search for: croitoru

...ackets:24452216 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:38068314 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 RX bytes:6777513704 (6.3 GiB) TX bytes:21817051849 (20.3 GiB) Interrupt:29 Base address:0xc000 Thanks, Eliezer Croitoru

...possible to achieve the same with CentOS but I do not know what is behind the gui that initiates the connection for l2tp. With pptp I have no issue and I have a connection which works a lot of time. Thanks, Eliezer On 18/09/2015 03:57, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 09/17/2015 04:47 PM, Eliezer Croitoru wrote: >> If someone used l2tp the same way I want to use on CentOS 7 please >> give me some advice. > > l2tp, by itself, offers no encryption. Notably, that means that your > password is going to cross the network in clear text. Bare l2tp is the > VPN equivalent of telnet...

...have all sorts of beta versions but not something they call stable in their downloads. I think I will try to use their product if I will not find an example on how to use l2tp without ipsec encryption. Thanks, Eliezer On 18/09/2015 03:00, John R Pierce wrote: > On 9/17/2015 4:47 PM, Eliezer Croitoru wrote: >> I have a server currently connecting to a pptp remote server. >> This server(lns\lac) has the option for pptp connections and l2tp >> connections. >> The l2tp connections are not using ipsec encryption at all. > > PPTP doesn't use ipsec either, it uses it...

I want to make sure that while compiling as root nothing will break down inside the machine. I want to compile software on a Xeon SERVER. The basic issue is that there is a recommendation to not compile it as a root user. I have compiled software as a root user more then once and I am not sure why would there is a need to run it as non-root user? I have taken a look at the /proc/ FS but I do

I have a server currently connecting to a pptp remote server. This server(lns\lac) has the option for pptp connections and l2tp connections. The l2tp connections are not using ipsec encryption at all. I have seen couple guides\tutorials on the internet: - https://raymii.org/s/tutorials/IPSEC_L2TP_vpn_on_CentOS_-_Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux_or_Scientific_-_Linux_6.html -

You could say the same thing about computers in general: I hate them, they automated many tasks in life and took many jobs out of the market!. Eliezer ---- Eliezer Croitoru Linux System Administrator Mobile: +972-5-28704261 Email: eliezer at ngtech.co.il -----Original Message----- From: CentOS [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of Gary Stainburn Sent: Monday, January 16, 2017 11:34 AM To: centos at centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS] Reliable way of having...

On Tuesday 10 January 2017 08:53:17 John R Pierce wrote: > On 1/9/2017 7:11 PM, fred roller wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 12:04 PM, Frank Cox<theatre at melvilletheatre.com> > > > > wrote: > >> That sounds like a weak signal from your wifi transmitter. > > > > Or signal interference. Where is the antennae located on the server? > > Ran

On 30/12/2015 10:22, Paul R. Ganci wrote: > > On 12/30/2015 12:44 AM, Eliezer Croitoru wrote: >> "I want that the request of incoming traffic dont use the default >> gateway. Incoming traffic sould be answered using the gateway of the >> incoming device " > > I'm sorry but I have been following this thread for a while and > everything that Gor...

Since I have lots of filtering rules in thunderbird I was thinking of using sieve instead. I want to filter incoming mail into subdirectories. like "from" store at folder "old". the script is: require ["fileinto", "envelope"]; if envelope :is "from" "eliezer at test.dom" { fileinto "old"; } else { # The rest goes into

On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 6:47 AM, Eliezer Croitoru <eliezer at ngtech.co.il> wrote: > I am unsure I understand what you wrote. > "XFS will create multiple AG's across all of those > devices," > Are you comparing md linear/concat to md raid0? and that the upper level XFS > will run on top them? Yes to the first...

...stand. So no l2tp client there but aleast a nice VPN service. SRPM can be found here: http://ngtech.co.il/rpm/centos/7/SRPMS/softethervpn-4.18.9570-2.el7.centos.src.rpm The repo is here(also latest squid-cache repo): http://ngtech.co.il/rpm/centos/7/x86_64/ Eliezer On 18/09/2015 04:33, Eliezer Croitoru wrote: > Hey John, > > I do not require encryption at all, it's a secure and internal channel > but it requires me to connect via either pptp or l2tp. > This is the reason I am asking. > I had the chance of finding the SoftEther Project which gives a lot in > terms of VPN C...

On 9/20/2015 6:00 PM, Eliezer Croitoru wrote: > I am interested in understanding the thing with BackupPC. > What does it have compared to basic rsync? its a full blown backup service for any number of client hosts, it maintains a pool of full and incremental backups going back as far as you care, and this pool is fully deduppe...

Hello, i follow your discussion. The first 2 posts using multiple default routes solve my problem perfect. Thank you all. J Am 2015-12-30 17:21, schrieb Eliezer Croitoru: > On 30/12/2015 10:22, Paul R. Ganci wrote: >> >> On 12/30/2015 12:44 AM, Eliezer Croitoru wrote: >>> "I want that the request of incoming traffic dont use the default >>> gateway. Incoming traffic sould be answered using the gateway of the >>> incom...

On Wed, January 18, 2017 4:24 am, Eliezer Croitoru wrote: > You could say the same thing about computers in general: > I hate them, they automated many tasks in life and took many jobs out of > the > market!. And they suck. All systems suck. And thanks to that I got my job. Valeri > > Eliezer > > ---- > Eliezer Croito...

Hi, Recently I'm noticing an interesting issue. My CentOS servers are trying to send logs to a logging server via 514/udp, however I'm not receiving anything. I did the following on CentOS *tcpdump -vvv -nn udp -i esn160 port 514* In another session on the same server: *nc syslog-server -u 514* tcpdump started to show me messages like: *[bad udp cksum 0x3ce9 -> 0xb0f5!] SYSLOG,

Hello, First let me apologize for posting about a GUI topic on here. There's a reason why I did that, and it's because the underlying concept of this is connected to Asterisk.Here's my situation: Twenty wifi clients connecting to our wireless router (Cisco Linksys E4200 loaded with Tomato). All these WiFi clients are running eyeBeam (in case you're wondering where the calls come

In squid we use a double layer of hashed directories on the FS to allow storage of millions of files. I was reading the "Directory hashing" section but never understood it.. since it's written.. in a way I could not understand. I am using this line: mail_location = maildir:/home/vmail/%d/%n/Maildir/ and I want to migrate to a hash based directory scheme. While trying to understand

I'd be looking at your logs to see if there is any indication why the wifi does not come up during boot > sudo journalctrl -b # current boot > sudo journalctrl -b -1 # previous boot Kal On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 7:59 AM, Eliezer Croitoru <eliezer at ngtech.co.il> wrote: > NetworkManger should work pretty nice and good as required. > Just run the right cronjob every minute to make sure the connection is up or > down and find out if it's possible to reconnect. > NetworkManager is kind of does all you need automa...

I was learning about the different FS exists. I was working on systems that ReiserFS was the star but since there is no longer support from the creator there are other consolidations to be done. I want to ask about couple FS options. EXT4 which is amazing for one node but for more it's another story. I have heard about GFS2 and GlusterFS and read the docs and official materials from RH on

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=541130 The bug I see is using thunderbird 24.6 which is the latest update on centos 6.5. The issue is that every time I open an email with some "+" somewhere in the source (which I didn't traced yet) I get annoying message: An error occurred while loading or saving configuration information for thunderbird. Some of your configuration