search for: crossrename

Dear all, Following [1] from a year ago, I'd like to know what is the state of the crossrename VFS module, and whether it's expected to be supported at least together with the recycle module? To be honest I'm quite sympathetic with the reasoning in [1] and I don't see a general use of crossrename. However, it remains relevant in the context of recycle, and currently I experie...

...??????? force group = "SUBDOM+worker" ??????? inherit permissions = Yes ??????? path = PATHNAME ??????? read only = No ??????? root preexec = /bin/MK_PAPIERKORB %H "%u" %h %S ??????? smb encrypt = desired ??????? valid users = +SUBDOM+worker ??????? vfs objects = recycle crossrename ??????? recycle:exclude_dir = tmp | temp | cache ??????? recycle:exclude = *.TMP | *.tmp | ~$*.doc ??????? recycle:noversions = *.ini | *.dat ??????? recycle:versions = Yes ??????? recycle:maxsize = 536870912 ??????? recycle:touch = Yes ??????? recycle:keeptree = Yes ??????? recycle:directo...

Hi Am 09.03.20 um 16:32 schrieb Rowland penny via samba: > On 09/03/2020 14:25, Andreas Hauffe via samba wrote: >> [global] >> ??????? dedicated keytab file = /etc/krb5.keytab >> ??????? kerberos method = secrets and keytab > Why the dedicated keytab ? We have a kerberized NFS4 running on that machine, too. > >> workgroup = ILRW >> ??????? idmap config dom :

...????? force directory mode = 0660 ??????? force group = SUBDOM\worker ??????? inherit permissions = Yes ??????? path = PATHNAME ??????? read only = No ??????? root preexec = /bin/MK_PAPIERKORB %H "%u" %h %S ??????? valid users = SUBDOM\worker ??????? vfs objects = acl_xattr recycle crossrename [share2] ??????? comment = Share 2 ??????? inherit acls = Yes ??????? path = PATHNAME ??????? read only = No ??????? valid users = SUBDOM\worker SUBDOM\user ??????? acl_xattr:ignore system acls = yes [share3] ??????? comment = Share 3 ??????? create mask = 0660 ??????? directory mask = 0...

Hi all, Is this something I should report in bugzilla? In my smb3.conf I have vfs object = recycle full_audit crossrename and when doing a classicupgrade, I'm getting a segmentation fault. It doesn't finish. (tried 4.1.2, 4.1.3, 4.1.4) When removing the line, the classicupgrade finishes successfully. It's easy to get around, but wouldn't it be nicer not to crash..? Regards, MJ

Hi, what do I have to do, to define a recycle folder outside a share e.g. the users home for each share? As far as I understand the default values, it's not allowed to leave the share folder. recycle:repository = /home/user/.recycle -- Viele Gr??e Andreas Hauffe

...0660 > ??????? force group = SUBDOM\worker > ??????? inherit permissions = Yes > ??????? path = PATHNAME > ??????? read only = No > ??????? root preexec = /bin/MK_PAPIERKORB %H "%u" %h %S > ??????? valid users = SUBDOM\worker > ??????? vfs objects = acl_xattr recycle crossrename > > [share2] > ??????? comment = Share 2 > ??????? inherit acls = Yes > ??????? path = PATHNAME > ??????? read only = No > ??????? valid users = SUBDOM\worker SUBDOM\user > ??????? acl_xattr:ignore system acls = yes > > [share3] > ??????? comment = Share 3 > ????...

...31072 usr/lib/lowcase.dat 131072 usr/lib/upcase.dat 65536 usr/lib/valid.dat 1024 usr/lib/vfs 30704 usr/lib/vfs/acl_tdb.so 26612 usr/lib/vfs/acl_xattr.so 18256 usr/lib/vfs/aio_fork.so 10052 usr/lib/vfs/audit.so 18316 usr/lib/vfs/cap.so 18320 usr/lib/vfs/catia.so 5908 usr/lib/vfs/crossrename.so 5848 usr/lib/vfs/default_quota.so 10000 usr/lib/vfs/dirsort.so 10004 usr/lib/vfs/expand_msdfs.so 14184 usr/lib/vfs/extd_audit.so 5844 usr/lib/vfs/fake_perms.so 47432 usr/lib/vfs/full_audit.so 9976 usr/lib/vfs/linux_xfs_sgid.so 14160 usr/lib/vfs/netatalk.so 10064 usr/lib/vfs/...

...ini/Desktop.ini/ntuser.ini/NTUSER.*/Thumbs.db/ ??????? inherit permissions = Yes ??????? path = /0nfs4exports/home/%U ??????? read only = No ??????? root preexec = /bin/MK_PAPIERKORB %H "%u" %h %S ??????? smb encrypt = required ??????? valid users = %U ??????? vfs objects = recycle crossrename ??????? recycle:repository = %H/.Papierkorb/%S ??????? recycle:directory_mode = 0700 ??????? recycle:keeptree = Yes ??????? recycle:touch = Yes ??????? recycle:maxsize = 536870912 ??????? recycle:versions = Yes ??????? recycle:noversions = *.ini | *.dat ??????? recycle:exclude = *.TMP | *.t...

...uot;client max protocol" to NT1 before ???? calling the "Reconnecting with SMB1 for workgroup listing" path. ?? * BUG 14944: Missing pop_sec_ctx() in error path inside close_directory(). o? Pavel Filipensk? <pfilipen at redhat.com> ?? * BUG 14940: Cross device copy of the crossrename module always fails. ?? * BUG 14941: symlinkat function from VFS cap module always fails with an ???? error. ?? * BUG 14942: Fix possible fsp pointer deference. o? Volker Lendecke <vl at samba.org> ?? * BUG 14934: kill_tcp_connections does not work. o? Stefan Metzmacher <metze at sam...

...uot;client max protocol" to NT1 before ???? calling the "Reconnecting with SMB1 for workgroup listing" path. ?? * BUG 14944: Missing pop_sec_ctx() in error path inside close_directory(). o? Pavel Filipensk? <pfilipen at redhat.com> ?? * BUG 14940: Cross device copy of the crossrename module always fails. ?? * BUG 14941: symlinkat function from VFS cap module always fails with an ???? error. ?? * BUG 14942: Fix possible fsp pointer deference. o? Volker Lendecke <vl at samba.org> ?? * BUG 14934: kill_tcp_connections does not work. o? Stefan Metzmacher <metze at sam...