search for: crociani

...ootFS''  uuid: c87975a0-a575-405e-9890-d3f7f25bbd96     Total devices 2 FS bytes used 284.98GB     devid    2 size 311.82GB used 286.51GB path /dev/sdb3     devid    1 size 897.76GB used 286.51GB path /dev/sda3 /dev/sdb3 is the same. How can I resize /dev/sdb3? Regards, -- Marco Lorenzo Crociani, marco.crociani@gmail.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

...ing bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1442983 on glusterfs 3.10.11 and oVirt 4.1.9 (and before on glusterfs 3.8.14) The bug report says fixed in glusterfs-3.12.2-1 Is there a plan to backport the fix to 3.10.x releases or the only way to fix is upgrade to 3.12? Regards, -- Marco Crociani

...ed against 3.10.12 is low, and I decided to move this to the > 30th of Apr instead. > > Is there a specific fix that you are looking for in the release? > Hi, yes, it's this: https://review.gluster.org/19730 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1442983 Regards, -- Marco Crociani > Thanks, > Shyam > > On 04/06/2018 11:47 AM, Marco Lorenzo Crociani wrote: >> Hi, >> are there any news for 3.10.12 release? >> >> Regards, >>

Have sent a backport request https://review.gluster.org/19730 at release-3.10 branch. Hopefully this fix will be picked up in next update. On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 4:47 PM, Marco Lorenzo Crociani < marcoc at prismatelecomtesting.com> wrote: > Hi, > I'm hitting bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1442983 > on glusterfs 3.10.11 and oVirt 4.1.9 (and before on glusterfs 3.8.14) > > The bug report says fixed in glusterfs-3.12.2-1 > The above is not a com...

Fix that when scrub tries to repair an I/O or checksum error and one of the devices containing the mirror is missing, it crashes in bio_add_page because the bdev is a NULL pointer for missing devices. Reported-by: Marco L. Crociani <marco.crociani@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de> --- fs/btrfs/scrub.c | 7 +++++++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/scrub.c b/fs/btrfs/scrub.c index b679bf6..7e487be 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/scrub.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/scrub.c @@ -99...

Hi, are there any news for 3.10.12 release? Regards, -- Marco Crociani

On 09/04/2018 21:36, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: > On 04/09/2018 04:48 AM, Marco Lorenzo Crociani wrote: >> On 06/04/2018 19:33, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> We postponed this and I did not announce this to the lists. The number >>> of bugs fixed against 3.10.12 is low, and I decided to move this to the >>> 30th of Apr instead. >...

...lan to backport it? Greetings, ??? Paolo Il 16/03/2018 13:24, Atin Mukherjee ha scritto: > Have sent a backport request https://review.gluster.org/19730 at > release-3.10 branch. Hopefully this fix will be picked up in next update. > > On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 4:47 PM, Marco Lorenzo Crociani > <marcoc at prismatelecomtesting.com > <mailto:marcoc at prismatelecomtesting.com>> wrote: > > Hi, > I'm hitting bug > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1442983 > <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1442983> > on...

Hi, We postponed this and I did not announce this to the lists. The number of bugs fixed against 3.10.12 is low, and I decided to move this to the 30th of Apr instead. Is there a specific fix that you are looking for in the release? Thanks, Shyam On 04/06/2018 11:47 AM, Marco Lorenzo Crociani wrote: > Hi, > are there any news for 3.10.12 release? > > Regards, >

On 04/09/2018 04:48 AM, Marco Lorenzo Crociani wrote: > On 06/04/2018 19:33, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: >> Hi, >> >> We postponed this and I did not announce this to the lists. The number >> of bugs fixed against 3.10.12 is low, and I decided to move this to the >> 30th of Apr instead. >> >> Is there a...

Hi, I just happen to see that there are no Xen 3.1 packages in unstable as of yet - even if 3.1 is released since a while now. There are the Packages in Ralph's apt repository, but I wonder why there are no newer packages yet. This shouldn't be criticism, but two questions come up: 1) Is the reason that there are no newer packages that you need some more help? Then I might be able to

Hi, I have updated my debian etch and it stop booting with xen. I see the new 2.6.17 kernel in unstable and so I have installed it but also this doesn't work (it reboots during boot). -- Marco Crociani - Tyrael * Perch? usare Formati Aperti? - http://www.openformats.org * Debian GNU/Linux - http://www.debian.org

...#39;t AMD64 packages in unstable. Is ti related to this bug? http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=439662 In ubuntu it compiles on amd64. https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xen-3.1/3.1.0-0ubuntu15 Is there collaboration between debian xen team and ubuntu xen team? Regards, -- Marco Crociani - Tyrael * Perch? usare Formati Aperti? - http://www.openformats.org * Apri la mente, libera i tuoi pensieri. Usa Software Libero.

Hi, have you found a solution? Regards, -- Marco Crociani

...because it is on a remote server (it will be not funny if it doesn't come up on reboot). On the next week end I should have access to a AMD64 desktop so I will try it. Is Xen hypervisor 3.1 compatible with linux-image-2.6.18-4-xen-amd64 and linux-image-2.6.20-1-xen-amd64? Regards, -- Marco Crociani - Tyrael * Perch? usare Formati Aperti? - http://www.openformats.org * Apri la mente, libera i tuoi pensieri. Usa Software Libero.

...do to repair the disk? Is it possible to know which file is affected by the badblock? I found http://smartmontools.sourceforge.net/badblockhowto.html but is about to ext2/3/4 fs. I am concerned about the absence of fsck tool. Should I run badblocks on the unmounted fs? Thanks, -- Marco Lorenzo Crociani -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html