search for: cristianno

Hi Cristianno, Thank you, it works :) with an extra cast:                                     Value *v ......                                     ConstantInt* RR = (ConstantInt *)v;                                     uint64_t VV = (RR->getValue()).getLimitedValue();                                     err...

Oops, that's true: I forgot about that XD sorry =) Glad I could help, -- Cristianno Martins PhD Student of Computer Science University of Campinas cmartins at ic.unicamp.br <cristiannomartins at hotmail.com> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 4:38 AM, Alexandru Ionut Diaconescu < cyrusthevirus001x at yahoo.com> wrote: > Hi Cristianno, > > Thank you, it works :) > &...

...e is destroyed!"), function ~Value, file /Developer/llvm/lib/VMCore/Value.cpp, line 75. [...] This error occurred in between the return of the initialize() method and the actual return to the derived class method. Any one of you could help me to avoid this behavior? Best regards, -- Cristianno Martins PhD Student of Computer Science University of Campinas cmartins at ic.unicamp.br On Sunday, 8 de April de 2012 at 13:37, Cristianno Martins wrote: > Hello guys, > > So, I'm stucked in a problem involving a Function and a derived class. Well, I was refactoring part of my pa...

...attribute in A, btw), I get a message like that: Assertion failed: (!empty() && "Called front() on empty list!"), function front, file /Developer/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/ilist.h, line 388. [...] Is there some tricky way to do this that I'm not seeing? Thanks in advance, -- Cristianno Martins PhD Student of Computer Science University of Campinas cmartins at ic.unicamp.br -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120408/982dc280/attachment.html>

Thank you for your answer! You are right, but I still don't know how to build such a list dynamically using LLVM API with user type inside (I don't know this type yet ofc). 2013/4/15 Cristianno Martins <cristiannomartins at gmail.com> > Hi, > > I guess you could use a template with a std::vector: you don't need to > define right away the type, if you create a template of it. > > It should look something like that: > > template<class B> class List {...

Alexandru Ionut Diaconescu wrote: > Hi Cristianno, > > Thank you, it works :) > > with an extra cast: > Value *v ...... > ConstantInt* RR = (ConstantInt *)v; Please use "cast<ConstantInt>(v)" instead. See http://llvm.org/docs/ProgrammersManual.html#the-isa-cast-and-dyn-cast-templates . Nick > uint64_t VV =...

..., i8* %out.1107, align 1, !tbaa !1 and %storemerge = phi i8 [ %conv46, %if.else ], [ %call, %if.then ], where %storemerge has no uses. So, is there any other dce variant I should be enabling for opt? Better yet, is this the correct behavior for all the dce variants I enabled in opt? Thanks, -- Cristianno Martins PhD Student of Computer Science University of Campinas cmartins at ic.unicamp.br <cristiannomartins at hotmail.com> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130531/909d2e73/attachment.htm...

Hi Cristianno, On 01/06/13 01:49, Cristianno Martins wrote: > Hello there, > > I'm writing a transformation pass for LLVM, and I hoped to use dce to clean up > the resulting code after my pass. I just have some questions about LLVM's dce > implementation. > > Well, my transformation...

...e having local linkage, the "extern" part was not printed to file). - Second, I created the patch appended in this email, but instead of representing only the "guard-adding" part, this patch is a union of this change, and the others two patches you sent to me. Thanks again, -- Cristianno Martins PhD Student of Computer Science University of Campinas cmartins at ic.unicamp.br On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 6:19 AM, Dmitry N. Mikushin <maemarcus at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Cristianno, > > This problem has been around for a while, ourselves we solve it with the > following...

Hi, Sorry, but I'm not sure I understand what you're trying to do. I guess you want some kind of superclass of some set of classes that are defined in the llvm api(?). In that case, which are specifically the types you could have in this list you're trying to define? -- Cristianno Martins On Tuesday, 16 de April de 2013 at 04:22, B B wrote: > Thank you for your answer! > > You are right, but I still don't know how to build such a list dynamically using LLVM API with user type inside (I don't know this type yet ofc). > > > 2013/4/15 Cristiann...

