search for: crlfs

Just ran into a problem[1]. It seems to have been introduced by changeset 224 [2], a fix for ticket 126 [3]. The root is the number of CRLFs Camping puts between the headers and the body of the response. This has changed at least 3 times; right now we''re back to 1. (ie. every header ends in a CRLF, and then there''s the body) The HTTP RFC[4], the CGI spec[5] and the FastCGI FAQ[6] all seem to agree that there should be...

...ader and the body. At least, this is what both Pine and Thunderbird do, so I suspect it's correct according to the IMAP specs, though perhaps there are grey areas around 8bit messages with no transfer-encoding. When Dovecot stores the message in the mbox file, it *used* to convert all the CRLFs to LF. Since the change, it is still converting the CRLFs in the header, but is leaving them intact in the body. The result is a weird hybrid format within the file. FETCH seems to undo the damage - at least, it sends back data with CRLF in both the header and the body - so provided the only...

Hi all, I am starting fresh with a local repository of mails, which almost certainly have duplicates in them. I am going to use maildirs, and ensure all mails are input with CRLFs. The question is: does anybody know how I can find and remove duplicates, either while injecting mail with IMAP, or afterward? I can use tools to find duplicate Message-IDs, but don't know of a way to remove duplicates in mailboxes that are already imported as opposed to incoming mail. Perha...

Hi, I know I've brought this up before (see http://www.mail-archive.com/dovecot at dovecot.org/msg20974.html), and I've since upgraded to 1.2.6, but our vacation messages are still being rejected because of Bad_MIME. We are using Dovecot Sieve 0.1.12, the auto reply message contains ^M characters at the end of a few lines, they are only visable through vi, example: Received: from

We've just cut over to a new mail server running Dovecot 1.0.5. The underlying OS is RHEL 5. User mailboxes are stored in Unix mbox format on a local ext3 file system. The MTA on the system is the default RedHat version of Sendmail 8.13.8 with procmail for local delivery. We're using a combination of dotlock and fcntl style locking. The output of "dovecot -n" for this system

...ible? (doesn't seem so? why did I think it could be? look at the code) Important: - dict-server should have some config file which lists the allowed dicts - LDA: empty mail gives an error. - deliver: delivering mail to box smaller than mbox_min_index_size give close() errors - mbox: CRLFs in headers break the mbox - index: when mailbox is deleted/renamed and someone else had it open, we get stat() error messages in log file. Handle at least the most common places where it happens. - lib-storage - limit folder hierarchy levels? user can now create eg. a/a/a/a/... an...

...nd could have corrupted the mailbox - Using Dovecot without index files would crash after using a while - Partial BODY[header] or BODY[part] fetches were buggy if client requested more data than was available in the header/part. - Partial BODY[...] fetches were buggy with messages that had CRLFs - Some BODY and BODYSTRUCTURE replies missed data for message/rfc822 MIME parts causing clients to break - SORT (SUBJECT) was buggy - Timezone fixes with Date-header

...nd could have corrupted the mailbox - Using Dovecot without index files would crash after using a while - Partial BODY[header] or BODY[part] fetches were buggy if client requested more data than was available in the header/part. - Partial BODY[...] fetches were buggy with messages that had CRLFs - Some BODY and BODYSTRUCTURE replies missed data for message/rfc822 MIME parts causing clients to break - SORT (SUBJECT) was buggy - Timezone fixes with Date-header

...claration. This produces messages with *lot* of extra line feeds. Makes the messages nearly unreadable -- in Thunderbird. I'm sure others have got two line (sentence) messages that took 6+ lines to display. Then when they are replies or forwards it is even more. Every line gets two NLs/CRLFs. Anyone have a suggestion of how to _strip_ multiple line feeds from a message? Is there a sieve method/way? I don't want to fiddle with all the users emails just my own. Pointers, ideas, clues? \\||/ Rod --

Hi all, I've configured "quota_exceeded_message" in dovecot 1.2, but I have two questions: - Can I use "CRLF" in it? I'd like have two messages: english and spanish. - If char character set in dovecot.conf is ASCII, How do I set special characters (spanish)? The email received is in UTF-8 Thanks you -- Antonio Casado Rodr?guez Administrador de Servicios de Red y

...put being interpreted as IMAP commands, which could alter the user's mail store in unexpected ways and/or lead to the abrupt disconnection of the client for exceeding the maximum number of bad IMAP commands. Example using dovecot-2.2.1 (note that the text nonsync literal includes the invisible CRLFs: "foobarCRLFbarbazCRLF"): a3 append inbox catenate (url {9+} /some-url text {16+} foobar barbaz ) a4 noop a3 BAD Error in IMAP command APPEND: Invalid arguments. foobar BAD Error in IMAP command : Unknown command. barbaz BAD Error in IMAP command : Unknown command. ) BAD Error in IMAP co...

...ny enough, the related Winsock functions getservbyname and getservbyport have no problems to read these entries on all versions of Windows... except on the good old Windows 95, which tends to SEGV when trying to read these entries. Oh boy... Anyway, the below patch to ssh-host-config accomplishes CRLFs again under all conditions. Thanks in advance, Corinna Index: contrib/cygwin/ssh-host-config =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/openssh_cvs/contrib/cygwin/ssh-host-config,v retrieving revision 1.11 diff -p -u -r1.11 ssh-host-config --- contrib/cygwi...

...should be viewed as a conflict. o If I chmod g-s the directory, the command succeeds. But then I'm back to file ownership problems... drwxrws--- 4 4503 12 4096 Sep 22 06:17 F/N/ -rw-rw---- 1 4503 12 81530 Sep 22 06:17 F/N/Domain Names &- SSL Certificates Sequence from TB's trace (crlfs for clarity): 1140[11ebcf00]: 121e8c00:imap.example.com:A:SendData: 66 rename "F/N/Domain Names &- SSL Certificates" "F/N/Domain Names" 1140[11ebcf00]: ReadNextLine [stream=12135a28 nb=80 needmore=0] 1140[11ebcf00]: 121e8c00:imap.example.com:A:CreateNewLineFromSocket:...

Right, my understanding is that files that specifically need CRLF should say so via .gitattributes somewhere. autocrlf=false ought to work if your Windows editor doesn’t (or can be persuaded not to) introduce CRLFs. I’ve observed that the Visual Studio editor will detect the line-ending style of the file you’re editing, and imitate it. This works great until you create a new file. 😝 So I’ve learned to “create” a file by copying an existing file and then editing it. I’m inclined to think the llvm.org docs sh...

Hi all, TL;DR - should we recommend core.autocrlf=input instead of core.autocrlf=false on Windows? I recently switched from doing pre-commit builds and tests from my Ubuntu VM, to my Windows machine where I do all my development. I was aware that line endings is an issue, so made sure to set core.autocrlf=false as directed in the Getting Started guide (see