for some regional data projected LCC: the data plots, but I cannot get a map to overlay. I can do this by cruder means, but would prefer to know how to do this in lattice/rasterVis or similar (or ggplot/ggmap). Two nearly-self-contained examples follow. The data, ozone_lcc.nc, comes with CRAN package=M3 ... except that M3 supplies it as system.file("extdata/ozone_lcc.ncf", package="M3")...

What is the current status of the residual echo suppressor in the preprocessor? I ask this because I have occasional problems with the AEC, in which it fails to cancel echo. I think the problems have to do with samples being dropped by the audio IO system, which is effectively impossible to detect and counteract reliably. A colleague recommended using an echo suppression technique (which he

Full_Name: James Signorovitch Version: 2.2.1 OS: WinXP Submission from: (NULL) (134.174.182.203) In the code below, fn1() and fn2() fail with the messages given in the comments. Strangely, fn2() fails for all data sets I've tried except for those with 100 rows. The same errors occur if glm() is used in place of lm(), or if R 2.1.1 is used on a unix system. Thanks for looking into this.

Richard Lee wrote: > But there is a caveat. Does Vorbis coupling preserve "phase" relations? Any references explaining this in simple detail? Sebastian : >"coupling" is a rather loose term in the sense that it doesn't exactly specify HOW it's done. It can be understood as the opposite of coding channels independently. Obviously there are many ways to do

I haven't been an R lister for a bit, but I hope to enlist someone's help here. I think this is a simple question, so I hope the answer is not much trouble. Can you please respond directly to this email address in addition to the list (if responding to the list is warranted)? I have a histogram and I want to see if the data fit a Poisson distribution. How do I do this? It is

Hi, I'm trying to workaround the lack of IMAP folder mapping settings on Windows 10 Mobile in regards to controlling the Sent, Trash etc folder my device uses. Currently, my device creates its own "Sent Items" folder "Deleted Items" folder along with others, this is pain when using clients like Thunderbird which places such them in the correct places, because it can be

Greetings all, As you have noticed, I have been largely absent from the wxruby team for quite a while now. Fortunately, others have taken charge and continued to move wxruby forward. It''s still a great project, but I just can''t participate right now. I will be unsubscribing from both the dev and users mailing lists in a couple days. Because I will be packing for a long trip

How do u calculated p values for a z test.. so far i ve done this A = read.table("cw3_data.txt") xbar = mean(A) s = 1 n = 20 mu = 0 z.test = (xbar-mu)/(s/sqrt(n)) p.value = pnorm(abs(z.test)) error = qnorm(0.99)*s/sqrt(n) left = xbar - error right = xbar + error and have got values off of it...but the values for p dont match up with other sites that i have used to check it