...to be an extra BasicBlock (I mean, it is not directly represented in the IR) that holds only a copy of the branch instruction that ends the %while.cond block. Here is the question: is there any way that I could discard these blocks that are not represented in the IR? Thanks in advance, -- Cristianno Martins PhD Student of Computer Science University of Campinas cmartins at ic.unicamp.br -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120403/09b8d67f/attachment.html>

Hi Cristianno, > I'm trying to get a list of predecessors of a BasicBlock. I'm using a code > similar to that on here > <http://llvm.org/docs/ProgrammersManual.html#iterate_preds>, but it appears to > be more nodes been iterating that it should. Now, when I print out the llvm IR, >...

...iable Declarations */ static struct type_OC_str { unsigned char array[13]; }; /* Global Variable Definitions and Initialization */ static struct type_OC_str _OC_str = { "Hello World\n" }; It is a known problem, or am I doing something wrong? Thks in advance, -- Cristianno Martins PhD Student of Computer Science University of Campinas cmartins at ic.unicamp.br

Hi Alexandru, if you have a Value pointer named v, you could use the method v->getValue(). getLimitedValue(), which returns uint64_t, that can be casted as int. Hope I could help, -- Cristianno Martins PhD Student of Computer Science University of Campinas cmartins at ic.unicamp.br <cristiannomartins at hotmail.com> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 4:05 AM, Alexandru Ionut Diaconescu < cyrusthevirus001x at yahoo.com> wrote: > Hello ! > > This may be a trivial question, but...

Hi Cristianno, This problem has been around for a while, ourselves we solve it with the following patches: https://hpcforge.org/scm/viewvc.php/trunk/patches/llvm.gpu.patch?root=kernelgen&view=markup https://hpcforge.org/scm/viewvc.php/trunk/patches/llvm.patch?revision=591&root=kernelgen&view=marku...

Hello ! This may be a trivial question, but I cannot get fields from a Value type. If my Value is i32 1, how can I store 1 in a different structure (an integer) ? For the type, I have getType(). For the value, I see no method in Value.h. I tried to cast to ConstantExpr and then to get operands, or cast to ConstantDataArray and then use getAsString(), but is not working. How should I get the

...std::vector, but there is no possibility to generate bitcode of template, so I finally build it with std::vector<void*>. Do you know about any better solutions how to build such a type with llvm? Maybe there is a llvm built in type that is better choice than external c++ wrapper? 2013/4/16 Cristianno Martins <cristiannomartins at gmail.com> > Hi, > > Sorry, but I'm not sure I understand what you're trying to do. I guess you > want some kind of superclass of some set of classes that are defined in the > llvm api(?). In that case, which are specifically the types yo...

...other passes are going to do either before or after doFinalization() is called. Therefore, it's fine for doFinalization() to modify the Module. You just have to be aware that other passes may change the Module later. That's why I asked whether there are any other passes executed after Cristianno's pass: they can (theoretically) add the function declarations back into the Module. Regards, John Criswell > People more familiar with the pass managers – please correct me if I’m > wrong. > > Michael > > *From:*John Criswell [mailto:jtcriswel at gmail.com] > *Sent:*...

...dy finished its job? Thanks in advance, Oh, and before I forget, this is the version of the opt I'm running: LLVM (http://llvm.org/): LLVM version 3.7.0svn DEBUG build with assertions. Built May 4 2015 (00:18:21). Default target: x86_64-apple-darwin14.3.0 Host CPU: sandybridge -- Cristianno Martins PhD Student of Computer Science University of Campinas cmartins at ic.unicamp.br <cristiannomartins at hotmail.com> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150505/04fae3b8/attachment.htm...

...se of your function and using it to calculate the LoopInfo, as below: DominatorTreeBase<BasicBlock> *DTB; DTB = new DominatorTreeBase<BasicBlock>(false); DTB->recalculate(*AuxFunction); LoopInfoBase<BasicBlock, Loop> LIB; LIB.Calculate(*DTB); Cheers, -- Cristianno Martins PhD Student of Computer Science University of Campinas cmartins at ic.unicamp.br On Thursday, 26 de April de 2012 at 11:57, Hal Finkel wrote: > Rinaldini, > > What exactly did you run? Specifically, you may be missing some > analysis passes that are necessary for LoopInfo to...