search for: crimini

Hey folks. I have a rails controller which is filtering search results for access control. The search results are typically URLs into the rest of the rails app. I''m finding it would simplify the grotty code which is accumulating if I could manually invoke the router. That is to say, if I could send something a URI path string and get back the hash of controller, action, and params that

...ere is why we have it and who is doing it. I > > know Chandler and Tanya for a while and, while I do not speak for > > them, I trust them to *want* to do the right thing (tm). > > Social policies can be justified by beautifully-sounding, good intentions. > > Why don't we criminialize thought crimes, the world would be a better > place without unnice thoughts, wouldn't it. > > That particular persons have fallen prey for the temptation of censoring a > community according to principles that are irrelevant for the project, does > not mean they are faring w...

...However, the main point here is why we have it and who is doing it. I > know Chandler and Tanya for a while and, while I do not speak for > them, I trust them to *want* to do the right thing (tm). Social policies can be justified by beautifully-sounding, good intentions. Why don't we criminialize thought crimes, the world would be a better place without unnice thoughts, wouldn't it. That particular persons have fallen prey for the temptation of censoring a community according to principles that are irrelevant for the project, does not mean they are faring with bad intentions. Y...

...e is why we have it and who is doing it. I > > know Chandler and Tanya for a while and, while I do not speak for > > them, I trust them to *want* to do the right thing (tm). > > Social policies can be justified by beautifully-sounding, good intentions. > > Why don't we criminialize thought crimes, the world would be a better place without unnice thoughts, wouldn't it. > > That particular persons have fallen prey for the temptation of censoring a community according to principles that are irrelevant for the project, does not mean they are faring with bad intent...

>Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2007 06:04:02 -0800 (PST) >From: Nash Nipples <trashy_bumper@yahoo.com> >To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org >Subject: Re: IPFW: Blocking me out. How to debug? > >Dear W.D. > >oh come on. i have the same problem. Which problem are we talking about? cut and paste problem. >cut and paste logic: > >#!/bin/sh >#1. count packets >#2.

Dear W.D. Do you understand that by adding the rules into kernel space numbered from zero to sixty five thousand five hundred thirty four you may alter the behavior of the rule number sixty five thousand five hundred thirty five can you please define and list the goals you are trying to achieve by altering default rule in the terms you can both explain and understand. ----- Original Message

Hi peeps, After compiling ipfw into the new 6.2 kernel, and typing "ipfw list", all I get is: "65535 deny ip from any to any" From reading the docs, this might indicate that this is the default rule. (I am certainly protected this way--but can't be very productive ;^) ) By the way, when I run "man ipfw" I get nothing. Using this instead: